Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update go.mod replaces #386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2023
Merged

update go.mod replaces #386

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

jmank88
Copy link
Contributor

@jmank88 jmank88 commented Dec 6, 2023

Following #379, I noticed these go.mod replaces are stale.

core ref: BCF-2612-ChainReader-EVM-POC

@jmank88 jmank88 requested review from reductionista, cfal and ilija42 and removed request for reductionista December 6, 2023 12:06
@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Contributor

@ilija42 ilija42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@cfal
Copy link
Collaborator

cfal commented Dec 6, 2023

damn, integration tests are failing again.

@cfal cfal self-requested a review December 6, 2023 15:53
Copy link
Collaborator

@cfal cfal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it seems related to the ChainReader stuff: https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink-cosmos/actions/runs/7114275441/job/19367994022?pr=386

i guess pointing it to the same ref as the last PR should get it to pass?

@jmank88
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmank88 commented Dec 6, 2023

I can just wait for develop to be merged.

It would be better if you just edit the description of this PR to include this text:

core ref: BCF-2612-ChainReader-EVM-POC

Then I can update the go.mod in the chainlink PR to point to this reference instead of the previous one, before merging?

@reductionista
Copy link
Contributor

I can just wait for develop to be merged.

It would be better if you just edit the description of this PR to include this text:

core ref: BCF-2612-ChainReader-EVM-POC

Then I can update the go.mod in the chainlink PR to point to this reference instead of the previous one, before merging?

Just realized I can edit it myself... weird. Went ahead and added it, so hopefully it will go green now

@cfal
Copy link
Collaborator

cfal commented Dec 6, 2023

yep, editing the description causes the test run to restart. didn't know anyone could edit though, cool :)

@cfal
Copy link
Collaborator

cfal commented Dec 6, 2023

Then I can update the go.mod in the chainlink PR to point to this reference instead of the previous one, before merging?

wouldn't the hash change once this PR gets merged into develop?

@reductionista
Copy link
Contributor

Then I can update the go.mod in the chainlink PR to point to this reference instead of the previous one, before merging?

wouldn't the hash change once this PR gets merged into develop?

Because it's only a single commit, "sqash and merge" won't change the commit hash. It does generate an empty merge commit on top of it, but that shouldn't matter. Although it's moot anyway, since I'm going to merge this one and then update the hash immediately after.

@reductionista reductionista merged commit 03f8b21 into develop Dec 6, 2023
16 of 17 checks passed
@reductionista reductionista deleted the mod-replace-update branch December 6, 2023 16:42
@reductionista
Copy link
Contributor

@cfal You were right actually, it did change the commit hash. For some reason it worked when I merged the starknet PR, but not this one:
smartcontractkit/chainlink-starknet#331

Must be different settings for these repos I guess? Anyway, the hash is pointing to the merged one now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants