Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC rework the over-sampling section of the user guide #1117

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

virchan
Copy link
Contributor

@virchan virchan commented Jan 1, 2025

Reference Issue

N/A

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This PR reworks the Over-sampling section of the user guide to improve its organisation.

Any other comments?

N/A

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.87%. Comparing base (e32819e) to head (c1c74db).
Report is 31 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1117      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.98%   93.87%   +0.89%     
==========================================
  Files         105       54      -51     
  Lines        8323     3610    -4713     
  Branches     1288      486     -802     
==========================================
- Hits         7739     3389    -4350     
+ Misses        465      124     -341     
+ Partials      119       97      -22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Imbalanced-learn samplers accept the same inputs as scikit-learn estimators:
* `data`, 2-dimensional array-like structures, such as:
* Python's list of lists :class:`list`,
* Numpy arrays :class:`numpy.ndarray`,
* Panda dataframes :class:`pandas.DataFrame`,
* Pandas dataframes :class:`pandas.DataFrame`,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixing a typo from #1110.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant