Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PAN-1990] Read transfer data from destination blockchain #21

Conversation

danut13
Copy link
Member

@danut13 danut13 commented Jul 10, 2024

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • Refactor
  • Feature
  • Test(s)
  • Bug Fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update

Description

Read transfer data from destination blockchain

@danut13 danut13 requested review from chandraprakash and jacekv July 10, 2024 09:40
@danut13 danut13 self-assigned this Jul 10, 2024
@danut13 danut13 requested a review from markuslevonyak as a code owner July 10, 2024 09:40
@danut13 danut13 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 10, 2024
@markuslevonyak markuslevonyak changed the title feat: read transfer data from destination blockchain [PAN-1990] Read transfer data from destination blockchain Jul 10, 2024
@danut13 danut13 force-pushed the PAN-1990-read-transfer-data-from-destination-blockchain branch from 58572d6 to 202e1c1 Compare July 10, 2024 13:34
@danut13 danut13 requested a review from markuslevonyak July 10, 2024 14:16
tests/conftest.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@danut13 danut13 force-pushed the PAN-1990-read-transfer-data-from-destination-blockchain branch from 202e1c1 to 65beb7b Compare July 10, 2024 14:33
@danut13 danut13 requested a review from markuslevonyak July 10, 2024 14:34
@danut13 danut13 merged commit 6aabd2c into pantos-io:main Jul 11, 2024
10 checks passed
@danut13 danut13 deleted the PAN-1990-read-transfer-data-from-destination-blockchain branch July 11, 2024 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants