Use the right method to get graph_names #14
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Use RDF::Spec shared example
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use the right method to get graph_names
Use RDF::Spec shared example
Following the usage of RDF 2.0, instead of the #contexts method, we should now have the #graph_names method on Repositories. This inconsistent change induced the issue #13.
The RDF::Sesame::Repository API changed and the #contexts method became #graph_names, as it should have been to follow the new RDF 2.0 RDF::Repository API.
I added the inclusion of shared RDF 2.0 Repository specs.
K