Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vismodel 'cie2' and 'cie10' do not accept 390:700 rspecdata #74

Open
bittonp opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #203
Open

vismodel 'cie2' and 'cie10' do not accept 390:700 rspecdata #74

bittonp opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #203

Comments

@bittonp
Copy link
Collaborator

bittonp commented Nov 17, 2017

Not a big issue: the vismodel parameter visual = 'cie2' and 'cie10' does not accept rspecdata that only ranges from 390:700 nm, only 300:700. Inexperienced researchers that mostly work with human visual system may not know how to get access and modify internal visual system data.

@wcornwell
Copy link

@bittonp any tips on a workaround for this?

@Bisaloo
Copy link
Collaborator

Bisaloo commented Nov 22, 2019

A very dirty workaround if you're in a hurry:

library(pavo)

## Create example data that cuts off at 390 nm
data(sicalis)
sicalis <- sicalis[sicalis$wl>=390, ]


## Recreate the 300-390nm range.
## WARNING: this fills the 300:390 wl range with bogus data. 
## It doesn't matter for vismodel() with cie visual system but 
## **it will be wrong for everything else**
sicalis <- as.rspec(sicalis, lim = c(300, 700), exceed.range = TRUE)

vismodel(sicalis, visual = "cie10")

@wcornwell
Copy link

quick and dirty! Thank you! 👏

Bisaloo added a commit to Bisaloo/pavo that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2020
@Bisaloo Bisaloo linked a pull request Jun 11, 2020 that will close this issue
Bisaloo added a commit to Bisaloo/pavo that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants