You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
Bug
What is the current behavior?
Some corner cases not covered:
VoltageControl::findVoltageControlsSortedByPriority only checks if the controlled bus is disabled or all the controller buses are disabled, and does not check LfBus::isGeneratorVoltageControlEnabled(). All the controller buses can be enabled but with all the connected generators in contingency.
For a newly disabled branch which is a voltage controller, the corresponding voltage control can be selected as the main one if its target voltage is the highest for its type. If it is the main one, we dismiss it later, in VoltageLevel::findVoltageControlsSortedByPriority: the control is considered disabled, and then we don't consider any voltage control of that type.
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
To support corner cases, and cover them in unit tests. Or clarify why it could not happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
Bug
What is the current behavior?
Some corner cases not covered:
VoltageControl::findVoltageControlsSortedByPriority
only checks if the controlled bus is disabled or all the controller buses are disabled, and does not checkLfBus::isGeneratorVoltageControlEnabled()
. All the controller buses can be enabled but with all the connected generators in contingency.VoltageLevel::findVoltageControlsSortedByPriority
: the control is considered disabled, and then we don't consider any voltage control of that type.What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
To support corner cases, and cover them in unit tests. Or clarify why it could not happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: