Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: event fix and added utility #3142

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

fix: event fix and added utility #3142

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

aashishmalik
Copy link
Contributor

@aashishmalik aashishmalik commented Feb 28, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

Added a util function to ease the process of validating parameters and conversion to string.

Added util to check for

  1. event mandatory ?
  2. event exists ?
  3. event exists & not object
  4. lowercase conversion

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-XXX

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.89%. Comparing base (9afcd7b) to head (0582f0a).
Report is 18 commits behind head on develop.

Files Patch % Lines
src/v0/util/index.js 66.66% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3142      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    84.59%   84.89%   +0.29%     
===========================================
  Files          493      496       +3     
  Lines        27308    27339      +31     
  Branches      6576     6565      -11     
===========================================
+ Hits         23101    23209     +108     
+ Misses        3754     3706      -48     
+ Partials       453      424      -29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aashishmalik aashishmalik marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2024 14:58
@aashishmalik aashishmalik requested a review from a team as a code owner February 28, 2024 14:58
@aashishmalik aashishmalik changed the title fix: bugsnag fix and added utility fix:eventName fix and added utility Feb 28, 2024
@aashishmalik aashishmalik changed the title fix:eventName fix and added utility fix: event fix and added utility Feb 28, 2024
src/v0/util/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/v0/util/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
koladilip
koladilip previously approved these changes Feb 29, 2024
src/v0/util/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/v0/util/index.test.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Contributor

@aashishmalik can we use this general utility here?

@aashishmalik
Copy link
Contributor Author

aashishmalik commented Feb 29, 2024

@aashishmalik can we use this general utility here?

we will remove this as this is basic doesn't check if event is mandatory or not and lowercase conversion, as part of refactor we remove this one

@aashishmalik aashishmalik merged commit 9b705b7 into develop Feb 29, 2024
16 checks passed
@aashishmalik aashishmalik deleted the fix.added-ev-utility branch February 29, 2024 10:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants