0.9

Makefile

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 PACKAGE	:= pcpp
-VERSION	:= 0.8
+VERSION	:= 0.9
 AUTHOR	:= R.Jaksa 2008,2024 GPLv3
-SUBVERSION := c
+SUBVERSION := 
 
 SHELL	:= /bin/bash
 PATH	:= usr/bin:$(PATH)
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ DOC	:= $(BIN:%=%.md)
 all: $(BIN) $(DOC)
 
 $(BIN): %: %.pl .%.d .version.pl .%.built.pl Makefile
-	echo -e '#!/usr/bin/perl' > $@
-	echo -e "# $@ generated from $(PKGNAME)/$< $(DATE)" >> $@
+	@echo -e '#!/usr/bin/perl' > $@
+	@echo -e "# $@ generated from $(PKGNAME)/$< $(DATE)" >> $@
 	usr/bin/pcpp $< >> $@
-	chmod 755 $@
+	@chmod 755 $@
 	@sync # to ensure pcpp is saved before used in the next rule
 	@echo
 
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ $(DOC): %.md: %
 	@echo 'our $$VERSION = "$(VERSION)";' >> $@
 	@echo 'our $$AUTHOR = "$(AUTHOR)";' >> $@
 	@echo 'our $$SUBVERSION = "$(SUBVERSION)";' >> $@
-	@echo "update $@"
+	@echo "make $@"
 
 .PRECIOUS: .%.built.pl
 .%.built.pl: %.pl .version.pl Makefile
 	@echo 'our $$BUILT = "$(DATE)";' > $@
-	@echo "update $@"
+	@echo "make $@"
 
 # /map install, requires /map directory and getversion and mapinstall tools
 ifneq ($(wildcard /map),)

NEWS

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+0.9   - -d shows nonexistent files too
       - better -l output
 0.8   - raised version number to be above perlpp
       - added -d to generate Makefile dependencies lists

README.md

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 # Simple Perl (Python/C/C++) preprocessor
 
-This simple preprocessor handles in-comments include directive.  Such include
-statements that are contained inside comments provide additional level of code
-organization, above the Perl's `require` and `use`, or Python's `import`, or
-C/C++ `#include` native mechanisms.  However, these both mechanisms (native and
+This simple preprocessor handles in-comments include directives.  Such include
+statements that are contained inside comments provide an additional level of
+code organization, above Perl's `require` and `use`, Python's `import`, or
+C/C++ `#include` native mechanisms.  However, both these mechanisms (native and
 pcpp) can coexist together.  Or, the pcpp can be used instead of the native
 mechanism.
 
-In following Perl and C examples the "abc" code will be copy-pasted into source
-code by the pcpp, while the "xyz" code will be handled be native include
-mechanisms:
+In the following Perl and C examples the "abc" code will be copy-pasted into
+the source code by the pcpp, while the "xyz" code will be handled by native
+include mechanisms:
 
 ``` perl
 # Perl usage
@@ -47,26 +47,26 @@ perl abc.pl
 ```
 
 This looks as if we first "compile" the bunch of Perl source files into the
-"executable" Perl file and only then run it.  Similarly to a c code, which has
-to be compiled before it can be executed.  It is a disadvantage as it requires
-the extra step `pcpp abc.in.pl`.  But the following step `perl abc.pl` becomes
-actually simpler:
+"executable" Perl file and only then run it.  Similarly, a C code has to be
+compiled before it can be executed.  It is a disadvantage as it requires the
+extra step `pcpp abc.in.pl`.  But the following step `perl abc.pl` becomes
+simpler:
 
  * now the abc\.pl doesn't require the dependent .pl files to be installed,
- * the abc\.pl stays a interpreted language code which can be fixed if needed
+ * the abc\.pl stays an interpreted language code that can be fixed if needed
    (comments stay in as well).
 
-The same holds for Python.  Pcpp-ing is some kind of simple code amalgamation,
+The same holds for Python.  Pcpp-ing is some kind of simple code amalgamation
 or a "static linker" for Perl/Python.  In C/C++ the pcpp is useful if you want
 to hide something from the cpp preprocessor.
 
-Other reason to use pcpp instead of native require/use/import is that the pcpp
-processing logic is simpler.  And one more reason is that such include process
-cannot be skewed at the use-time, run-time.
+Another reason to use pcpp instead of native require/use/import is that the
+pcpp processing logic is simpler.  One more reason is that such include process
+cannot be skewed at the use-time and run-time.
 
 ### In-comment directives
 
-Hidding the pcpp directives in comments allows to avoid conflicts with the main
+Hiding the pcpp directives in comments allows to avoid conflicts with the main
 language interpreter/compiler/preprocessor, with IDEs or editing modes.
 Further, this increases the number of comments ;-)
 
@@ -79,15 +79,15 @@ optional, whitespace between the hash and the "include" word is optional:
 
 The additional text after the filename(s) is a comment and is ignored,
 filenames have to be identified by the .pl (or .py/.h) suffix or have to be
-quoted for the parser to find the begin of comment:
+quoted for the parser to find the beginning of the comment:
 
 ```
 # include abc.pl xyz.pl comment text which is ignored
 # include abc.py xyz.py # visualy more noticeable comment
 // include abc.h comment in C/C++
 ```
 
-Multiple hashes (slashes) are not accepted, thus following code are just
+Multiple hashes (slashes) are not accepted, the following code are just
 comments without any effect:
 
 ```
@@ -107,15 +107,16 @@ Included content in the pcpp output is "watermarked" by the `# included` and
 # end "abc.pl"
 ```
 
-Indentation of the include statement is propagated into output.  For instance
-a two-spaces indentation of the hash of include statement in perl code:
+Indentation of the include statement is propagated into output.  For instance a
+two-space indentation of the hash of the include statement in perl code:
 
 ``` perl
 some(code);
   # include abc.pl
 ```
 
-will lead to added two spaces to the original indentation in included file:
+will lead to adding two spaces to the original indentation in the included
+file:
 
 ``` perl
 some(code);
@@ -126,26 +127,26 @@ some(code);
 ```
 
 The language is autodetected according to the suffix of the input file: `.pl`,
-`.py`, `.c` or `.c++`.
+`.py`, `.c`, or `.c++`.
 
 ### Paths resolving
 
-Include paths can be spcified as a filename only `# include abc.pl` or
+Include paths can be specified as a filename only `# include abc.pl` or
 specifying also a part of the path `# include xy/abc.pl` or `# include
 yz/abc.pl` to distinguish between equal filenames in different directories.
 The resolving algorithm is:
 
-1. trying direct path from current working directory,
-2. trying path from directory of file from which the include is called,
-3. try to find file recursively in any subdirectory of current working directory (in the depth order),
-4. strip the directory part from include file name, and try to find it just by the filename.
+1. trying direct path from the current working directory,
+2. trying the path from the directory of the file from which the include is called,
+3. try to find files recursively in any subdirectory of the current working directory (in the depth order),
+4. strip the directory part from the included file name, and try to find it just by the filename.
 
 In the case of conflict, i.e. `# include "abc.pl"` where two `abc.pl` are
-available, the first one is chosen: `./abc.pl` is direct path so has higher
-priority than the `xy/abc.pl`.
+available, the first one is chosen: `./abc.pl` is the direct path so it has a
+higher priority than the `xy/abc.pl`.
 
-Double includes are avoided, so the file from given path is copy-pasted to the
-output only once, on the place of the firste appearance of the include
+Double includes are avoided, so the file from the given path is copy-pasted to
+the output only once, on the place of the first appearance of the include
 statement.
 
 Missing include files are by default silently ignored, or reported in the
@@ -154,9 +155,9 @@ verbose mode (-v switch).
 ### Triple comments
 
 Pcpp preserves comments to allow the Perl or Python output code to be readable
-as best as possible in order to allow the output to be hacked/fixed.
+as best as possible to allow the output to be hacked/fixed.
 
-However, to allow programmer to request the removal of comments from the
+However, to allow the programmer to request the removal of comments from the
 output, we introduce the "triple comments":
 
 ```
@@ -176,7 +177,7 @@ the pcpp processed code, not the code you wrote.
 
 ### Uninclude
 
-Watermarked pcpp output allows to remove included parts and return to the
+Watermarked pcpp output allows the removal of included parts and return to the
 original source code using the `uninclude` tool.  This can be useful when
 building "libraries" which can recursively pack all dependencies, which can be
 stripped off when not needed (when already provided by another "library").
@@ -194,7 +195,7 @@ instance the following included content:
 # end abc.pl
 ```
 
-will be flattend by uninclude to:
+will be flattened by uninclude to:
 
 ```
 # include abc.pl
@@ -215,20 +216,20 @@ which when included back will become:
 
 ### Pcpp in Makefile
 
-Example to make `xyz` from from its source `xyz.pl` and two included files:
+Example to make `xyz` from its source `xyz.pl` and two included files:
 
 ``` makefile
 xyz: xyz.pl inc1.pl inc2.pl
 	echo '#!/usr/bin/perl' > $@
 	pcpp $< >> $@
 	@chmod 755 $@
-	@sync # to ensure the result is saved before used in the next rule
+	@sync # to ensure the result is saved before being used in the next rule
 ```
 
  1. generate #! interpreter identifier
  2. build `xyz` from `xyz.pl`
  3. make it executable
- 4. sync the result before it is used by other makefile rule (otherwise it can be incomplete)
+ 4. sync the result before it is used by another makefile rule (otherwise it can be incomplete)
 
 More complex example:
 
@@ -248,13 +249,16 @@ $(OUTPUT): %: %.pl $(DEPENDENCIES) Makefile
 ```
 
  * `DEPENDENCIES` are a list of files to be included obtained by `pcpp -lp`
- * `SIGN` is a variable made available from Makefile into script
+ * `SIGN` is a variable made available from Makefile into the script
 
 ### Dependency files
 
 The `pcpp -d target_name` can be used to generate a dependency file for
 Makefile.  Compared to the `-lp` option, the `-d` and `-dd` options also add
-the input file into the list.  Example Makefile:
+the input file into the list and nonexistent files too.  Nonexistent include
+files are files that will be generated by the Makefile.  A full path is
+required for them to work properly (relative path is ok if it is complete).
+Example Makefile:
 
 ``` makefile
 # require rebuild of the dependencies file .abc.d when processing abc.pl
@@ -282,7 +286,7 @@ to any `/bin` directory for a system-wide installation.
 
 ### Under the hood
 
-The pcpp itself is processed by the pcpp, so its source code is example how to
-use the pcpp.
+The pcpp itself is processed by the pcpp, so its source code is an example of
+how to use the pcpp.
 
 <br><div align=right><i>R.Jaksa 2008,2024</i></div>

include.pl

@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@
   elsif($ok==3) { report $CC_,beautify($path) }	# OK
   else          { report $CR_,$file }		# not found
 
-  # deps
-  $DEPLIST.=beautify($path)." " if $DEPS and $ok;
+  # deps (show also nonexistent files, to allow to be generated)
+  $DEPLIST.=beautify($path)." " if $DEPS;
 
   return if $ok==0;				# file not found
   return if $ok==1; # file already included (TODO: accept if requested, but avoid recursion)

pcpp

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 #!/usr/bin/perl
-# pcpp generated from pcpp-0.8c/pcpp.pl 2024-06-30
+# pcpp generated from pcpp-0.9/pcpp.pl 2024-07-06
 
 # included ".version.pl"
 our $PACKAGE = "pcpp";
-our $VERSION = "0.8";
+our $VERSION = "0.9";
 our $AUTHOR = "R.Jaksa 2008,2024 GPLv3";
-our $SUBVERSION = "c";
+our $SUBVERSION = "";
 # end ".version.pl"
 
 # included ".pcpp.built.pl"
-our $BUILT = "2024-06-30";
+our $BUILT = "2024-07-06";
 # end ".pcpp.built.pl"
 
 $HELP=<<EOF;
@@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ our sub addfile {
   elsif($ok==3) { report $CC_,beautify($path) }	# OK
   else          { report $CR_,$file }		# not found
 
-  # deps
-  $DEPLIST.=beautify($path)." " if $DEPS and $ok;
+  # deps (show also nonexistent files, to allow to be generated)
+  $DEPLIST.=beautify($path)." " if $DEPS;
 
   return if $ok==0;				# file not found
   return if $ok==1; # file already included (TODO: accept if requested, but avoid recursion)

pcpp.md

@@ -58,5 +58,5 @@ Simple Perl/Python/C/C++ preprocessor for in-comment directives.
        pcpp -d pcpp pcpp.pl > .pcpp.d
 
 ### VERSION
-pcpp-0.8c R.Jaksa 2008,2024 GPLv3 built 2024-06-30
+pcpp-0.9 R.Jaksa 2008,2024 GPLv3 built 2024-07-06
 

uninclude

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 #!/usr/bin/perl
-# uninclude generated from pcpp-0.8c/uninclude.pl 2024-06-30
+# uninclude generated from pcpp-0.9/uninclude.pl 2024-07-06
 
 # included ".version.pl"
 our $PACKAGE = "pcpp";
-our $VERSION = "0.8";
+our $VERSION = "0.9";
 our $AUTHOR = "R.Jaksa 2008,2024 GPLv3";
-our $SUBVERSION = "c";
+our $SUBVERSION = "";
 # end ".version.pl"
 
 # included ".uninclude.built.pl"
-our $BUILT = "2024-06-30";
+our $BUILT = "2024-07-06";
 # end ".uninclude.built.pl"
 
 $HELP=<<EOF;

uninclude.md

@@ -16,5 +16,5 @@ but they are flattened to a single level direct includes.
     -ni  Don't return back #include statements.
 
 ### VERSION
-pcpp-0.8c R.Jaksa 2008,2024 GPLv3 built 2024-06-30
+pcpp-0.9 R.Jaksa 2008,2024 GPLv3 built 2024-07-06