Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement cache store for build records #505

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pditommaso
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR implements a cache store for Wave build records. Solves #496

@pditommaso pditommaso marked this pull request as draft May 21, 2024 03:17
@munishchouhan munishchouhan changed the title Implement cache store fro build records Implement cache store for build records May 23, 2024
@munishchouhan
Copy link
Member

@pditommaso sorry, updated by mistake, please pull before making changes

@munishchouhan munishchouhan self-assigned this May 28, 2024
@munishchouhan
Copy link
Member

@pditommaso I have fixed and added some unit tests

@pditommaso pditommaso marked this pull request as ready for review May 30, 2024 22:02
pditommaso and others added 7 commits May 31, 2024 18:10

Signed-off-by: Paolo Di Tommaso <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Di Tommaso <[email protected]>
* added homebrew

* added homebrew
Signed-off-by: Paolo Di Tommaso <[email protected]>
Comment on lines 108 to 110
// try to lookup legacy record
final legacyId = BuildRequest.legacyBuildId(buildId)
return legacyId ? loadBuild1(legacyId) : null
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a concrete reason why the load of via legacy id was removed?

VERSION Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
VERSION Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pditommaso pditommaso merged commit dd195de into master May 31, 2024
1 check passed
@pditommaso pditommaso deleted the add-buildrecord-cache-store branch May 31, 2024 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants