-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: constants pr workflow to keep all steps under the same job #1834
Conversation
GH Actions workflows keep job isolated so they share same shell so all the context is gone so merging all steps into single job.
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1834 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 53 53
Branches 7 7
=========================================
Hits 53 53 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml (2)
Line range hint
48-54
: Consider enhancing the commit message with more contextWhile the implementation is correct, the commit message could be more descriptive to better track the nature of the changes.
Consider this enhancement:
- git commit -m "fix: update destinations.ts" + git commit -m "fix: update destinations.ts with latest integration constants [automated]"
Line range hint
57-76
: Enhance PR metadata for better traceabilityConsider these improvements to the PR creation:
- Add more specific PR title
- Include workflow run link in PR description
- Add additional relevant labels
Apply this enhancement:
gh pr create \ - --title "fix: update destination constants" \ + --title "fix: update destination integration constants [automated]" \ --body "This PR updates the destination constants file. **Changes:** - Updated \`Destinations.ts\` with latest constants + + **Workflow:** + - Generated by: ${GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/runs/${GITHUB_RUN_ID} This PR was automatically generated by GitHub Actions." \ - --label "automated,dependencies" + --label "automated,dependencies,no-changelog-required"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml (2)
18-18
: LGTM! Job name accurately reflects consolidated responsibilities
The renamed job check_changes_and_raise_pr
clearly indicates its expanded scope, improving workflow readability while achieving the goal of maintaining context across steps.
Line range hint 7-8
: LGTM! Required permissions are correctly configured
The workflow has the necessary contents: write
and pull-requests: write
permissions to perform all required operations.
✅ Verification successful
Permissions configuration is correctly set and verified
The workflow has the exact required permissions (contents: write
and pull-requests: write
) needed for:
- Pushing changes to the branch (
contents: write
) - Creating/updating pull requests (
pull-requests: write
)
No other workflows in the repository use similar permissions, confirming this is a unique use case for this specific automation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify no other workflow files reference these permissions
rg -l 'permissions:.*contents:.*write' .github/workflows/ | grep -v 'raise-pr-for-constants.yml' || echo "No other workflows found with similar permissions"
Length of output: 205
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the actual permissions in the workflow file
cat .github/workflows/raise-pr-for-constants.yml
Length of output: 2724
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You might want to convert this PR to a chore.
What are the changes introduced in this PR?
GH Actions workflows keep job isolated so they share same shell so all the context is gone so merging all steps into single job.
What is the related Linear task?
Resolves INT-2930
Please explain the objectives of your changes below
Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here
Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?
N/A
Any new dependencies introduced with this change?
N/A
Any new checks got introduced or modified in test suites. Please explain the changes.
N/A
Developer checklist
My code follows the style guidelines of this project
No breaking changes are being introduced.
All related docs linked with the PR?
All changes manually tested?
Any documentation changes needed with this change?
I have executed schemaGenerator tests and updated schema if needed
Are sensitive fields marked as secret in definition config?
My test cases and placeholders use only masked/sample values for sensitive fields
Is the PR limited to 10 file changes & one task?
Reviewer checklist
Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?
Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit