-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: clean up Marketo implementation for file upload et al #3872
Conversation
Test report for this run is available at: https://test-integrations-dev.s3.amazonaws.com/integrations-test-reports/rudder-transformer/3872/test-report.html |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #3872 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 89.02% 90.39% +1.37%
===========================================
Files 610 602 -8
Lines 32959 31966 -993
Branches 7789 7602 -187
===========================================
- Hits 29341 28896 -445
+ Misses 3305 2816 -489
+ Partials 313 254 -59 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
so marketo new implementation is stable enough to remove this? |
Yes nothing unusual is observed |
What are the changes introduced in this PR?
This PR aims to clean up the fileUpload, poll, and jobstatus functionalities of Marketo Bulk Upload Implementation, as this implementation have been migrated to rudder server via following PR
What is the related Linear task?
Resolves INT-765
Please explain the objectives of your changes below
Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here
Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?
N/A
Any new dependencies introduced with this change?
N/A
Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.
N/A
Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?
N/A
@coderabbitai review
Developer checklist
My code follows the style guidelines of this project
No breaking changes are being introduced.
All related docs linked with the PR?
All changes manually tested?
Any documentation changes needed with this change?
Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?
Is the PR limited to one linear task?
Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?
Reviewer checklist
Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?
Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.