Add fail-fast for dicts, model and dataclass

[uriyyo]

Change Summary

Add fail-fast feature to:

• dict
• typed-dict
• dataclass-arguments
• model-fields

Related issue number

#1345

Checklist

• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
• Pydantic tests pass with this pydantic-core (except for expected changes)
• My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

[uriyyo]

please review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.44444% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.60%. Comparing base (ab503cb) to head (5dd9abd).
Report is 230 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/validators/dict.rs	87.50%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/validators/typed_dict.rs	88.88%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1543      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.21%   89.60%   -0.61%     
==========================================
  Files         106      112       +6     
  Lines       16339    17931    +1592     
  Branches       36       40       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        14740    16067    +1327     
- Misses       1592     1844     +252     
- Partials        7       20      +13     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
python/pydantic_core/core_schema.py	94.86% <100.00%> (+0.10%)	⬆️
src/validators/dataclass.rs	89.31% <100.00%> (-9.07%)	⬇️
src/validators/model_fields.rs	95.18% <100.00%> (-1.29%)	⬇️
src/validators/dict.rs	96.84% <87.50%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
src/validators/typed_dict.rs	89.66% <88.88%> (-2.39%)	⬇️

... and 49 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6472887...5dd9abd. Read the comment docs.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1543 will not alter performance

_{Comparing uriyyo:more-fail-fast (5dd9abd) with main (6472887)}

Summary

✅ 155 untouched benchmarks

[uriyyo]

After implementing this feature I thought maybe it's make sense to add kinda validation context structure to not duplicate fail-fast check logic, it can look like this:

struct ValidationContext {
    fail_fast: bool,
    errors: Vec<ValLineError>,
}

impl ValidationContext {
    fn new(fail_fast: bool) -> Self {
        Self {
            fail_fast,
            errors: Vec::new(),
        }
    }

    fn default() -> Self {
        return Self::new(false);
    }

    fn should_stop(self) -> bool {
        self.fail_fast && self.has_errors()
    }

    fn has_errors(self) -> bool {
        !self.errors.is_empty()
    }

    fn add_error(mut self, error: ValLineError) {
        self.errors.push(error);
    }
}