-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: active_campaign error handler #2895
Conversation
…error handler Signed-off-by: Sai Sankeerth <[email protected]>
Important Auto Review SkippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the To trigger a single review, invoke the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2895 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 87.25% 87.28% +0.02%
===========================================
Files 791 791
Lines 29195 29214 +19
Branches 6832 6832
===========================================
+ Hits 25473 25498 +25
+ Misses 3377 3372 -5
+ Partials 345 344 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Sai Sankeerth <[email protected]>
a0a0f78
…to fix.ac-error-handling
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
What are the changes introduced in this PR?
Whenever there are node errors like EAI_AGAIN, ECONNABORTED etc,. the error handler is not able to handle the error properly.
Through this PR we aim to fix it.
Resolves INT-1157
Please explain the objectives of your changes below
N/A
Type of change
If the pull request is a bug-fix, enhancement or a refactor, please fill in the details on the changes made.
If the pull request is a new feature,
Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?
N/A
Any new dependencies introduced with this change?
N/A
Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.
N/A
If the PR has changes in more than 10 files, please mention why the changes were not split into multiple PRs.
N/A
If multiple linear tasks are associated with the PR changes, please elaborate on the reason:
N/A
Developer checklist
No breaking changes are being introduced.
Are all related docs linked with the PR?
Are all changes manually tested?
Does this change require any documentation changes?
Are relevant unit and component test-cases added?
Reviewer checklist
Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?
Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.