-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Split the workflows into catalog.yml, client.yml, and lambdas.yml #3866
base: ci_pylint_isort
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
It makes more sense than JS vs Python, and lets us filter by paths and skip unnecessary testing.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## ci_pylint_isort #3866 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage 35.59% 35.59%
================================================
Files 711 711
Lines 31347 31347
Branches 4681 4681
================================================
Hits 11157 11157
Misses 19034 19034
Partials 1156 1156
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
paths: | ||
- '.github/workflows/catalog.yml' | ||
- 'catalog/**' | ||
- 'shared/**' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nl0: does anything besides the catalog depend on this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no, i don't think so
- '.github/workflows/lambdas.yml' | ||
- 'lambdas/**' | ||
jobs: | ||
linter: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of copy-paste you might want this: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/reusing-workflows
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we might want to use yaml
extension as it's recommended in https://yaml.org/faq.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lint-docs
job is not really related to catalog
paths: | ||
- '.github/workflows/catalog.yml' | ||
- 'catalog/**' | ||
- 'shared/**' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that doesn't work well with required jobs (you can see them in repo settings -> branches -> master)
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions
If a workflow is skipped due to branch filtering, path filtering, or a commit message, then checks associated with that workflow will remain in a "Pending" state. A pull request that requires those checks to be successful will be blocked from merging.
you can check registry workflow in enterprise for idea on how to implement filtering
also I suggest testing this CI stuff in a fork
It makes more sense than JS vs Python, and lets us filter by paths and skip unnecessary testing.