Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support certs with GeneralTime #167

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

omertuc
Copy link
Member

@omertuc omertuc commented Oct 10, 2024

Background

Recert until now only supported certs with asn1 UTCTime and not GeneralizedTime.

Problem

When golang creates certs with expiration way out in the future, it uses GeneralizedTime instead of UTCTime.

For example:

    4:d=2  hl=2 l=  13 prim: UTCTIME           :240607174402Z
   19:d=2  hl=2 l=  17 prim: UTCTIME           :340605194402+0200

vs

    4:d=2  hl=2 l=  13 prim: UTCTIME           :240607174406Z
   19:d=2  hl=2 l=  19 prim: GENERALIZEDTIME   :21240514194406+0200

Usually this is not a problem, because a typical OCP cluster doesn't have certs this far in the future, but eventually it will become a problem. Also RHOAI has a component (tektoncd) that has certs with expiry 100 years in the future (despite the misleading name that says "Decade" rather than "Century").

Trying to recert a cluster with tektoncd will therefore lead to the following error:

error: |-
  scanning and recertification

  Caused by:
      0: processing discovered objects
      1: regenerating crypto
      2: re-signing cert with subject CN=tekton-triggers-core-interceptors.openshift-pipelines.svc, O=knative.dev
      3: mutating cert
      4: extending expiration
      5: forcefully expiring
      6: evaluating current expiration
      7: GeneralTime not supported

Solution

This PR adds support for asn1 generalized time in recert. It's simply a matter of casting the type correctly, the x509_certificate crate already supports it.

Testing

This PR is untested, waiting for feedback from the user that reported the issue.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mresvanis and tsorya October 10, 2024 09:25
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: omertuc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

# Background

Recert until now only supported certs with asn1 `UTCTime` and not
`GeneralizedTime`.

# Problem

When golang creates certs with expiration way out in the future, it uses
`GeneralizedTime` instead of `UTCTime`.

For example:

```
    4:d=2  hl=2 l=  13 prim: UTCTIME           :240607174402Z
   19:d=2  hl=2 l=  17 prim: UTCTIME           :340605194402+0200
```

vs

```
    4:d=2  hl=2 l=  13 prim: UTCTIME           :240607174406Z
   19:d=2  hl=2 l=  19 prim: GENERALIZEDTIME   :21240514194406+0200
```

Usually this is not a problem, because a typical OCP cluster doesn't
have certs this far in the future, but eventually it will become a
problem. Also RHOAI has a component (tektoncd) that has certs with
expiry 100 years in the future [1] (despite the misleading name that
says "Decade" rather than "Century").

Trying to recert a cluster with tektoncd will therefore lead to the
following error:

```
error: |-
  scanning and recertification

  Caused by:
      0: processing discovered objects
      1: regenerating crypto
      2: re-signing cert with subject CN=tekton-triggers-core-interceptors.openshift-pipelines.svc, O=knative.dev
      3: mutating cert
      4: extending expiration
      5: forcefully expiring
      6: evaluating current expiration
      7: GeneralTime not supported
```

# Solution

This PR adds support for asn1 generalized time in recert. It's simply a
matter of casting the type correctly, the x509_certificate crate already
supports it.

# Testing

This PR is untested, waiting for feedback from the user that reported
the issue.

[1] https://github.com/tektoncd/triggers/blob/59da11dd50424c9ccef883b558671e34efc0eba5/pkg/interceptors/server/server.go#L36
omertuc added a commit to omertuc/triggers that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
We had an issue [1] with long expiration so I noticed the name was wrong

[1] rh-ecosystem-edge/recert#167
omertuc added a commit to omertuc/triggers that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
We had an issue [1] with long expiration so I noticed the name was wrong

[1] rh-ecosystem-edge/recert#167
omertuc added a commit to omertuc/triggers that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
We had an issue [1] with long expiration so I noticed the name was wrong

[1] rh-ecosystem-edge/recert#167

Signed-off-by: Omer Tuchfeld <[email protected]>
tekton-robot pushed a commit to tektoncd/triggers that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
We had an issue [1] with long expiration so I noticed the name was wrong

[1] rh-ecosystem-edge/recert#167

Signed-off-by: Omer Tuchfeld <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant