Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: onboard adobe to proxy v1 tests #3163

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Contributor

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai commented Mar 4, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

Onboard adobe analytics to proxy v1 tests
Any new scenarios added = n/a

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-1477

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai self-assigned this Mar 4, 2024
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai requested review from sivashanmukh and a team as code owners March 4, 2024 19:59
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 4, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.63%. Comparing base (a0ca61b) to head (6139d91).
Report is 22 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3163      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    84.86%   87.63%   +2.77%     
===========================================
  Files          497      548      +51     
  Lines        27412    29559    +2147     
  Branches      6597     7046     +449     
===========================================
+ Hits         23262    25904    +2642     
+ Misses        3694     3317     -377     
+ Partials       456      338     -118     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@utsabc
Copy link
Member

utsabc commented Mar 12, 2024

Can we add other.ts scenarios tests as well?

@yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can we add other.ts scenarios tests as well?

We do not have possibility for other scenarios for Adobe, the scenarios are covered in business

utsabc
utsabc previously approved these changes Mar 15, 2024
shrouti1507
shrouti1507 previously approved these changes Mar 15, 2024
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai dismissed stale reviews from shrouti1507 and utsabc via 8995e81 March 15, 2024 08:53
@aashishmalik aashishmalik force-pushed the chore.adobe.analytics.proxy.tests branch from 8995e81 to 8fa9a01 Compare March 15, 2024 09:00
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai merged commit 2ad1239 into develop Mar 18, 2024
16 checks passed
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai deleted the chore.adobe.analytics.proxy.tests branch March 18, 2024 04:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants