Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add TypeHierarchy doc #959

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

add TypeHierarchy doc #959

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

swissiety
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

Documentation Preview.

@swissiety swissiety requested a review from stschott July 1, 2024 07:42
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ public interface TypeHierarchy {
* For an interface type, this does the same as {@link #implementersOf(ClassType)}. For a class
* type, this does the same as {@link #subclassesOf(ClassType)}.
*/
// TODO: [ms] check! not sure this method makes sense in the interface..
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interfaces can extend from each other, so a subtype of an interface are interfaces.
It could be also that this methods also returns classes that implement the given interface

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • if we need it semantically - it seemed like a method that was extracted from the implementation class

@swissiety swissiety merged commit c553f63 into develop Jul 1, 2024
8 checks passed
@swissiety swissiety deleted the doc/typehierarchy branch July 1, 2024 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants