Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: consent field support for gaoc for API v15 and upgrade the api version from v14 to v16 #3121

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

shrouti1507
Copy link
Contributor

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 commented Feb 23, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

  • upgrading API version of google API from v14 to v16
  • adding consent mode for gaoc, as released in v15

Details for GAOC consent mode feature :

  • we have extended a default / fallback consent mode choice from UI
  • for store conversion we entirely depend on the UI config consent mode
  • for click and call conversions we have extended a feature to support it via integrations object, and integrations object related consent mode is of higher priority over UI config
  • default value for consent is UNSPECIFIED
  • for any wrong consent value than the allowed values by google, we send consent as UNKNOWN

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-1348

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 self-assigned this Feb 23, 2024
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2024 13:14
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 requested review from a team and sivashanmukh as code owners February 23, 2024 13:14
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 23, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.71%. Comparing base (46e5797) to head (b013770).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3121      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    87.70%   87.71%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          550      550              
  Lines        29585    29616      +31     
  Branches      7056     7059       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits         25947    25978      +31     
- Misses        3302     3330      +28     
+ Partials       336      308      -28     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@coderabbitai review

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 requested a review from saikumarrs March 7, 2024 15:33
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 changed the title feat: consent field support for GAOC for API v15 feat: consent field support for GAOC for API v15 and upgrade the api version from v14 to v16 Mar 11, 2024
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 changed the title feat: consent field support for GAOC for API v15 and upgrade the api version from v14 to v16 feat: consent field support for gaoc for API v15 and upgrade the api version from v14 to v16 Mar 11, 2024
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 11, 2024
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 requested a review from krishna2020 March 12, 2024 08:04
ItsSudip
ItsSudip previously approved these changes Mar 12, 2024
saikumarrs
saikumarrs previously approved these changes Mar 12, 2024
krishna2020
krishna2020 previously approved these changes Mar 13, 2024
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 dismissed stale reviews from krishna2020 and saikumarrs via e05e730 March 13, 2024 13:52
krishna2020
krishna2020 previously approved these changes Mar 13, 2024
Copy link

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 merged commit 2aac2a6 into develop Mar 22, 2024
16 checks passed
@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 deleted the feat.consentMode.GAOC branch March 22, 2024 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants