Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[P4_Symbolic] Adding p4_symbolic/ir/expected/default_transition.txt [Extend IR proto and translation to support parsers.] #778

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

VSuryaprasad-HCL
Copy link
Contributor

Keyword Check:
~/sonic-buildimage/src/sonic-p4rt/sonic-pins$ ~/tools/keyword_checks.sh .
Keyword check Passed.

Build Result:
/sonic/src/sonic-p4rt/sonic-pins$ bazel build $BAZEL_BUILD_OPTS ...
INFO: Analyzed 602 targets (4 packages loaded, 1020 targets configured).
INFO: Found 602 targets...
INFO: From Compiling p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc [for host]:
p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc: In function 'absl::lts_20230802::StatusOr<std::vectorz3::expr > p4_symbolic::EvaluateSaiParser(const SymbolicPerPacketState&)':
p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc:93:51: warning: suggest parentheses around '&&' within '||' [-Wparentheses]
93 | constraints.push_back(icmp.valid == (ipv4.valid && ipv4.protocol == 0x01 ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc:95:50: warning: suggest parentheses around '&&' within '||' [-Wparentheses]
95 | constraints.push_back(tcp.valid == (ipv4.valid && ipv4.protocol == 0x06 ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc:97:50: warning: suggest parentheses around '&&' within '||' [-Wparentheses]
97 | constraints.push_back(udp.valid == (ipv4.valid && ipv4.protocol == 0x11 ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
INFO: From Compiling p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc:
p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc: In function 'absl::lts_20230802::StatusOr<std::vectorz3::expr > p4_symbolic::EvaluateSaiParser(const SymbolicPerPacketState&)':
p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc:93:51: warning: suggest parentheses around '&&' within '||' [-Wparentheses]
93 | constraints.push_back(icmp.valid == (ipv4.valid && ipv4.protocol == 0x01 ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc:95:50: warning: suggest parentheses around '&&' within '||' [-Wparentheses]
95 | constraints.push_back(tcp.valid == (ipv4.valid && ipv4.protocol == 0x06 ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
p4_symbolic/sai/parser.cc:97:50: warning: suggest parentheses around '&&' within '||' [-Wparentheses]
97 | constraints.push_back(udp.valid == (ipv4.valid && ipv4.protocol == 0x11 ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
INFO: From Compiling p4_symbolic/main.cc [for host]:
In file included from p4_symbolic/tests/sai_p4_component_test.cc:27:
./p4_pdpi/pd.h:141:36: note: declared here
141 | absl::StatusOrp4::v1::TableEntry PartialPdTableEntryToPiTableEntry(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from p4_symbolic/tests/sai_p4_component_test.cc:22:
p4_symbolic/tests/sai_p4_component_test.cc:128:85: warning: 'absl::lts_20230802::StatusOrp4::v1::TableEntry pdpi::PartialPdTableEntryToPiTableEntry(const pdpi::IrP4Info&, const google::protobuf::Message&, const pdpi::TranslationOptions&)' is deprecated: Use PdTableEntryToPiEntity instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
128 | pdpi::PartialPdTableEntryToPiTableEntry(ir_p4info, pd_entry));
| ^
./gutil/status_matchers.h:64:43: note: in definition of macro 'ASSERT_OK_AND_ASSIGN'
64 | auto __ASSIGN_OR_RETURN_VAL(LINE) = expression;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from p4_symbolic/tests/sai_p4_component_test.cc:27:
./p4_pdpi/pd.h:141:36: note: declared here
141 | absl::StatusOrp4::v1::TableEntry PartialPdTableEntryToPiTableEntry(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
INFO: Elapsed time: 10.442s, Critical Path: 6.83s
INFO: 6 processes: 1 internal, 5 linux-sandbox.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 6 total actions

Test Result:
/sonic/src/sonic-p4rt/sonic-pins$ bazel test $BAZEL_BUILD_OPTS --cache_test_results=no ...
INFO: Analyzed 602 targets (25 packages loaded, 633 targets configured).
INFO: Found 403 targets and 199 test targets...
INFO: Elapsed time: 185.981s, Critical Path: 118.54s
INFO: 253 processes: 299 linux-sandbox, 18 local.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 253 total actions
//dvaas:port_id_map_test PASSED in 0.5s
//dvaas:test_run_validation_test PASSED in 1.3s
//dvaas:test_vector_stats_diff_test PASSED in 0.1s
//dvaas:test_vector_stats_test PASSED in 0.0s
//dvaas:test_vector_test PASSED in 0.6s
//dvaas:user_provided_packet_test_vector_diff_test PASSED in 0.1s
//dvaas:user_provided_packet_test_vector_test PASSED in 0.0s
//gutil:collections_test PASSED in 0.5s
//gutil:io_test PASSED in 0.5s
//p4rt_app/tests:packet_replication_table_test PASSED in 3.2s
//p4rt_app/tests:packetio_test PASSED in 4.9s
//p4rt_app/tests:port_name_and_id_test PASSED in 4.7s
//p4rt_app/tests:resource_limits_test PASSED in 3.4s
//p4rt_app/tests:response_path_test PASSED in 5.6s
//p4rt_app/tests:role_test PASSED in 1.5s
//p4rt_app/tests:state_verification_test PASSED in 2.9s
//p4rt_app/tests:vrf_table_test PASSED in 2.6s
//p4rt_app/tests/lib:app_db_entry_builder_test PASSED in 0.0s
//p4rt_app/utils:event_data_tracker_test PASSED in 0.0s
//p4rt_app/utils:table_utility_test PASSED in 0.7s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:clos_stage_test PASSED in 0.5s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:fabric_border_router_p4info_up_to_date_test PASSED in 0.0s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:middleblock_p4info_up_to_date_test PASSED in 0.1s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:sai_nonstandard_platforms_build_test PASSED in 0.0s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:sai_nonstandard_platforms_cc_test PASSED in 0.6s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:sai_p4info_fetcher_test PASSED in 0.7s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:sai_p4info_test PASSED in 1.2s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:sai_pd_proto_test PASSED in 0.0s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:sai_pd_util_test PASSED in 0.6s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:tor_p4info_up_to_date_test PASSED in 0.3s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:union_p4info_up_to_date_test PASSED in 0.1s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google:wbb_p4info_up_to_date_test PASSED in 0.0s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google/test_tools:table_entry_generator_helper_test PASSED in 2.8s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google/test_tools:test_entries_test PASSED in 0.9s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google/tests:p4_fuzzer_integration_test PASSED in 3.3s
//sai_p4/tools:p4info_tools_test PASSED in 0.6s
//sai_p4/tools:packetio_tools_test PASSED in 0.8s
//tests:thinkit_gnmi_interface_util_tests PASSED in 0.9s
//tests/qos:gnmi_parsers_test PASSED in 0.1s
//tests/qos:gnmi_parsers_test_runner PASSED in 0.0s
//thinkit:bazel_test_environment_test PASSED in 0.6s
//thinkit:generic_testbed_test PASSED in 0.9s
//thinkit:mock_control_device_test PASSED in 0.5s
//thinkit:mock_generic_testbed_test PASSED in 0.7s
//thinkit:mock_mirror_testbed_test PASSED in 0.6s
//thinkit:mock_ssh_client_test PASSED in 0.0s
//thinkit:mock_switch_test PASSED in 0.7s
//thinkit:mock_test_environment_test PASSED in 0.1s
//thinkit:switch_test PASSED in 0.7s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google/tests:p4_constraints_integration_test PASSED in 0.9s
Stats over 5 runs: max = 0.9s, min = 0.7s, avg = 0.8s, dev = 0.1s
//sai_p4/instantiations/google/test_tools:table_entry_generator_test PASSED in 43.8s
Stats over 50 runs: max = 43.8s, min = 0.8s, avg = 3.7s, dev = 10.2s

Executed 199 out of 199 tests: 199 tests pass.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 253 total actions

kishanps and others added 8 commits November 25, 2024 13:09
PiperOrigin-RevId: 537422979
…tice. [Remove disjointness check on set of tables that get evaluate in each branch of a conditional.]
…lattice files. [Remove disjointness check on set of tables that get evaluate in each branch of a conditional.]
…m reusable. Change EvaluateSaiPipeline to take a forwarding pipeline config instead of a SAI Instantiation.
…Extend IR proto and translation to support parsers.]
@VSuryaprasad-HCL
Copy link
Contributor Author

Co-authored-by: Srikishen Pondicherry Shanmugam [email protected]

Copy link
Contributor

@bibhuprasad-hcl bibhuprasad-hcl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kishanps, Could you please review.
Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants