-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] Clang support #3195
[FEATURE] Clang support #3195
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
The correct version would have been __cpp_nontype_template_args >= 201911L. All supported compilers fulfil this.
66937c5
to
45ef361
Compare
45ef361
to
91b5623
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3195 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.14% 98.14% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 269 269
Lines 11861 11855 -6
==========================================
- Hits 11641 11635 -6
Misses 220 220
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
91b5623
to
ae5be12
Compare
{ | ||
using alternative_predicate = detail::weakly_equality_comparable_with_<indirect_alternative_type>; | ||
constexpr auto alternative_position = | ||
constexpr bool alternative_position = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks suspicious. isn't alternative_position
holding the position?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, good catch. That was a search/replace error when changing the return type of two operators from auto .... -> bool
to bool
:)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is one line I am not sure about correctness.
Clang in CPP20 mode emits bogus warnings for seqan3::pod_tuple
overloaded <</>> has higher precedence than ==
gcc11 complains suddenly
mutable refers to the capture
ae5be12
to
62392a1
Compare
No description provided.