Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handling 0 StorageDestructionPatchTimestamp #1554

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2023

Conversation

DmytroNazarenko
Copy link
Collaborator

@DmytroNazarenko DmytroNazarenko commented Jun 21, 2023

Add handling 0 timestamp for StorageDestructionPatch

@DmytroNazarenko DmytroNazarenko linked an issue Jun 21, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1554 (72bef15) into develop (8ba6d16) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 72bef15 differs from pull request most recent head 43b683b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 43b683b to get more accurate results

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1554   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    45.94%   45.94%           
========================================
  Files          339      339           
  Lines        51261    51263    +2     
========================================
+ Hits         23551    23552    +1     
- Misses       27710    27711    +1     

@DmytroNazarenko DmytroNazarenko changed the title Update StorageDestructionPatch.cpp Handling 0 StorageDestructionPatchTimestamp Jun 21, 2023
@DmytroNazarenko DmytroNazarenko merged commit 01598e0 into develop Jun 21, 2023
@DmytroNazarenko DmytroNazarenko deleted the enhancement/fix-patch branch June 21, 2023 09:04
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve data destruction in EVM
1 participant