Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More randomising of externalJobID and name #11008

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

cedric-cordenier
Copy link
Contributor

  • Also inline specs that are only used in one place, and remove unused specs.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

I see that you haven't updated any CHANGELOG files. Would it make sense to do so?

@cedric-cordenier cedric-cordenier force-pushed the randomize-name-external-job-ids branch 4 times, most recently from e67297b to c4e1a98 Compare October 19, 2023 16:11
- Also inline specs that are only used in one place, and remove unused
  specs.
@cedric-cordenier cedric-cordenier force-pushed the randomize-name-external-job-ids branch from c4e1a98 to 62a4523 Compare October 19, 2023 16:16
@cedric-cordenier cedric-cordenier marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2023 16:30
@@ -352,7 +434,6 @@ func TestIntegration_DirectRequest(t *testing.T) {
for _, tt := range tests {
test := tt
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: I had to remove this to get the tests to pass reliably. Because each test is setting up its own simulator, making them run in parallel is causing both simulators to race when adding transactions, and seems to be causing a deadlock somewhere. I want to keep momentum up so am not going to tackle that particular issue at this time.

"""
`

const multiWordSpecTemplate = `
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No preference, but did you consider using package embed for these instead of moving them in here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't, but I think this is a better way of doing this so I've amended it.

jmank88
jmank88 previously approved these changes Oct 19, 2023
jmank88
jmank88 previously approved these changes Oct 19, 2023
@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@cedric-cordenier cedric-cordenier added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 20, 2023
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 71e7de3 Oct 20, 2023
83 checks passed
@cedric-cordenier cedric-cordenier deleted the randomize-name-external-job-ids branch October 20, 2023 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants