Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PodDisruptionBudget(PDB) for relations and spiceDB #229

Conversation

Rajagopalan-Ranganathan
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add a PDB for relations and spiceDB
  • Minimum of 1 pod available as a PDB

PR Template:

Describe your changes

  • ...

Ticket reference (if applicable)

Fixes #

Checklist

  • Are the agreed upon acceptance criteria fulfilled?

  • Was the 4-eye-principle applied? (async PR review, pairing, ensembling)

  • Do your changes have passing automated tests and sufficient observability?

  • Are the work steps you introduced repeatable by others, either through automation or documentation?

    • If automation is possible but not done due to other constraints, a ticket to the tech debt sprint is added
    • An SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) was created
  • The Changes were automatically built, tested, and - if needed, behind a feature flag - deployed to our production environment. (Please check this when the new deployment is done and you could verify it.)

  • Are the agreed upon coding/architectural practices applied?

  • Are security needs fullfilled? (e.g. no internal URL)

  • Is the corresponding Ticket in the right state? (should be on "review" now, put to done when this change made it to production)

  • For changes to the public API / code dependencies: Was the whole team (or a sufficient amount of ppl) able to review?

- Add a PDB for relations and spiceDB
- Minimum of 1 pod available as a PDB
Copy link
Contributor

@lennysgarage lennysgarage left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm - lint error is unrelated

@Rajagopalan-Ranganathan Rajagopalan-Ranganathan merged commit 031e7b4 into project-kessel:main Oct 16, 2024
9 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants