Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Documentation Typos #20

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: polymer-develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

savvar9991
Copy link

-Fixed typo in configuration description:
-Changed "notes" to "nodes" in polling configuration description
-Documentation path corrections:
-Updated docker-compose link from indexer/docker-compose.yml to ops-bedrock/docker-compose.yml
-Fixed "setup" to "set up" where appropriate
-Changed "can be ran" to "can be run" in testing section
-Fixed spacing in make devnet-allocs command reference
-Improved wording around health server description (changed "adjacently" to "adjacent")
-Fixed "TDB" typo to "TBD" in API documentation
-Corrected "exposes" to "expose" in metrics section

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in the indexer/README.md file consist of grammatical corrections and minor rephrasing aimed at improving clarity. Specific adjustments include corrections to phrases, verb forms, file paths, and abbreviations, all contributing to enhanced readability without affecting the functionality or structure of the documentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
indexer/README.md Grammatical corrections and rephrasing; updated file path for docker-compose.yml; corrected "TDB" to "TBD"; changed "adjacently" to "adjacent"; modified "services" to "service".

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
indexer/README.md (1)

63-63: Grammar and punctuation improvements needed

While changing "adjacently" to "adjacent" improves clarity, there's an additional improvement needed:

The abbreviation "ie." should be properly formatted as "i.e." (with periods):

-The health assessment doesn't check dependency health (ie. database) but rather checks the health of the indexer service itself.
+The health assessment doesn't check dependency health (i.e., database) but rather checks the health of the indexer service itself.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~63-~63: The abbreviation “i.e.” (= that is) requires two periods.
Context: ...ssment doesn't check dependency health (ie. database) but rather checks the health ...

(I_E)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1dda9b and 6c16c17.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • indexer/README.md (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
indexer/README.md

[uncategorized] ~63-~63: The abbreviation “i.e.” (= that is) requires two periods.
Context: ...ssment doesn't check dependency health (ie. database) but rather checks the health ...

(I_E)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
indexer/README.md (5)

8-8: LGTM: Correct technical terminology

The change from "notes" to "nodes" accurately reflects the technical terminology for blockchain network participants.


11-13: LGTM: Improved grammar and formatting

The changes improve readability while maintaining technical accuracy:

  • Correct grammar: "can be run" instead of "can be ran"
  • Better formatted command reference

43-43: LGTM: Corrected abbreviation

Fixed typo from "TDB" to "TBD" (To Be Determined).


66-66: LGTM: Correct subject-verb agreement

The grammatical correction maintains technical accuracy while improving readability.


16-16: Verify the updated docker-compose.yml path

The path update from indexer/docker-compose.yml to ops-bedrock/docker-compose.yml needs verification.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant