Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes to completions #355

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Secrus
Copy link
Member

@Secrus Secrus commented Aug 20, 2023

Closes: #231

# FIXME: when generating completions via `python -m script completions`,
# we incorrectly infer `script_name` as `__main__.py`
script_name = self._io.input.script_name or inspect.stack()[-1][1]
script_name = self._io.input.script_name or self._get_prog_name_from_stack()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did this work for you? ik it works for click, but would need tweaking

what about unifying the logic from the help command, which prefers self._application.name if defined? that feels more consistent and what I would expect:

if self._application:
current_script = self._application.name
else:
current_script = inspect.stack()[-1][1]

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have only tested the _get_prog_name_from_stack method and it has returned the proper module name. Aplication.name is not always good, because you might have your program aliased on shell level (like having pipx installation with suffix).

*[
f"complete -c {script_name} -A "
f"-n '__fish_seen_subcommand_from {sanitize(command_name)}' "
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just to make sure I understand, the syntax error was already fixed here with 6cc808d right? we just haven't had a release since then

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, the fix was making '__fish_seen_subcommand_from \'command name\'' entry, while this fix changes it to being '__fish_seen_subcommand_from "command name"' which feels like a more "proper" way to nest quotes.

@Secrus
Copy link
Member Author

Secrus commented Oct 25, 2023

Superseded by #358

@Secrus Secrus closed this Oct 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

completions: support generation when running as module
2 participants