-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FIX] libc++: performance tests #3211
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3211 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.17% 98.17%
=======================================
Files 269 269
Lines 11852 11852
=======================================
Hits 11636 11636
Misses 216 216 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
81557c9
to
26c0845
Compare
26c0845
to
68807c7
Compare
[seed](uint64_t const i) | ||
[](uint64_t const i) | ||
{ | ||
return i ^ seed; | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how is seed
available now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's implicitly captured because it's const.
for (size_t index = 0; index < end_index; ++index, ++simd_index) | ||
for (size_t index = 0; index < end_index; ++index, simd_index += 1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
++
did not work? seems so basic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Libc++ says it implements ++
for Simd types, but it doesn't work :D
68807c7
to
e0a14f1
Compare
No description provided.