Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: salesforce v2 refactor #3773

Closed
wants to merge 14 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

shrouti1507
Copy link
Contributor

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 commented Oct 1, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

salesforceResponseHandler to re-visit using switch case instead of multiple if-else statements

To have single logic of to infer from event for OAUTH or LEGACY implementation - #2873 (comment)

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-1129

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 changed the title fix: initial commit fix: salesforce v2 refactor Oct 1, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.61538% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.97%. Comparing base (78c14b8) to head (80bea09).
Report is 38 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/v0/destinations/salesforce/utils.js 81.39% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3773      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    88.98%   88.97%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          607      607              
  Lines        32800    32831      +31     
  Branches      7753     7759       +6     
===========================================
+ Hits         29188    29212      +24     
- Misses        3329     3336       +7     
  Partials       283      283              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@koladilip koladilip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add description to PR

src/v0/destinations/salesforce/utils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/v0/destinations/salesforce/utils.js Show resolved Hide resolved
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 requested a review from koladilip October 3, 2024 05:37
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2024 05:37
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 requested review from a team and sivashanmukh as code owners October 3, 2024 05:37
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 requested a review from sanpj2292 October 3, 2024 05:37
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 requested a review from sanpj2292 October 22, 2024 05:29
const matchErrorCode = (errorCode) =>
response && Array.isArray(response) && response.some((resp) => resp?.errorCode === errorCode);
if (status === 401 && authKey && matchErrorCode('INVALID_SESSION_ID')) {
const handleAuthError = (
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel we can rewrite the function in a simpler way like below

const handleAuthError = (
  errorCode,
  authKey,
  authorizationFlow,
  sourceMessage,
  destResponse,
  status,
) => {
  if (errorCode === 'INVALID_SESSION_ID') {
    let authErrCategory = '';
    if (authorizationFlow === OAUTH) {
      authErrCategory = getAuthErrCategoryFromStCode(status);
    } else {
      ACCESS_TOKEN_CACHE.del(authKey);
    }
    throw new RetryableError(
      `${DESTINATION} Request Failed - due to "INVALID_SESSION_ID", (${authErrCategory}) ${sourceMessage}`,
      500,
      destResponse,
      authErrCategory,
    );
  }

  throw new AbortedError(
    `${DESTINATION} Request Failed: "${status}" due to "${getErrorMessage(destResponse.response)}", (Aborted) ${sourceMessage}`,
    400,
    destResponse,
  );
};

Copy link

@shrouti1507
Copy link
Contributor Author

we are handling this in #3824

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants