chore: add local sequencer and docker file #20
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include updates to several files. A new entry has been added to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI
participant gRPCServer
User->>CLI: Run command with flags
CLI->>gRPCServer: Initialize with parameters
gRPCServer-->>CLI: Start listening
User->>gRPCServer: Send request
gRPCServer-->>User: Return response
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
RollkitBot
requested review from
a team,
tuxcanfly,
yarikbratashchuk and
Manav-Aggarwal
and removed request for
a team
gupadhyaya
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
cmd/local-sequencer/main.go (1)
16-20: Consider documenting constants and reviewing default values.The constants provide default values for the server configuration, which is good. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add comments to explain the purpose and implications of each constant.
- The default host "localhost" is secure but may limit accessibility. Ensure this aligns with the intended use case.
- The default rollup ID "rollup-id" seems generic. Consider if a more specific default would be appropriate.
Example documentation:
const ( // defaultHost is the default listening address. Set to localhost for security, // but this may need to be changed for certain use cases. defaultHost = "localhost" // defaultPort is the default gRPC port for the sequencer. defaultPort = "50051" // defaultRollupId is a placeholder. In production, this should be set to a meaningful value. defaultRollupId = "rollup-id" )Makefile (2)
1-1: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for the git commands.The LDFLAGS variable is well-defined and includes important version information. This is a good practice for tracking builds.
Consider adding error handling for the git commands. For example:
LDFLAGS=-ldflags="-X '$(versioningPath).buildTime=$(shell date)' -X '$(versioningPath).lastCommit=$(shell git rev-parse HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")' -X '$(versioningPath).semanticVersion=$(shell git describe --tags --dirty=-dev 2>/dev/null || git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")'"This ensures that the build doesn't fail if git commands are unavailable or if the repository is in an unexpected state.
11-15: LGTM! Consider specifying the main package explicitly.The 'build' target is well-defined and correctly uses the LDFLAGS variable. Good job on including a description and marking it as .PHONY.
Consider specifying the main package explicitly instead of using './...'. This ensures only the necessary code is compiled into the binary:
build: @echo "--> Building local-sequencer" @go build -o build/local-sequencer ${LDFLAGS} ./cmd/local-sequencerReplace './cmd/local-sequencer' with the actual path to your main package. This approach provides more control over what's being built and can potentially speed up the build process.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- Makefile (3 hunks)
- cmd/local-sequencer/main.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
cmd/local-sequencer/main.go (2)
1-14: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package is correctly declared as
mainfor an executable, and the imports include necessary standard library packages along with custom packages from the project. This setup looks good for the intended functionality of a local sequencer.
22-50:⚠️ Potential issueReview security implications and consider improvements.
The main function setup is generally well-structured, but there are some points to consider:
The "listen-all" flag allows the server to listen on all network interfaces. While this provides flexibility, it also introduces potential security risks. Ensure that this option is used cautiously and documented clearly.
The use of a dummy sequencer (
test.NewDummySequencer) suggests this might be for testing or development. If this is intended for production use, replace it with a proper implementation.Error handling is present for the network listener setup, which is good. However, consider adding more detailed error messages to aid in troubleshooting.
The server is started in a goroutine, but there's no error handling for
srv.Serve(lis). Consider adding error handling here.To verify the usage of the dummy sequencer, run the following script:
This will help determine if the dummy sequencer is used elsewhere, indicating whether it's a widespread testing utility or potentially misused in production code.
Makefile (2)
50-50: Great addition of Dockerfile linting!Adding 'hadolint' to check the Dockerfile is an excellent practice. This will help maintain Docker best practices and catch potential issues early.
Line range hint
1-50: Overall, excellent improvements to the Makefile!The changes you've made enhance the build process by including version information and improve code quality checks with additional linting. These updates will contribute to better maintainability and traceability of the project.
A few minor suggestions were made to further improve robustness and specificity, but the overall direction is very good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should add the docker CI ex:
https://github.com/rollkit/rollkit/blob/main/.github/workflows/docker-build-publish.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/docker-build-publish.yml (1)
17-20: LGTM: Reusable workflow is well-configured.The use of a reusable workflow promotes consistency and reduces duplication. The Dockerfile is correctly specified, and secrets are inherited as needed.
Consider using a more flexible version reference for the reusable workflow, such as
@v0.4or@v0, to automatically receive non-breaking updates. However, ensure this aligns with your team's stability and predictability requirements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/docker-build-publish.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/docker-build-publish.yml (3)
1-10: LGTM: Workflow name and triggers are well-defined.The workflow name accurately describes its purpose, and the trigger configuration is comprehensive. It covers main branch updates, version releases, and pull requests, ensuring the Docker image is built and tested for all relevant code changes.
12-16: Consider reviewing and potentially limiting the permissions.The job permissions are currently set to allow writing to both contents and packages. While this is likely necessary for building and publishing Docker images, it's generally a good practice to limit permissions to the minimum required for the task.
Could you review if both
contents: writeandpackages: writeare necessary for this workflow? If possible, consider limiting these permissions to enhance security.
1-20: Overall, the workflow is well-structured and fit for purpose.This GitHub Actions workflow file is correctly set up to build and publish Docker images. It covers all necessary triggers, uses a reusable workflow for consistency, and specifies the required permissions and Dockerfile.
The suggestions made in the review are for optimization and best practices rather than addressing critical issues. Consider implementing these suggestions to further improve the workflow's security and maintainability.
gupadhyaya
changed the title
Overview
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Chores
.gitignoreto exclude thebuild/directory from version control.