Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add container test doc info for --exclude-node-modules #5640

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

adrobuta
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request Submission Checklist

  • Follows CONTRIBUTING guidelines
  • Includes detailed description of changes
  • Contains risk assessment (Low | Medium | High)
  • Highlights breaking API changes (if applicable)
  • Links to automated tests covering new functionality
  • Includes manual testing instructions (if necessary)
  • Updates relevant GitBook documentation (PR link: ___)

What does this PR do?

Where should the reviewer start?

How should this be manually tested?

@adrobuta adrobuta requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2024 15:02
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Warnings
⚠️

Please make changes to snyk help text in Gitbook. Changes will be automatically synchronised to Snyk CLI as a scheduled PR.
For more information, see: help/README.md.

⚠️

You've modified files in src/ directory, but haven't updated anything in test folder. Is there something that could be tested?

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 2faf2d1

@adrobuta adrobuta force-pushed the fix/container-test-exclude-node-modules branch from 1775c28 to 2faf2d1 Compare December 20, 2024 09:14
@sandor-trombitas sandor-trombitas merged commit 2b913f3 into main Dec 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@sandor-trombitas sandor-trombitas deleted the fix/container-test-exclude-node-modules branch December 20, 2024 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants