Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update order_id in checkout events, messageId in pixel events #3794

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Contributor

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai commented Oct 13, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

  1. update order_id in checkout events.
  2. add messageId in pixel events.
  3. add shopifyDetails objects support for pixel events inside context. ( shopifyDetails is a dump object with the complete event payload sent from Shopify.)

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-2789

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai self-assigned this Oct 13, 2024
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai requested review from sivashanmukh and a team as code owners October 13, 2024 19:49
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.98%. Comparing base (8f53316) to head (5aa9239).
Report is 18 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3794      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    89.06%   88.98%   -0.08%     
===========================================
  Files          608      607       -1     
  Lines        32987    32808     -179     
  Branches      7807     7755      -52     
===========================================
- Hits         29379    29195     -184     
+ Misses        3331     3300      -31     
- Partials       277      313      +36     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

@krishna2020 krishna2020 merged commit 427be71 into develop Oct 21, 2024
29 checks passed
@krishna2020 krishna2020 deleted the fix.shopify.orderid.messageid branch October 21, 2024 09:25
sanpj2292 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
…3794)

* fix: update order_id in checkout events, messageId in pixel events

* chore: add shopifyDetails support

* chore: add shopifyDetails for shopify server side events from pixel

* chore: set id property in the webhook event as messageId for pixel serverside event

* chore: update tests
sanpj2292 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
…3794)

* fix: update order_id in checkout events, messageId in pixel events

* chore: add shopifyDetails support

* chore: add shopifyDetails for shopify server side events from pixel

* chore: set id property in the webhook event as messageId for pixel serverside event

* chore: update tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants