Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use destination definition name in place of string for custom object #3737

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Contributor

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai commented Sep 16, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

Fix to use destination definition name in place of a hardcoded 'Salesforce-' string for custom object, allows the same flow for Salesforce Oauth destination also.

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-2664

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

We are removing the stringification of the external Id in the event payload, now the id goes in the same data type as it is sent.

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.68%. Comparing base (5db0bfb) to head (792531b).
Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3737      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.63%   88.68%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         592      594       +2     
  Lines       32206    32410     +204     
  Branches     7661     7731      +70     
==========================================
+ Hits        28545    28742     +197     
- Misses       3338     3347       +9     
+ Partials      323      321       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai requested review from sivashanmukh and a team as code owners September 16, 2024 17:17
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/processor/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/processor/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/processor/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/processor/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/processor/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/router/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/router/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/router/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/router/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/integrations/destinations/salesforce/router/data.ts Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai changed the title fix: use destination definition name in place of string for custom ob… fix: use destination definition name in place of string for custom object Sep 16, 2024
sanpj2292
sanpj2292 previously approved these changes Sep 16, 2024
Copy link

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai added the DO NOT MERGE Don't merge this PR without having discussion label Sep 20, 2024
@yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this as this is releasing in a regular release

@devops-github-rudderstack devops-github-rudderstack deleted the fix.sf.oauth.xustom.object branch December 19, 2024 01:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DO NOT MERGE Don't merge this PR without having discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants