Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[abid] remove ufw role #5644

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

[abid] remove ufw role #5644

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

kayiwa
Copy link
Member

@kayiwa kayiwa commented Dec 18, 2024

we will use sandboxes for our ufw experiments this makes abid staging
stay up

@acozine
Copy link
Contributor

acozine commented Dec 18, 2024

Should we also remove the UFW rules from group_vars for abid-staging? See lines 3 and following.

@dphillips-39 dphillips-39 self-assigned this Dec 18, 2024
@kayiwa kayiwa requested a review from dphillips-39 December 18, 2024 21:16
kayiwa and others added 2 commits December 18, 2024 16:17
we will use sandboxes for our ufw experiments this makes abid staging
stay up
@kayiwa kayiwa force-pushed the i5520_ip_tables_removal branch from ab17e71 to 5714ba1 Compare December 18, 2024 21:17
@kayiwa kayiwa merged commit 0f296e4 into main Dec 19, 2024
74 checks passed
@kayiwa kayiwa deleted the i5520_ip_tables_removal branch December 19, 2024 02:09
kayiwa added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
* use sandboxes for ufw work

we will use sandboxes for our ufw experiments this makes abid staging
stay up

* remove the ufw rules for abid
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants