Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Clang support #3195

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Sep 29, 2023
Merged

[FEATURE] Clang support #3195

merged 21 commits into from
Sep 29, 2023

Conversation

eseiler
Copy link
Member

@eseiler eseiler commented Sep 28, 2023

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 28, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
seqan3 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 29, 2023 9:06am

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added the lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting label Sep 28, 2023
The correct version would have been __cpp_nontype_template_args >= 201911L. All supported compilers fulfil this.
@seqan-actions seqan-actions removed the lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting label Sep 28, 2023
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Sep 28, 2023
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Sep 28, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ac1127a) 98.14% compared to head (ae5be12) 98.14%.

❗ Current head ae5be12 differs from pull request most recent head 62392a1. Consider uploading reports for the commit 62392a1 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3195      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.14%   98.14%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         269      269              
  Lines       11861    11855       -6     
==========================================
- Hits        11641    11635       -6     
  Misses        220      220              
Files Coverage Δ
...alignment/configuration/align_config_on_result.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...qan3/alignment/matrix/detail/trace_matrix_full.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../seqan3/alignment/pairwise/alignment_algorithm.hpp 99.39% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
...ude/seqan3/alignment/pairwise/alignment_result.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...airwise/detail/policy_alignment_result_builder.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ude/seqan3/alphabet/composite/alphabet_variant.hpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ude/seqan3/alphabet/composite/semialphabet_any.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/seqan3/alphabet/views/translate_join.hpp 100.00% <ø> (ø)
include/seqan3/argument_parser/argument_parser.hpp 98.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ude/seqan3/argument_parser/detail/format_parse.hpp 96.78% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 17 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Sep 28, 2023
@eseiler eseiler marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2023 20:35
{
using alternative_predicate = detail::weakly_equality_comparable_with_<indirect_alternative_type>;
constexpr auto alternative_position =
constexpr bool alternative_position =
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks suspicious. isn't alternative_position holding the position?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, good catch. That was a search/replace error when changing the return type of two operators from auto .... -> bool to bool :)

Copy link
Contributor

@SGSSGene SGSSGene left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is one line I am not sure about correctness.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Sep 29, 2023
@SGSSGene SGSSGene self-requested a review September 29, 2023 09:21
@eseiler eseiler merged commit de22aa7 into seqan:master Sep 29, 2023
23 checks passed
@eseiler eseiler deleted the feature/clang branch September 29, 2023 09:21
@eseiler eseiler mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants