Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] libc++: performance tests #3211

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

eseiler
Copy link
Member

@eseiler eseiler commented Nov 13, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 13, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
seqan3 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 16, 2023 1:05pm

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Nov 13, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9f0ffc8) 98.17% compared to head (e0a14f1) 98.17%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3211   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.17%   98.17%           
=======================================
  Files         269      269           
  Lines       11852    11852           
=======================================
  Hits        11636    11636           
  Misses        216      216           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Nov 13, 2023
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Nov 14, 2023
Comment on lines -101 to 104
[seed](uint64_t const i)
[](uint64_t const i)
{
return i ^ seed;
});
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how is seed available now?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's implicitly captured because it's const.

for (size_t index = 0; index < end_index; ++index, ++simd_index)
for (size_t index = 0; index < end_index; ++index, simd_index += 1)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

++ did not work? seems so basic

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Libc++ says it implements ++ for Simd types, but it doesn't work :D

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Nov 16, 2023
@eseiler eseiler merged commit 5cbcaf4 into seqan:master Nov 16, 2023
29 checks passed
@eseiler eseiler deleted the infra/performance branch November 16, 2023 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants