Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get RL9.5 working for non-OFED slurm builds #487

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

bertiethorpe
Copy link
Member

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe commented Nov 25, 2024

TASK [mysql : Pull container image] ********************************************
Monday 25 November 2024  16:48:12 +0000 (0:00:03.710)       0:05:07.831 ******* 
fatal: [slurmci-RL9-1579-control]: FAILED! => {
    "changed": false
}

MSG:

Failed to pull image docker.io/library/mysql:8.0.30

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2024 13:24
@bertiethorpe

This comment was marked as outdated.

@bertiethorpe
Copy link
Member Author

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe requested a review from sjpb November 28, 2024 10:23
Copy link
Collaborator

@sjpb sjpb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; not merging right now b/c we don't want to override our current RL9.4 image, given we can't build OFED for 9.5 at all. PR will be marked as draft.

@wtripp180901
Copy link
Contributor

can probably be replaced with #503

@sjpb
Copy link
Collaborator

sjpb commented Dec 18, 2024

Note when bumping to RL9.5 it'll need appliances_repo_timestamps in environments/common/inventory/group_vars/all/defaults.yml moving to appropriate/latest RL9.5 snapshots

@sjpb
Copy link
Collaborator

sjpb commented Dec 18, 2024

Replaced by #503

@sjpb sjpb closed this Dec 18, 2024
@sjpb sjpb deleted the fix/rl95-no-ofed branch December 18, 2024 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants