-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(feat) Add masking to python middleware #955
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9e5cb3a
Add masking to python middleware
3efa55b
add a test for mask
llimllib 990725b
Authentication -> Authorization
llimllib 7972aab
simplify imports
llimllib 5f533d0
don't need get here
llimllib 1389528
fix redact typing
llimllib a605487
simplify redaction
llimllib aae9565
fix tests authentication -> authorization
llimllib cb8f47b
Merge branch 'main' into add-python-hashing
AndriiAndreiev 450ddd7
fix makefile syntax
AndriiAndreiev 1723149
Fix failing tests
AndriiAndreiev 6b07295
Fix lint issues
AndriiAndreiev ca2baee
Fix lint issue
AndriiAndreiev 9883284
Fix test mask
AndriiAndreiev 928640b
Change Authorization header masking logic
AndriiAndreiev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
at this point, if there is an
Authorization
header, won't there already be an unmasked Authorization header inpayload["headers"]
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be my expectation too - does
.append
overwrite the existing header here, or do we need to forcefully delete it?