Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: constants pr workflow to keep all steps under the same job #1834

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

koladilip
Copy link
Collaborator

@koladilip koladilip commented Dec 10, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

GH Actions workflows keep job isolated so they share same shell so all the context is gone so merging all steps into single job.

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-2930

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new checks got introduced or modified in test suites. Please explain the changes.

N/A


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • I have executed schemaGenerator tests and updated schema if needed

  • Are sensitive fields marked as secret in definition config?

  • My test cases and placeholders use only masked/sample values for sensitive fields

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes & one task?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated job name for improved clarity and functionality.
    • Streamlined workflow by consolidating steps for raising pull requests.

GH Actions workflows keep job isolated so they share same shell
so all the context is gone so merging all steps into single job.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml. It changes the job name from check_changes to check_changes_and_raise_pr, consolidating the logic for checking changes and raising pull requests into a single job. The previous output declaration for pr_required has been removed, and the workflow now directly integrates the logic for determining if a PR is needed. This adjustment simplifies the control flow and maintains the check for existing PRs to avoid duplicates.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml Job name changed from check_changes to check_changes_and_raise_pr; output handling simplified; logic for PR creation integrated into the job steps.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: add gh workflow for raising pr for constants #1832: The changes in this PR involve the introduction of a GitHub Actions workflow for raising pull requests related to constant files, which is directly related to the modifications made in the main PR that also focuses on enhancing the workflow for managing pull requests for constants.

Suggested reviewers

  • lvrach
  • RanjeetMishra
  • krishna2020
  • shrouti1507
  • ItsSudip
  • sandeepdsvs
  • saikumarrs
  • vinayteki95

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A workflow brightens, dispels the gloom.
No more confusion, all in one place,
Raising PRs now with elegance and grace.
Hopping along, we celebrate this feat,
A streamlined process, oh, what a treat! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (56831b3) to head (777e5d3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #1834   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           53        53           
  Branches         7         7           
=========================================
  Hits            53        53           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml (2)

Line range hint 48-54: Consider enhancing the commit message with more context

While the implementation is correct, the commit message could be more descriptive to better track the nature of the changes.

Consider this enhancement:

-          git commit -m "fix: update destinations.ts"
+          git commit -m "fix: update destinations.ts with latest integration constants [automated]"

Line range hint 57-76: Enhance PR metadata for better traceability

Consider these improvements to the PR creation:

  1. Add more specific PR title
  2. Include workflow run link in PR description
  3. Add additional relevant labels

Apply this enhancement:

             gh pr create \
-              --title "fix: update destination constants" \
+              --title "fix: update destination integration constants [automated]" \
               --body "This PR updates the destination constants file.

               **Changes:**
               - Updated \`Destinations.ts\` with latest constants
+              
+              **Workflow:**
+              - Generated by: ${GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID}
               
               This PR was automatically generated by GitHub Actions." \
-              --label "automated,dependencies"
+              --label "automated,dependencies,no-changelog-required"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56831b3 and 777e5d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml (2)

18-18: LGTM! Job name accurately reflects consolidated responsibilities

The renamed job check_changes_and_raise_pr clearly indicates its expanded scope, improving workflow readability while achieving the goal of maintaining context across steps.


Line range hint 7-8: LGTM! Required permissions are correctly configured

The workflow has the necessary contents: write and pull-requests: write permissions to perform all required operations.

✅ Verification successful

Permissions configuration is correctly set and verified

The workflow has the exact required permissions (contents: write and pull-requests: write) needed for:

  • Pushing changes to the branch (contents: write)
  • Creating/updating pull requests (pull-requests: write)

No other workflows in the repository use similar permissions, confirming this is a unique use case for this specific automation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify no other workflow files reference these permissions
rg -l 'permissions:.*contents:.*write' .github/workflows/ | grep -v 'raise-pr-for-constants.yml' || echo "No other workflows found with similar permissions"

Length of output: 205


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the actual permissions in the workflow file
cat .github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml

Length of output: 2724

Copy link
Member

@saikumarrs saikumarrs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You might want to convert this PR to a chore.

@koladilip koladilip merged commit e57aa07 into develop Dec 10, 2024
15 checks passed
@koladilip koladilip deleted the chore/fix-pr-raiser-workflow branch December 10, 2024 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants