fix: add check to remove empty properties object from payload #2896

ujjwal-ab · 2023-12-12T05:01:28Z

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

This PR add checks for removing empty properties object from the payload to avoid sending it to klaviyo

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Type of change

If the pull request is a bug-fix, enhancement or a refactor, please fill in the details on the changes made.

Existing capabilities/behavior
New capabilities/behavior

If the pull request is a new feature,

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

If the PR has changes in more than 10 files, please mention why the changes were not split into multiple PRs.

N/A

If multiple linear tasks are associated with the PR changes, please elaborate on the reason:

N/A

Developer checklist

No breaking changes are being introduced.
Are all related docs linked with the PR?
Are all changes manually tested?
Does this change require any documentation changes?
Are relevant unit and component test-cases added?

Reviewer checklist

Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?
Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

coderabbitai · 2023-12-12T05:01:33Z

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ?

Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (`@coderabbitai`)

If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)

You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

codecov · 2023-12-12T05:07:38Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (bf39215) 87.25% compared to head (14f66b2) 87.25%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2896   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    87.25%   87.25%           
========================================
  Files          791      791           
  Lines        29193    29195    +2     
  Branches      6831     6832    +1     
========================================
+ Hits         25471    25473    +2     
  Misses        3377     3377           
  Partials       345      345

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.