Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SNOW-1794369 Catalog API #2655

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sfc-gh-aalam
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Which Jira issue is this PR addressing? Make sure that there is an accompanying issue to your PR.

    Fixes SNOW-1794369

  2. Fill out the following pre-review checklist:

    • I am adding a new automated test(s) to verify correctness of my new code
      • If this test skips Local Testing mode, I'm requesting review from @snowflakedb/local-testing
    • I am adding new logging messages
    • I am adding a new telemetry message
    • I am adding new credentials
    • I am adding a new dependency
    • If this is a new feature/behavior, I'm adding the Local Testing parity changes.
    • I acknowledge that I have ensured my changes to be thread-safe. Follow the link for more information: Thread-safe Developer Guidelines
  3. Please describe how your code solves the related issue.

    This PR adds the catalog API.

Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

1 similar comment
Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

Copy link

Seems like your changes contain some Local Testing changes, please request review from @snowflakedb/local-testing

@sfc-gh-jrose sfc-gh-jrose requested a review from a team November 21, 2024 20:49
tests/integ/test_catalog.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/source/snowpark/catalog.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sfc-gh-smirzaei sfc-gh-smirzaei removed their request for review November 22, 2024 19:25
Comment on lines +23 to +26
class Column(NamedTuple):
name: str
datatype: str
nullable: bool
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very similar to Attribute in src/snowflake/snowpark/_internal/analyzer/expression.py

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree but I don't know how what is a suitable alternative here. Do you have any suggestions?

external_feature_name="Session.catalog",
raise_error=NotImplementedError,
)
self._catalog = Catalog(self)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The circular dependency this creates could be troublesome in the future, but for now I think this is ok.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah. it similar to Dataframe

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants