🗃️ HRIS Vertical #638
🗃️ HRIS Vertical #638
Conversation
|
Qovery can create a Preview Environment for this PR.
This comment has been generated from Qovery AI 🤖.
|
|
|
Rachid Flih seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped as selected files did not have any reviewable changes. Files selected but had no reviewable changes (2)
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes introduce significant enhancements across multiple components, particularly focusing on improving database schema with better timezone management and the addition of new HRIS models. The API has been refined for clarity and type safety in TypeScript, with updates to authentication methods for improved security. Furthermore, the project emphasizes productivity-focused integrations, reflecting a strategic shift in operational capabilities, alongside updates to documentation for accuracy. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant HRIS
participant Database
User->>API: Request HRIS data
API->>HRIS: Sync data
HRIS-->>API: Return HRIS data
API->>Database: Save synced data
Database-->>API: Confirm save
API-->>User: Send HRIS data response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docker-compose.dev.ymlis excluded by!**/*.ymlpackages/api/swagger/swagger-spec.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (3)
- docs/syncwithCode.sh (1 hunks)
- packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma (35 hunks)
- packages/api/scripts/init.sql (39 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
docs/syncwithCode.sh (1)
17-17: Section Header Updated: Ensure Documentation Alignment.The section header was changed from
# File Storageto# Ecommerce, indicating a shift in focus. Ensure that the documentation content aligns with this new focus.packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma (2)
19-20: Improved Date-Time Handling with Timezone Support.The change from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)for date-time fields enhances the system's capability to manage time-sensitive data across different time zones.Also applies to: 34-37, 108-109, 133-134, 148-149, 172-173, 194-195, 217-218, 232-233, 251-252, 260-261, 272-273, 298-299, 315-318, 339-340, 391-391, 415-415, 462-462, 472-473, 487-488, 509-510, 529-530, 550-551, 567-568, 607-608, 627-628, 650-652, 697-698, 705-708, 721-722, 737-738, 755-756, 1055-1056, 1066-1067
1771-2113: New HRIS Models Introduced.The introduction of new HRIS models, such as
hris_bank_infos,hris_benefits, and others, significantly enhances the schema's capability to manage employee-related data. Ensure that these models are integrated and utilized effectively within the application.packages/api/scripts/init.sql (8)
31-34: Good update to handle time zones.Changing
created_atandlast_updatetotimestamp with time zoneensures accurate time handling across different time zones.
52-53: Consistent use of time zones.The update to
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_ataligns with best practices for handling time-sensitive data.
78-79: Consistent time zone handling.Updating
created_atandmodified_attotimestamp with time zoneensures consistency across the database schema.
111-112: Consistent time zone update.The change to
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atis consistent with the schema's time zone handling strategy.
126-127: Consistent time zone usage.Updating
created_atandmodified_attotimestamp with time zoneensures consistent handling of time-related data.
141-141: Consistent time zone handling.Changing
created_attotimestamp with time zonealigns with the schema's strategy for handling time zones.
158-159: Consistent time zone usage.The update to
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atensures accurate time tracking across time zones.
165-183: Well-structured HRIS tables with time zone handling.The introduction of new HRIS-related tables with
timestamp with time zonefor time-related fields is a robust addition, ensuring consistent handling of time-sensitive HR data.Also applies to: 189-205, 207-219, 221-241, 244-258, 261-275, 278-292, 970-1011, 1643-1663, 1665-1685, 1687-1721, 1722-1742, 1752-1781, 1782-1802, 1812-1833, 2428-2445, 2447-2463, 2465-2482
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/api/scripts/init.sql (39 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/api/scripts/init.sql (3)
31-34: Timestamp fields updated to include time zone information.The changes to use
timestamp with time zoneensure accurate time tracking across different time zones. This is a good practice for applications with global reach.Also applies to: 52-53, 78-79, 111-112, 126-127, 141-141, 158-159, 897-902, 910-911, 936-937, 1097-1098, 1120-1121, 1921-1922, 1948-1949, 1957-1958, 1982-1983, 2008-2009, 2050-2051, 2593-2594, 2739-2741, 2780-2780
165-185: New HRIS tables added.The new tables for HRIS functionalities are well-structured and align with the objectives of managing employee data, payroll, and time tracking effectively.
Also applies to: 189-205, 971-1012, 1723-1743, 2429-2442, 2448-2460, 2466-2479
1005-1008: New indices and constraints added for HRIS tables.The indices and constraints enhance data retrieval efficiency and maintain relational integrity across the new HRIS tables.
Also applies to: 1661-1664, 1683-1686, 1744-1751, 2443-2446, 2461-2464, 2480-2483
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/api/scripts/init.sql (39 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
packages/api/scripts/init.sql (5)
31-34: Good practice: Use oftimestamp with time zone.The change to use
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandlast_updatein thewebhook_endpointstable is a good practice for handling time data in distributed systems.
52-53: Good practice: Use oftimestamp with time zone.The change to use
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atin theuserstable is a good practice for handling time data in distributed systems.
78-79: Good practice: Use oftimestamp with time zone.The change to use
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atin thetcg_userstable is a good practice for handling time data in distributed systems.
111-112: Good practice: Use oftimestamp with time zone.The change to use
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atin thetcg_collectionstable is a good practice for handling time data in distributed systems.
165-185: Well-structured HRIS tables withtimestamp with time zone.The new HRIS tables are well-structured and consistently use
timestamp with time zonefor time-related fields, which is a good practice for managing time data in distributed systems.Also applies to: 189-205, 972-1005, 1645-1661, 2430-2443, 2449-2461, 2467-2480
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 18
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/api/swagger/swagger-spec.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (35)
- packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma (35 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/account/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/address/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/attachment/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/balancesheet/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/cashflowstatement/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/companyinfo/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/contact/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/creditnote/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/expense/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/incomestatement/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/invoice/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/item/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/journalentry/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/payment/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/phonenumber/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/purchaseorder/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/taxrate/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/trackingcategory/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/transaction/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/vendorcredit/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/bankinfo/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/benefit/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/company/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/dependent/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/employee/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/employeepayrollrun/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/employerbenefit/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/employment/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/group/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/location/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/paygroup/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/payrollrun/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/timeoff/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/timeoffbalance/types/model.unified.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (289)
packages/api/src/accounting/attachment/types/model.unified.ts (7)
11-19: Ensure consistent use of validation decorators.The
file_nameproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate. Ensure similar consistency across other properties.
21-29: Ensure URL validation is appropriate.The
file_urlproperty uses@IsUrl()and@IsOptional(), which is suitable for a URL field. Ensure that URLs are validated correctly in other parts of the codebase as well.
31-39: UUID validation is correctly applied.The
account_idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUID fields. Ensure UUIDs are validated consistently across the application.
56-64: UUID validation is correctly applied.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUID fields. Ensure UUIDs are validated consistently across the application.
66-75: Ensure remote ID validation is appropriate.The
remote_idproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is suitable for a string ID. Ensure similar consistency across other properties.
91-99: Date string validation is correctly applied.The
created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date fields. Ensure date strings are validated consistently across the application.
101-109: Date string validation is correctly applied.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date fields. Ensure date strings are validated consistently across the application.packages/api/src/hris/paygroup/types/model.unified.ts (7)
11-19: Ensure consistent use of validation decorators.The
pay_group_nameproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate. Ensure similar consistency across other properties.
36-44: UUID validation is correctly applied.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUID fields. Ensure UUIDs are validated consistently across the application.
46-55: Ensure remote ID validation is appropriate.The
remote_idproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is suitable for a string ID. Ensure similar consistency across other properties.
71-80: Date string validation is correctly applied.The
remote_created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date fields. Ensure date strings are validated consistently across the application.
82-90: Date string validation is correctly applied.The
created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date fields. Ensure date strings are validated consistently across the application.
92-100: Date string validation is correctly applied.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date fields. Ensure date strings are validated consistently across the application.
102-110: Boolean validation is correctly applied.The
remote_was_deletedproperty uses@IsBoolean()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for boolean fields. Ensure boolean fields are validated consistently across the application.packages/api/src/accounting/phonenumber/types/model.unified.ts (8)
5-13: Ensure consistent use of validation decorators.The
numberproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate. Ensure similar consistency across other properties.
15-23: Ensure consistent use of validation decorators.The
typeproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate. Ensure similar consistency across other properties.
25-33: UUID validation is correctly applied.The
id_acc_company_infoproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUID fields. Ensure UUIDs are validated consistently across the application.
35-42: UUID validation is correctly applied.The
id_acc_contactproperty uses@IsUUID(), which is appropriate for UUID fields. Ensure UUIDs are validated consistently across the application.
58-67: UUID validation is correctly applied.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUID fields. Ensure UUIDs are validated consistently across the application.
69-78: Ensure remote ID validation is appropriate.The
remote_idproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is suitable for a string ID. Ensure similar consistency across other properties.
94-102: Date string validation is correctly applied.The
created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date fields. Ensure date strings are validated consistently across the application.
104-112: Date string validation is correctly applied.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date fields. Ensure date strings are validated consistently across the application.packages/api/src/accounting/trackingcategory/types/model.unified.ts (10)
5-13: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
nameproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties across the file maintain consistent documentation and validation.
15-23: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
statusproperty is well-documented and validated. Maintain this level of detail for similar properties.
25-33: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
category_typeproperty is well-documented and validated. Consistency in documentation is crucial for API consumers.
35-43: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
parent_categoryproperty is appropriately documented and validated as a UUID. This is important for data integrity.
45-56: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
field_mappingsproperty is documented and validated as an optional object. Ensure similar properties are consistently documented.
60-68: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
idproperty is well-documented and validated as a UUID. Consistency with other UUID properties is maintained.
70-79: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
remote_idproperty is documented and validated as a string. This is consistent with other string properties.
81-93: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
remote_dataproperty is documented and validated as an optional object. Consistency with similar properties is maintained.
95-103: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
created_atproperty is well-documented and validated as a date string. Ensure similar properties across the file are consistent.
105-113: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
modified_atproperty is documented and validated as a date string. Consistency with other date string properties is maintained.packages/api/src/accounting/taxrate/types/model.unified.ts (9)
11-19: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
descriptionproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure similar properties maintain this level of detail.
31-39: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
effective_tax_rateproperty is well-documented and validated. Consistency with similar properties is maintained.
41-49: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
companyproperty is appropriately documented and validated as a UUID. This is important for data integrity.
51-62: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
field_mappingsproperty is documented and validated as an optional object. Consistency with similar properties is maintained.
66-74: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
idproperty is well-documented and validated as a UUID. Consistency with other UUID properties is maintained.
76-85: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
remote_idproperty is documented and validated as a string. This is consistent with other string properties.
87-99: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
remote_dataproperty is documented and validated as an optional object. Consistency with similar properties is maintained.
101-109: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
created_atproperty is well-documented and validated as a date string. Ensure similar properties across the file are consistent.
111-119: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
modified_atproperty is documented and validated as a date string. Consistency with other date string properties is maintained.packages/api/src/hris/group/types/model.unified.ts (11)
11-19: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
parent_groupproperty is well-documented and validated as a UUID. This is important for data integrity.
21-29: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
nameproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure similar properties maintain this level of detail.
31-39: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
typeproperty is well-documented and validated. Consistency with similar properties is maintained.
41-52: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
field_mappingsproperty is documented and validated as an optional object. Consistency with similar properties is maintained.
56-64: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
idproperty is well-documented and validated as a UUID. Consistency with other UUID properties is maintained.
66-74: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
remote_idproperty is documented and validated as a string. This is consistent with other string properties.
76-87: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
remote_dataproperty is documented and validated as an optional object. Consistency with similar properties is maintained.
89-97: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
remote_created_atproperty is well-documented and validated as a date string. Ensure similar properties across the file are consistent.
99-107: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
created_atproperty is well-documented and validated as a date string. Consistency with other date string properties is maintained.
109-117: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
modified_atproperty is documented and validated as a date string. Consistency with other date string properties is maintained.
119-127: Ensure Consistency in API Documentation.The
remote_was_deletedproperty is well-documented and validated as a boolean. Ensure similar properties maintain this level of detail.packages/api/src/hris/company/types/model.unified.ts (7)
12-20: Consider using@IsOptionalconsistently.The
@IsOptional()decorator is correctly used for optional properties. Ensure all properties that are optional have this decorator for consistency.
32-41: Validate array elements.The
einsproperty correctly uses@IsArray()and@IsString({ each: true })to validate that each element in the array is a string.
43-54: Ensure flexibility withfield_mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty uses a flexible type (Record<string, any>), which is appropriate for custom mappings. Ensure that any usage of this property accounts for its dynamic nature.
58-66: UUID validation forid.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()for validation, which is appropriate for a UUID string.
92-101: Use ofRecord<string, any>forremote_data.The
remote_dataproperty uses a flexible type, which is suitable for storing additional data. Ensure that this flexibility is handled appropriately in the application logic.
102-111: Date string validation.The properties
remote_created_at,created_at, andmodified_atuse@IsDateString()for validation, ensuring they are valid date strings.
123-131: Boolean validation forremote_was_deleted.The
remote_was_deletedproperty uses@IsBoolean()for validation, which is appropriate for a boolean value.packages/api/src/hris/timeoffbalance/types/model.unified.ts (9)
12-20: Number validation forbalance.The
balanceproperty uses@IsNumber()for validation, which is appropriate for a numeric value.
22-30: UUID validation foremployee_id.The
employee_idproperty uses@IsUUID()for validation, ensuring it is a valid UUID string.
32-40: Number validation forused.The
usedproperty uses@IsNumber()for validation, which is appropriate for a numeric value.
42-50: String validation forpolicy_type.The
policy_typeproperty uses@IsString()for validation, ensuring it is a valid string.
52-63: Ensure flexibility withfield_mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty uses a flexible type (Record<string, any>), which is appropriate for custom mappings. Ensure that any usage of this property accounts for its dynamic nature.
66-75: UUID validation forid.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()for validation, which is appropriate for a UUID string.
88-101: Use ofRecord<string, any>forremote_data.The
remote_dataproperty uses a flexible type, which is suitable for storing additional data. Ensure that this flexibility is handled appropriately in the application logic.
102-111: Date string validation.The properties
remote_created_at,created_at, andmodified_atuse@IsDateString()for validation, ensuring they are valid date strings.
133-142: Boolean validation forremote_was_deleted.The
remote_was_deletedproperty uses@IsBoolean()for validation, which is appropriate for a boolean value.packages/api/src/hris/bankinfo/types/model.unified.ts (10)
11-19: String validation foraccount_type.The
account_typeproperty uses@IsString()for validation, ensuring it is a valid string.
21-29: String validation forbank_name.The
bank_nameproperty uses@IsString()for validation, ensuring it is a valid string.
31-39: String validation foraccount_number.The
account_numberproperty uses@IsString()for validation, ensuring it is a valid string.
41-49: String validation forrouting_number.The
routing_numberproperty uses@IsString()for validation, ensuring it is a valid string.
51-59: UUID validation foremployee_id.The
employee_idproperty uses@IsUUID()for validation, ensuring it is a valid UUID string.
61-72: Ensure flexibility withfield_mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty uses a flexible type (Record<string, any>), which is appropriate for custom mappings. Ensure that any usage of this property accounts for its dynamic nature.
75-83: UUID validation forid.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()for validation, which is appropriate for a UUID string.
96-108: Use ofRecord<string, any>forremote_data.The
remote_dataproperty uses a flexible type, which is suitable for storing additional data. Ensure that this flexibility is handled appropriately in the application logic.
110-119: Date string validation.The properties
remote_created_at,created_at, andmodified_atuse@IsDateString()for validation, ensuring they are valid date strings.
139-146: Boolean validation forremote_was_deleted.The
remote_was_deletedproperty uses@IsBoolean()for validation, which is appropriate for a boolean value.packages/api/src/hris/employerbenefit/types/model.unified.ts (2)
10-63: LGTM!The
UnifiedHrisEmployerbenefitInputclass is well-structured with appropriate use of decorators for validation and API documentation.
65-142: LGTM!The
UnifiedHrisEmployerbenefitOutputclass extends the input class correctly and uses decorators appropriately for the additional fields.packages/api/src/accounting/incomestatement/types/model.unified.ts (2)
10-93: LGTM!The
UnifiedAccountingIncomestatementInputclass is well-structured with appropriate use of decorators for validation and API documentation.
95-150: LGTM!The
UnifiedAccountingIncomestatementOutputclass extends the input class correctly and uses decorators appropriately for the additional fields.packages/api/src/accounting/vendorcredit/types/model.unified.ts (2)
11-103: LGTM!The
UnifiedAccountingVendorcreditInputclass is well-structured with appropriate use of decorators for validation and API documentation.
105-154: LGTM!The
UnifiedAccountingVendorcreditOutputclass extends the input class correctly and uses decorators appropriately for the additional fields. The non-optional fields are correctly handled.packages/api/src/accounting/item/types/model.unified.ts (14)
11-19: Ensure consistent use of validation decorators.The
nameproperty is correctly annotated with@IsStringand@IsOptional. All properties should consistently use these decorators to ensure proper validation.
21-29: Ensure consistent documentation and validation.The
statusproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure similar consistency across all properties.
31-39: Check numerical property validation.The
unit_priceproperty uses@IsNumber, which is appropriate. Ensure that the example value is representative of the expected input.
41-49: Validate numerical properties consistently.The
purchase_priceproperty follows the same pattern asunit_price. Ensure that all numerical properties use@IsNumberconsistently.
51-59: Verify UUID validation.The
sales_accountproperty uses@IsUUID, which is correct for UUID validation. Ensure that UUID properties are consistently validated.
61-69: Check UUID validation consistency.The
purchase_accountproperty is correctly validated as a UUID. Consistency across UUID properties is maintained.
71-79: Ensure UUID validation.The
id_acc_company_infoproperty is validated as a UUID, maintaining consistency with other UUID properties.
81-92: Review custom field mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty is optional and uses a flexible type. Ensure that its usage aligns with the intended functionality.
95-104: Check UUID validation for output properties.The
idproperty is validated as a UUID, which is consistent with its purpose.
106-114: Ensure remote ID validation.The
remote_idproperty is correctly validated as a string. Ensure that the example value is representative of the expected input.
116-124: Validate date strings.The
remote_updated_atproperty uses@IsDateString, which is appropriate for date validation. Ensure consistency across all date properties.
126-137: Review remote data property.The
remote_dataproperty is optional and uses a flexible type. Ensure that its usage aligns with the intended functionality.
139-147: Check date string validation.The
created_atproperty is validated as a date string, maintaining consistency with other date properties.
149-157: Ensure consistency in date validation.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString, consistent with the other date properties.packages/api/src/hris/payrollrun/types/model.unified.ts (14)
11-19: Ensure consistent use of validation decorators.The
run_stateproperty is correctly annotated with@IsStringand@IsOptional. All properties should consistently use these decorators to ensure proper validation.
21-29: Ensure consistent documentation and validation.The
run_typeproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure similar consistency across all properties.
31-39: Validate date strings consistently.The
start_dateproperty uses@IsDateString, which is appropriate for date validation. Ensure consistency across all date properties.
41-49: Check date string validation.The
end_dateproperty is validated as a date string, maintaining consistency with other date properties.
51-59: Ensure consistency in date validation.The
check_dateproperty uses@IsDateString, consistent with the other date properties.
61-72: Review custom field mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty is optional and uses a flexible type. Ensure that its usage aligns with the intended functionality.
75-84: Check UUID validation for output properties.The
idproperty is validated as a UUID, which is consistent with its purpose.
86-95: Ensure remote ID validation.The
remote_idproperty is correctly validated as a string. Ensure that the example value is representative of the expected input.
97-109: Review remote data property.The
remote_dataproperty is optional and uses a flexible type. Ensure that its usage aligns with the intended functionality.
111-120: Validate date strings for remote creation.The
remote_created_atproperty uses@IsDateString, which is appropriate for date validation. Ensure consistency across all date properties.
122-130: Check date string validation.The
created_atproperty is validated as a date string, maintaining consistency with other date properties.
132-140: Ensure consistency in date validation.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString, consistent with the other date properties.
142-151: Verify boolean property validation.The
remote_was_deletedproperty uses@IsBoolean, which is appropriate for boolean validation.
153-161: Check array of UUIDs validation.The
employee_payroll_runsproperty is optional and should be validated to ensure it contains valid UUIDs.packages/api/src/accounting/contact/types/model.unified.ts (15)
12-20: Ensure consistent use of validation decorators.The
nameproperty is correctly annotated with@IsStringand@IsOptional. All properties should consistently use these decorators to ensure proper validation.
22-30: Verify boolean property validation.The
is_supplierproperty uses@IsBoolean, which is appropriate for boolean validation.
32-40: Check boolean validation consistency.The
is_customerproperty is validated as a boolean, maintaining consistency with other boolean properties.
42-50: Ensure email validation.The
email_addressproperty uses@IsEmail, which is appropriate for email validation. Ensure that the example value is representative of the expected input.
52-60: Validate string properties consistently.The
tax_numberproperty is correctly validated as a string. Ensure similar consistency across all string properties.
62-70: Ensure consistent documentation and validation.The
statusproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure similar consistency across all properties.
72-80: Check string validation for currency.The
currencyproperty is correctly validated as a string. Ensure that the example value is representative of the expected input.
82-91: Validate date strings consistently.The
remote_updated_atproperty uses@IsDateString, which is appropriate for date validation. Ensure consistency across all date properties.
93-101: Verify UUID validation.The
company_info_idproperty uses@IsUUID, which is correct for UUID validation. Ensure that UUID properties are consistently validated.
103-114: Review custom field mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty is optional and uses a flexible type. Ensure that its usage aligns with the intended functionality.
117-126: Check UUID validation for output properties.The
idproperty is validated as a UUID, which is consistent with its purpose.
128-136: Ensure remote ID validation.The
remote_idproperty is correctly validated as a string. Ensure that the example value is representative of the expected input.
138-150: Review remote data property.The
remote_dataproperty is optional and uses a flexible type. Ensure that its usage aligns with the intended functionality.
152-160: Check date string validation.The
created_atproperty is validated as a date string, maintaining consistency with other date properties.
162-170: Ensure consistency in date validation.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString, consistent with the other date properties.packages/api/src/hris/benefit/types/model.unified.ts (2)
10-93: Ensure comprehensive validation and documentation forUnifiedHrisBenefitInput.The
UnifiedHrisBenefitInputclass is well-structured with optional properties, each having appropriate validation and API documentation. Ensure that the nullable properties align with the business logic and requirements.
95-169: Review the extension and additional properties inUnifiedHrisBenefitOutput.The
UnifiedHrisBenefitOutputclass extendsUnifiedHrisBenefitInputand adds more properties. This is a good approach for reusability and extending functionality. Ensure that the additional properties are necessary and correctly documented.packages/api/src/accounting/cashflowstatement/types/model.unified.ts (2)
11-107: Ensure comprehensive validation and documentation forUnifiedAccountingCashflowstatementInput.The
UnifiedAccountingCashflowstatementInputclass is well-structured with optional properties, each having appropriate validation and API documentation. Ensure that the nullable properties align with the business logic and requirements.
109-163: Review the extension and additional properties inUnifiedAccountingCashflowstatementOutput.The
UnifiedAccountingCashflowstatementOutputclass extendsUnifiedAccountingCashflowstatementInputand adds more properties. This is a good approach for reusability and extending functionality. Ensure that the additional properties are necessary and correctly documented.packages/api/src/accounting/address/types/model.unified.ts (2)
4-118: Ensure comprehensive validation and documentation forUnifiedAccountingAddressInput.The
UnifiedAccountingAddressInputclass is well-structured with optional properties, each having appropriate validation and API documentation. Ensure that the nullable properties align with the business logic and requirements.
120-173: Review the extension and additional properties inUnifiedAccountingAddressOutput.The
UnifiedAccountingAddressOutputclass extendsUnifiedAccountingAddressInputand adds more properties. This is a good approach for reusability and extending functionality. Ensure that the additional properties are necessary and correctly documented.packages/api/src/accounting/account/types/model.unified.ts (2)
10-123: LGTM!The properties in
UnifiedAccountingAccountInputare well-documented and validated. The use of@ApiPropertyOptionalandclass-validatordecorators is appropriate and enhances the robustness of the class.
125-179: LGTM!The properties in
UnifiedAccountingAccountOutputare consistent with those in the input class. The use of@ApiPropertyOptionalandclass-validatordecorators is appropriate and enhances the robustness of the class.packages/api/src/accounting/transaction/types/model.unified.ts (2)
11-123: LGTM!The properties in
UnifiedAccountingTransactionInputare well-documented and validated. The use of@ApiPropertyOptionalandclass-validatordecorators is appropriate and enhances the robustness of the class.
125-173: LGTM!The properties in
UnifiedAccountingTransactionOutputare consistent with those in the input class. The use of@ApiPropertyOptionalandclass-validatordecorators is appropriate and enhances the robustness of the class.packages/api/src/accounting/balancesheet/types/model.unified.ts (2)
12-119: LGTM!The properties in
UnifiedAccountingBalancesheetInputare well-documented and validated. The use of@ApiPropertyOptionalandclass-validatordecorators is appropriate and enhances the robustness of the class.
121-176: LGTM!The properties in
UnifiedAccountingBalancesheetOutputare consistent with those in the input class. The use of@ApiPropertyOptionalandclass-validatordecorators is appropriate and enhances the robustness of the class.packages/api/src/accounting/companyinfo/types/model.unified.ts (2)
14-113: Ensure Consistent Use of Decorators and Types.The
UnifiedAccountingCompanyinfoInputclass is well-structured with appropriate use of decorators for validation and API documentation. Ensure that the examples provided in@ApiPropertyOptionalmatch the expected data types and are consistent with the descriptions. Consider adding more detailed examples for complex fields likefield_mappings.
115-181: Verify Extensibility and Data Integrity.The
UnifiedAccountingCompanyinfoOutputclass extendsUnifiedAccountingCompanyinfoInputand adds additional properties. Ensure that the UUID and date string properties are correctly validated and documented. The use of@IsUUIDand@IsDateStringdecorators is appropriate here. Consider if additional constraints or examples are needed forremote_datato ensure data integrity.packages/api/src/hris/location/types/model.unified.ts (2)
10-113: Ensure Consistent Use of Decorators and Types.The
UnifiedHrisLocationInputclass is well-structured with appropriate use of decorators for validation and API documentation. Ensure that the examples provided in@ApiPropertyOptionalmatch the expected data types and are consistent with the descriptions. Consider adding more detailed examples for complex fields likefield_mappings.
115-191: Verify Extensibility and Data Integrity.The
UnifiedHrisLocationOutputclass extendsUnifiedHrisLocationInputand adds additional properties. Ensure that the UUID, date string, and boolean properties are correctly validated and documented. The use of@IsUUID,@IsDateString, and@IsBooleandecorators is appropriate here. Consider if additional constraints or examples are needed forremote_datato ensure data integrity.packages/api/src/hris/timeoff/types/model.unified.ts (2)
11-114: Ensure Consistent Use of Decorators and Types.The
UnifiedHrisTimeoffInputclass is well-structured with appropriate use of decorators for validation and API documentation. Ensure that the examples provided in@ApiPropertyOptionalmatch the expected data types and are consistent with the descriptions. Consider adding more detailed examples for complex fields likefield_mappings.
116-192: Verify Extensibility and Data Integrity.The
UnifiedHrisTimeoffOutputclass extendsUnifiedHrisTimeoffInputand adds additional properties. Ensure that the UUID, date string, and boolean properties are correctly validated and documented. The use of@IsUUID,@IsDateString, and@IsBooleandecorators is appropriate here. Consider if additional constraints or examples are needed forremote_datato ensure data integrity.packages/api/src/hris/employment/types/model.unified.ts (15)
12-20: Ensure Consistent Use of Validation Decorators.The
job_titleproperty correctly uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(). Ensure similar consistency across all properties.
62-70: FLSA Status Documentation.The
flsa_statusproperty is well-documented. Ensure that any specific statuses are either validated or documented as options.
72-80: Date String Validation.The
effective_dateproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
92-100: UUID Validation.The
pay_group_idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
102-110: Employee ID Validation.The
employee_idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
112-123: Custom Field Mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty uses@IsOptional(). Ensure that the structure of the object is well-documented if specific keys are expected.
127-135: UUID Validation for ID.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
137-146: Remote ID Documentation.The
remote_idproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(). Ensure that the remote ID format is consistent with the third-party system.
148-160: Remote Data Structure.The
remote_dataproperty uses@IsOptional(). Ensure that the structure of the object is well-documented if specific keys are expected.
162-171: Date String Validation for Remote Creation Date.The
remote_created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
173-181: Date String Validation for Created Date.The
created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
183-191: Date String Validation for Modified Date.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
193-201: Boolean Validation for Remote Deletion Status.The
remote_was_deletedproperty uses@IsBoolean()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for boolean values.
82-90: Employment Type Options.The
employment_typeproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(). If there are specific types, consider documenting or validating them.
32-40: Clarify Pay Period and Frequency.The
pay_periodandpay_frequencyproperties use@IsString()and@IsOptional(). Ensure that the allowed values are documented or validated if there are specific options.Verification successful
No Specific Allowed Values or Enums Found for
pay_periodandpay_frequency.The properties
pay_periodandpay_frequencyare defined as optional strings without specific allowed values or enums in the codebase. Consider documenting the expected values or implementing validation logic if there are specific constraints.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `pay_period` and `pay_frequency` have specific allowed values or enums. # Test: Search for enums or validation logic. Expect: Definitions or logic for allowed values. rg --type typescript 'pay_period|pay_frequency'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `pay_period` and `pay_frequency` have specific allowed values or enums. # Test: Search for enums or validation logic. Expect: Definitions or logic for allowed values. rg --type ts 'pay_period|pay_frequency'Length of output: 202
packages/api/src/accounting/expense/types/model.unified.ts (13)
12-21: Date String Validation for Transaction Date.The
transaction_dateproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
73-81: Memo Documentation.The
memoproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for descriptive notes.
83-91: UUID Validation for Account ID.The
account_idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
93-101: UUID Validation for Contact ID.The
contact_idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
103-111: UUID Validation for Company Info ID.The
company_info_idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
113-122: Tracking Categories Validation.The
tracking_categoriesproperty uses@IsArray(),@IsString({ each: true }), and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for an array of strings.
124-135: Custom Field Mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty uses@IsOptional(). Ensure that the structure of the object is well-documented if specific keys are expected.
138-147: UUID Validation for ID.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
149-157: Remote ID Documentation.The
remote_idproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(). Ensure that the remote ID format is consistent with the third-party system.
159-171: Remote Data Structure.The
remote_dataproperty uses@IsOptional(). Ensure that the structure of the object is well-documented if specific keys are expected.
173-181: Date String Validation for Remote Creation Date.The
remote_created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
183-191: Date String Validation for Created Date.The
created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
193-201: Date String Validation for Modified Date.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.packages/api/src/accounting/payment/types/model.unified.ts (15)
12-20: UUID Validation for Invoice ID.The
id_acc_invoiceproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
22-30: Date String Validation for Transaction Date.The
transaction_dateproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
32-40: UUID Validation for Contact ID.The
id_acc_contactproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
42-50: UUID Validation for Account ID.The
id_acc_accountproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
82-90: Payment Type Documentation.The
typeproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for categorizing payments.
92-100: UUID Validation for Company Info ID.The
id_acc_company_infoproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
102-110: UUID Validation for Accounting Period ID.The
id_acc_accounting_periodproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
112-121: Tracking Categories Validation.The
tracking_categoriesproperty uses@IsArray(),@IsString({ each: true }), and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for an array of strings.
123-134: Custom Field Mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty uses@IsOptional(). Ensure that the structure of the object is well-documented if specific keys are expected.
137-146: UUID Validation for ID.The
idproperty uses@IsUUID()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for UUIDs.
148-156: Remote ID Documentation.The
remote_idproperty uses@IsString()and@IsOptional(). Ensure that the remote ID format is consistent with the third-party system.
158-167: Date String Validation for Remote Update Date.The
remote_updated_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
169-181: Remote Data Structure.The
remote_dataproperty uses@IsOptional(). Ensure that the structure of the object is well-documented if specific keys are expected.
183-191: Date String Validation for Created Date.The
created_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.
193-201: Date String Validation for Modified Date.The
modified_atproperty uses@IsDateString()and@IsOptional(), which is appropriate for date strings.packages/api/src/hris/dependent/types/model.unified.ts (19)
11-19: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
first_nameproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
21-29: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
last_nameproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
31-39: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
middle_nameproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
41-49: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
relationshipproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
51-59: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
date_of_birthproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
61-69: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
genderproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
71-79: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
phone_numberproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
81-89: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
home_locationproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
91-99: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
is_studentproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
101-109: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
ssnproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
111-119: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
employee_idproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
121-132: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
field_mappingsproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
136-144: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
idproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
146-155: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_idproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
157-169: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_dataproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
171-180: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_created_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
182-190: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
created_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
192-200: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
modified_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
202-210: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_was_deletedproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.packages/api/src/accounting/journalentry/types/model.unified.ts (18)
11-19: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
transaction_dateproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
21-30: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
paymentsproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
32-41: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
applied_paymentsproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
43-51: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
memoproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
53-61: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
currencyproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
63-71: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
exchange_rateproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
73-80: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
id_acc_company_infoproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
82-90: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
journal_numberproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
92-101: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
tracking_categoriesproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
103-111: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
id_acc_accounting_periodproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
113-121: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
posting_statusproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
123-134: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
field_mappingsproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
138-146: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
idproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
148-156: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_idproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
158-167: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_created_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
180-192: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_dataproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
194-202: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
created_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
204-212: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
modified_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.packages/api/src/accounting/creditnote/types/model.unified.ts (21)
12-20: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
transaction_dateproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
22-30: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
statusproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
32-40: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
numberproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
42-50: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
contact_idproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
52-60: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
company_idproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
62-70: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
exchange_rateproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
72-80: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
total_amountproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
82-90: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remaining_creditproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
92-101: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
tracking_categoriesproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
103-111: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
currencyproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
113-122: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
paymentsproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
124-133: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
applied_paymentsproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
135-143: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
accounting_period_idproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
145-156: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
field_mappingsproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
160-168: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
idproperty usesIsUUIDfor validation, which is appropriate for UUIDs. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
170-179: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_idproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
181-193: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_dataproperty is well-documented and validated. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
195-204: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_created_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
206-215: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
remote_updated_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
217-225: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
created_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.
227-235: Ensure consistency in validation and documentation.The
modified_atproperty usesIsDateStringfor validation, which is appropriate for date strings. Ensure that similar properties maintain consistency in their documentation and validation.packages/api/src/accounting/purchaseorder/types/model.unified.ts (2)
11-165: Ensure Consistent Use of Data Types and Decorators.The class
UnifiedAccountingPurchaseorderInputis well-structured with appropriate use of decorators fromclass-validatorand@nestjs/swagger. All properties are optional and have relevant validation.
- Consider adding stricter validation where applicable, such as
@IsPositive()fortotal_amountif it should always be positive.- Ensure that the types and examples in
ApiPropertyOptionalmatch the expected input format.Overall, the changes enhance the data model effectively.
167-244: Review Inheritance and Additional Properties.The
UnifiedAccountingPurchaseorderOutputclass correctly extendsUnifiedAccountingPurchaseorderInput, inheriting its properties and adding output-specific fields.
- Ensure that the
remote_datafield's type is consistent with expected usage, as it's currently a genericRecord<string, any>.- Consider if additional validation is needed for fields like
remote_created_atandremote_updated_atto ensure valid date strings.The structure is consistent and well-documented.
packages/api/src/accounting/invoice/types/model.unified.ts (2)
11-195: Ensure Accurate Validation and Documentation.The
UnifiedAccountingInvoiceInputclass is well-structured with appropriate decorators.
- Consider using
@IsPositive()for numeric fields liketotal_discount,sub_total, andtotal_amountif they should always be positive.- Ensure that the
ApiPropertyOptionalexamples accurately reflect the expected input format.The class effectively enhances the invoice data model.
197-262: Verify Output-Specific Properties.The
UnifiedAccountingInvoiceOutputclass extendsUnifiedAccountingInvoiceInputand includes additional fields.
- Ensure that the
remote_datafield's type aligns with its intended use, as it is currently a genericRecord<string, any>.- Consider adding validation for date fields like
remote_updated_atto ensure valid date strings.The class is well-structured and follows best practices.
packages/api/src/hris/employeepayrollrun/types/model.unified.ts (5)
12-42: Review DeductionItem Properties.The
DeductionItemclass is well-defined with properties for payroll deductions.
- Consider using
@IsPositive()foremployee_deductionandcompany_deductionif they should always be positive amounts.The class is structured effectively for its purpose.
44-64: Ensure Proper Validation for EarningItem.The
EarningItemclass is well-structured with properties for payroll earnings.
- Consider using
@IsPositive()for theamountproperty if it should always be positive.The class is effectively organized for its intended use.
66-96: Review TaxItem Properties.The
TaxItemclass is well-defined with properties for payroll taxes.
- Consider using
@IsPositive()for theamountproperty if it should always be positive.The class is structured effectively for its purpose.
98-208: Ensure Comprehensive Validation for Payroll Input.The
UnifiedHrisEmployeepayrollrunInputclass is well-structured with detailed properties.
- Consider using
@IsPositive()for properties likegross_payandnet_payif they should always be positive.- Ensure that all date fields are correctly validated as date strings.
The class effectively captures payroll run input data.
210-286: Verify Output-Specific Properties for Payroll Output.The
UnifiedHrisEmployeepayrollrunOutputclass extendsUnifiedHrisEmployeepayrollrunInputand includes additional fields.
- Ensure that the
remote_datafield's type is consistent with its intended use, as it is currently a genericRecord<string, any>.- Consider adding validation for date fields like
remote_created_atto ensure valid date strings.The class is well-structured and adheres to best practices.
packages/api/src/hris/employee/types/model.unified.ts (29)
12-22: Ensure correct validation forgroups.The
groupsproperty is correctly annotated with@IsArray()and@IsString({ each: true }). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
24-32: Ensure correct validation foremployee_number.The
employee_numberproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
34-42: Ensure correct validation forcompany_id.The
company_idproperty is correctly annotated with@IsUUID(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
44-52: Ensure correct validation forfirst_name.The
first_nameproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
54-62: Ensure correct validation forlast_name.The
last_nameproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
64-72: Ensure correct validation forpreferred_name.The
preferred_nameproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
74-82: Ensure correct validation fordisplay_full_name.The
display_full_nameproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
84-92: Ensure correct validation forusername.The
usernameproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
94-102: Ensure correct validation forwork_email.The
work_emailproperty is correctly annotated with@IsEmail(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
104-112: Ensure correct validation forpersonal_email.The
personal_emailproperty is correctly annotated with@IsEmail(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
114-122: Ensure correct validation formobile_phone_number.The
mobile_phone_numberproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
124-133: Ensure correct validation foremployments.The
employmentsproperty is correctly annotated with@IsArray()and@IsString({ each: true }). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
145-153: Ensure correct validation forgender.The
genderproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
155-163: Ensure correct validation forethnicity.The
ethnicityproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
165-173: Ensure correct validation formarital_status.The
marital_statusproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
175-183: Ensure correct validation fordate_of_birth.The
date_of_birthproperty is correctly annotated with@IsDateString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
185-193: Ensure correct validation forstart_date.The
start_dateproperty is correctly annotated with@IsDateString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
195-203: Ensure correct validation foremployment_status.The
employment_statusproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
205-213: Ensure correct validation fortermination_date.The
termination_dateproperty is correctly annotated with@IsDateString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
215-223: Ensure correct validation foravatar_url.The
avatar_urlproperty is correctly annotated with@IsUrl(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
225-236: Ensure correct validation forfield_mappings.The
field_mappingsproperty is correctly annotated with@IsOptional(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
239-248: Ensure correct validation forid.The
idproperty is correctly annotated with@IsUUID(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
250-259: Ensure correct validation forremote_id.The
remote_idproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
261-273: Ensure correct handling ofremote_data.The
remote_dataproperty is correctly annotated with@IsOptional(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional and consider any security implications of handling remote data.
275-284: Ensure correct validation forremote_created_at.The
remote_created_atproperty is correctly annotated with@IsDateString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
286-294: Ensure correct validation forcreated_at.The
created_atproperty is correctly annotated with@IsDateString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
296-304: Ensure correct validation formodified_at.The
modified_atproperty is correctly annotated with@IsDateString(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
306-313: Ensure correct validation forremote_was_deleted.The
remote_was_deletedproperty is correctly annotated with@IsOptional(). Ensure that the API consumer is aware that this field is optional.
135-143: Handle sensitive information securely forssn.The
ssnproperty is correctly annotated with@IsString(), but it handles sensitive information. Ensure that this data is encrypted or masked when stored or transmitted.packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma (5)
19-20: Timezone-aware timestamps inusersmodel.The update to use
@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields ensures that timestamps are timezone-aware, enhancing the accuracy of time-related data.
34-37: Timezone-aware timestamps inwebhook_endpointsmodel.The
created_atandlast_updatefields now use@db.Timestamptz(6), ensuring timestamps are timezone-aware and consistent.
108-109: Timezone-aware timestamps inconnectionsmodel.The
expiration_timestampandcreated_atfields now use@db.Timestamptz(6), ensuring that timestamps are timezone-aware, which is important for global applications.
133-134: Timezone-aware timestamps incrm_addressesmodel.The
created_atandmodified_atfields now use@db.Timestamptz(6), providing consistency and accuracy in time-related data by including timezone information.
1772-2114: Addition of HRIS models with timezone-aware timestamps.The new HRIS models, such as
hris_bank_infos,hris_benefits, andhris_companies, enhance the schema's capabilities for managing HR-related data. The use of@db.Timestamptz(6)for timestamp fields ensures consistent and accurate time data handling.
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: Number, | ||
| example: 2000, | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: 'The total tax rate in basis points (e.g., 2000 for 20%)', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsNumber() | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| total_tax_ratge?: number; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct Typographical Error in Property Name.
The property total_tax_ratge contains a typographical error. It should be total_tax_rate.
- total_tax_ratge?: number;
+ total_tax_rate?: number;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | |
| type: Number, | |
| example: 2000, | |
| nullable: true, | |
| description: 'The total tax rate in basis points (e.g., 2000 for 20%)', | |
| }) | |
| @IsNumber() | |
| @IsOptional() | |
| total_tax_ratge?: number; | |
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | |
| type: Number, | |
| example: 2000, | |
| nullable: true, | |
| description: 'The total tax rate in basis points (e.g., 2000 for 20%)', | |
| }) | |
| @IsNumber() | |
| @IsOptional() | |
| total_tax_rate?: number; |
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: Object, | ||
| example: { | ||
| raw_data: { | ||
| additional_field: 'some value', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: | ||
| 'The remote data of the attachment in the context of the 3rd Party', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| remote_data?: Record<string, any>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider specifying the structure of remote_data.
The remote_data property is a Record<string, any>. If possible, specify a more detailed structure to improve type safety and documentation.
- remote_data?: Record<string, any>;
+ remote_data?: Record<string, string | number | boolean>;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: Object, | ||
| example: { | ||
| custom_field_1: 'value1', | ||
| custom_field_2: 'value2', | ||
| }, | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: | ||
| 'The custom field mappings of the object between the remote 3rd party & Panora', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| field_mappings?: Record<string, any>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider specifying the structure of field_mappings.
The field_mappings property is a Record<string, any>. If possible, specify a more detailed structure to improve type safety and documentation.
- field_mappings?: Record<string, any>;
+ field_mappings?: Record<string, string | number | boolean>;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | |
| type: Object, | |
| example: { | |
| custom_field_1: 'value1', | |
| custom_field_2: 'value2', | |
| }, | |
| nullable: true, | |
| description: | |
| 'The custom field mappings of the object between the remote 3rd party & Panora', | |
| }) | |
| @IsOptional() | |
| field_mappings?: Record<string, any>; | |
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | |
| type: Object, | |
| example: { | |
| custom_field_1: 'value1', | |
| custom_field_2: 'value2', | |
| }, | |
| nullable: true, | |
| description: | |
| 'The custom field mappings of the object between the remote 3rd party & Panora', | |
| }) | |
| @IsOptional() | |
| field_mappings?: Record<string, string | number | boolean>; |
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: Object, | ||
| example: { | ||
| raw_data: { | ||
| additional_field: 'some value', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: | ||
| 'The remote data of the pay group in the context of the 3rd Party', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| remote_data?: Record<string, any>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider specifying the structure of remote_data.
The remote_data property is a Record<string, any>. If possible, specify a more detailed structure to improve type safety and documentation.
- remote_data?: Record<string, any>;
+ remote_data?: Record<string, string | number | boolean>;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | |
| type: Object, | |
| example: { | |
| raw_data: { | |
| additional_field: 'some value', | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| nullable: true, | |
| description: | |
| 'The remote data of the pay group in the context of the 3rd Party', | |
| }) | |
| @IsOptional() | |
| remote_data?: Record<string, any>; | |
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | |
| type: Object, | |
| example: { | |
| raw_data: { | |
| additional_field: 'some value', | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| nullable: true, | |
| description: | |
| 'The remote data of the pay group in the context of the 3rd Party', | |
| }) | |
| @IsOptional() | |
| remote_data?: Record<string, string | number | boolean>; |
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: Object, | ||
| example: { | ||
| custom_field_1: 'value1', | ||
| custom_field_2: 'value2', | ||
| }, | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: | ||
| 'The custom field mappings of the object between the remote 3rd party & Panora', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| field_mappings?: Record<string, any>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider specifying the structure of field_mappings.
The field_mappings property is a Record<string, any>. If possible, specify a more detailed structure to improve type safety and documentation.
- field_mappings?: Record<string, any>;
+ field_mappings?: Record<string, string | number | boolean>;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | |
| type: Object, | |
| example: { | |
| custom_field_1: 'value1', | |
| custom_field_2: 'value2', | |
| }, | |
| nullable: true, | |
| description: | |
| 'The custom field mappings of the object between the remote 3rd party & Panora', | |
| }) | |
| @IsOptional() | |
| field_mappings?: Record<string, any>; | |
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | |
| type: Object, | |
| example: { | |
| custom_field_1: 'value1', | |
| custom_field_2: 'value2', | |
| }, | |
| nullable: true, | |
| description: | |
| 'The custom field mappings of the object between the remote 3rd party & Panora', | |
| }) | |
| @IsOptional() | |
| field_mappings?: Record<string, string | number | boolean>; |
| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: String, | ||
| example: 'USD', | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: 'The currency of the expense', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsString() | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| currency?: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Currency Validation.
The currency property uses @IsString() and @IsOptional(). Consider using a custom validator or enum for currency codes.
@IsString()
@IsOptional()
// Consider using an enum or custom validator for currency codes
currency?: string;| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: String, | ||
| example: '1.2', | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: 'The exchange rate applied to the expense', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsString() | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| exchange_rate?: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Exchange Rate Validation.
The exchange_rate property uses @IsString() and @IsOptional(). Ensure the format is consistent and consider using a numeric type if applicable.
@IsString()
@IsOptional()
// Consider using a numeric type if applicable
exchange_rate?: string;| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: String, | ||
| example: 'USD', | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: 'The currency of the payment', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsString() | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| currency?: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Currency Validation.
The currency property uses @IsString() and @IsOptional(). Consider using a custom validator or enum for currency codes.
@IsString()
@IsOptional()
// Consider using an enum or custom validator for currency codes
currency?: string;| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: String, | ||
| example: '1.2', | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: 'The exchange rate applied to the payment', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsString() | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| exchange_rate?: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Exchange Rate Validation.
The exchange_rate property uses @IsString() and @IsOptional(). Ensure the format is consistent and consider using a numeric type if applicable.
@IsString()
@IsOptional()
// Consider using a numeric type if applicable
exchange_rate?: string;| @ApiPropertyOptional({ | ||
| type: Number, | ||
| example: 10000, | ||
| nullable: true, | ||
| description: 'The total amount of the payment in cents', | ||
| }) | ||
| @IsNumber() | ||
| @IsOptional() | ||
| total_amount?: number; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validate Total Amount.
The total_amount property uses @IsNumber() and @IsOptional(), which is appropriate. Consider adding constraints like @Min() or @Max() if applicable.
@IsNumber()
@IsOptional()
// Add constraints if needed
// @Min(0)
total_amount?: number;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Outside diff range comments (4)
packages/api/src/hris/benefit/benefit.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
74-76:
Improve error handling ingetBenefits.The current error handling rethrows the error without additional context. Consider using a more descriptive error message or logging the error for better traceability.
catch (error) { this.logger.error('Error retrieving benefits', error); throw new Error('Failed to retrieve benefits'); }packages/api/src/hris/bankinfo/bankinfo.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
134-136:
Improve error handling inretrieve.Consider adding error logging or a more descriptive error message for better traceability and debugging.
catch (error) { this.logger.error('Error retrieving bank info', error); throw new Error('Failed to retrieve bank info'); }packages/api/src/hris/company/company.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
74-76:
Improve error handling ingetCompanies.Consider adding error logging or a more descriptive error message for better traceability and debugging.
catch (error) { this.logger.error('Error retrieving companies', error); throw new Error('Failed to retrieve companies'); }packages/api/src/ecommerce/order/services/order.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
99-173: Remove redundant catch clause inaddOrder.The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is unnecessary and can be removed to simplify the code.
} catch (error) { - throw error; }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/api/swagger/swagger-spec.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (18)
- packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma (38 hunks)
- packages/api/scripts/init.sql (42 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/sync/sync.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/accounting.module.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/ecommerce/order/services/order.service.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/bankinfo/bankinfo.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/bankinfo/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/benefit/benefit.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/benefit/benefit.module.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/benefit/sync/sync.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/benefit/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/company/company.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/company/company.module.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/company/services/gusto/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/company/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/dependent/dependent.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/dependent/dependent.module.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/dependent/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/api/src/hris/benefit/sync/sync.service.ts
[error] 68-68: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 92-92: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 172-172: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
Additional comments not posted (66)
packages/api/src/hris/company/types/index.ts (1)
8-11: Ensure compatibility with the newsyncmethod.The
syncmethod inICompanyServicehas replaced the previousaddCompanyandsyncCompanysmethods. Verify that all calls to these methods are updated to use the newsyncmethod with theSyncParamtype.Verification successful
The transition to the new
syncmethod is complete.The
syncmethod with theSyncParamtype is used consistently across the codebase, indicating that all previous calls toaddCompanyandsyncCompanyshave been updated correctly. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `sync` method in `ICompanyService` are updated correctly. # Test: Search for the `sync` method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'sync($_: SyncParam)'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `sync` method in `ICompanyService` are updated correctly. # Test: Search for the `sync` method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg 'sync\(\s*data:\s*SyncParam\s*\)' --glob '*.ts' -A 5Length of output: 93894
packages/api/src/hris/dependent/dependent.module.ts (1)
5-14: Review dependency changes inDependentModule.The
Utilsservice has been added, and several services have been removed from the providers list. Ensure that the removed services are not required elsewhere in the application and that theUtilsservice is correctly utilized.packages/api/src/hris/benefit/types/index.ts (1)
8-11: Ensure compatibility with the newsyncmethod.The
syncmethod inIBenefitServicehas replaced the previousaddBenefitandsyncBenefitsmethods. Verify that all calls to these methods are updated to use the newsyncmethod with theSyncParamtype.packages/api/src/hris/bankinfo/types/index.ts (1)
11-11: Verify the usage of the newsyncmethod signature.The
syncmethod now uses aSyncParamtype, which should simplify the interface. Ensure that all calls to this method have been updated to reflect this new signature.packages/api/src/hris/dependent/types/index.ts (1)
11-11: Verify the usage of the newsyncmethod signature.The
syncmethod now consolidates functionality into a single method usingSyncParam. Ensure that all calls to this method have been updated to reflect this new signature.packages/api/src/hris/company/company.module.ts (1)
9-24: Verify the integration of new services and the impact of removed services.The new services
GustoCompanyMapper,GustoService, andUtilshave been added, whileBullQueueModulehas been removed. Ensure that the new services are correctly integrated and that the removal does not affect the module's functionality.packages/api/src/hris/benefit/benefit.module.ts (2)
9-10: Addition of GustoService and GustoBenefitMapper.The inclusion of
GustoServiceandGustoBenefitMapperin the providers list suggests a new integration with Gusto for managing benefits. Ensure that these services are thoroughly tested and documented to prevent integration issues.
22-25: Removal of BullQueueModule.The removal of
BullQueueModulefrom the imports suggests a change in how background jobs are managed. Verify that any dependent functionality is either refactored or replaced appropriately.Verification successful
Removal of BullQueueModule Verified
The
BullQueueModulewas not used inbenefit.module.ts, so its removal does not impact the functionality of this module.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of BullQueueModule does not affect existing functionality. # Test: Search for any usage of BullQueueModule to ensure it has been refactored or replaced. rg --type ts 'BullQueueModule' -A 5Length of output: 66382
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to BullQueueModule within the benefit.module.ts file or related files. rg 'BullQueueModule' packages/api/src/hris/benefit/benefit.module.ts -A 5Length of output: 73
packages/api/src/hris/benefit/benefit.controller.ts (1)
60-60: Validation enhancement approved.The addition of
ValidationPipewithtransform: trueanddisableErrorMessages: trueis a good practice for data validation and security.packages/api/src/hris/bankinfo/bankinfo.controller.ts (1)
111-111: Validation enhancement approved.The addition of
ValidationPipewithtransform: trueanddisableErrorMessages: trueis a good practice for data validation and security.packages/api/src/hris/company/company.controller.ts (2)
52-52: Validation enhancement approved.The addition of
ValidationPipewithtransform: trueanddisableErrorMessages: trueis a good practice for data validation and security.
Line range hint
32-34:
Decorator changes approved.The shift from
@ApiBodyto@ApiHeaderaligns with best practices for header-based metadata and authentication.packages/api/src/hris/benefit/sync/sync.service.ts (2)
40-70: LGTM! NewkickstartSyncmethod enhances automated synchronization.The
kickstartSyncmethod is well-implemented, providing automated synchronization of benefits every 8 hours.Tools
Biome
[error] 68-68: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
72-91: LGTM! NewsyncForLinkedUsermethod is well-structured.The
syncForLinkedUsermethod encapsulates the logic for synchronizing data for a specific linked user effectively.packages/api/src/ecommerce/order/services/order.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
52-61: LGTM! Naming convention changes improve readability.The shift to camelCase naming style for
unifiedEcommerceOrderDataaligns with JavaScript conventions and enhances code readability.packages/api/src/@core/sync/sync.service.ts (2)
33-38: Switch-case update approved.The addition of
ConnectorCategory.HrisandConnectorCategory.Accountingcases in theinitialSyncmethod is correctly implemented. Ensure that the corresponding methods are thoroughly tested.
53-168:handleHrisSyncmethod implementation approved.The
handleHrisSyncmethod is well-structured with appropriate error handling and logging. Ensure that the order of task execution aligns with the business logic requirements.packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma (39)
19-20: Improved time zone handling forusersmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
34-37: Improved time zone handling forwebhook_endpointsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandlast_updatefields enhances the handling of time zone information.
108-109: Improved time zone handling forconnectionsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forexpiration_timestampandcreated_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
133-134: Improved time zone handling forcrm_addressesmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
148-149: Improved time zone handling forcrm_companiesmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
172-173: Improved time zone handling forcrm_contactsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
194-195: Improved time zone handling forcrm_dealsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
217-218: Improved time zone handling forcrm_deals_stagesmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
232-233: Improved time zone handling forcrm_email_addressesmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
251-261: Improved time zone handling forcrm_engagementsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forstart_at,end_time,created_at, andmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
272-273: Improved time zone handling forcrm_notesmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
298-299: Improved time zone handling forcrm_phone_numbersmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
315-318: Improved time zone handling forcrm_tasksmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)fordue_date,finished_date,created_at, andmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
339-340: Improved time zone handling forcrm_usersmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
391-391: Improved time zone handling foreventsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)for thetimestampfield enhances the handling of time zone information.
401-407: Newinvite_linksmodel added.This model provides a structure for managing invite links and their associated metadata.
415-415: Improved time zone handling forjobs_status_historymodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)for thetimestampfield enhances the handling of time zone information.
462-462: Improved time zone handling forremote_datamodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)for thecreated_atfield enhances the handling of time zone information.
472-473: Improved time zone handling fortcg_accountsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
487-488: Improved time zone handling fortcg_attachmentsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
509-510: Improved time zone handling fortcg_collectionsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
529-530: Improved time zone handling fortcg_commentsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
550-551: Improved time zone handling fortcg_contactsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
567-568: Improved time zone handling fortcg_tagsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
594-608: Improved time zone handling fortcg_ticketsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)fordue_date,completed_at,created_at, andmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
627-628: Improved time zone handling fortcg_usersmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
1056-1057: Improved time zone handling forfs_groupsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
1067-1068: Improved time zone handling forfs_usersmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1077-1078: Improved time zone handling foracc_accounting_periodsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1100-1101: Improved time zone handling foracc_accountsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
1113-1114: Improved time zone handling foracc_addressesmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1135-1136: Improved time zone handling foracc_attachmentsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1156-1157: Improved time zone handling foracc_balance_sheetsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1176-1177: Improved time zone handling foracc_balance_sheets_report_itemsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1194-1195: Improved time zone handling foracc_cash_flow_statement_report_itemsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1212-1213: Improved time zone handling foracc_cash_flow_statementsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1231-1232: Improved time zone handling foracc_company_infosmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
Line range hint
1265-1266: Improved time zone handling foracc_contactsmodel.The transition from
@db.Timestamp(6)to@db.Timestamptz(6)forcreated_atandmodified_atfields enhances the handling of time zone information.
1775-1791: Newhris_bank_infosmodel added.This model provides a structure for managing bank information related to HRIS, with proper time zone handling for timestamps.
packages/api/scripts/init.sql (10)
31-34: LGTM! Enhanced timestamp management.The change to use
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandlast_updateinwebhook_endpointstable is a good practice for applications dealing with multiple time zones.
52-53: LGTM! Consistent timestamp management.The change to use
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atinuserstable ensures consistency in handling timestamps across time zones.
78-79: LGTM! Improved timestamp management.Changing
created_atandmodified_attotimestamp with time zoneintcg_userstable is beneficial for applications handling multiple time zones.
111-112: LGTM! Consistent timestamp handling.The update to use
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atintcg_collectionstable ensures consistent time management across time zones.
126-127: LGTM! Enhanced time zone support.The change to use
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atintcg_accountstable is a good practice for applications dealing with multiple time zones.
165-185: LGTM! Comprehensive HRIS time off table.The new
hris_time_offtable is well-designed for managing employee time off requests, with appropriate use oftimestamp with time zonefor time-related fields.
189-205: LGTM! Robust HRIS payroll runs table.The new
hris_payroll_runstable is well-structured for managing payroll processes, with effective use oftimestamp with time zonefor time-related fields.
973-1015: LGTM! Comprehensive HRIS employees table.The new
hris_employeestable is detailed and covers extensive employee information, with consistent use oftimestamp with time zonefor time-related fields.
1727-1755: LGTM! Detailed HRIS employee payroll runs table.The new
hris_employee_payroll_runstable is well-designed for managing payroll details, with appropriate use oftimestamp with time zonefor time-related fields.
2435-2452: LGTM! Efficient HRIS payroll taxes table.The new
hris_employee_payroll_runs_taxestable is well-structured for managing payroll tax information, with effective use oftimestamp with time zonefor time-related fields.
| // todo | ||
| async handleAccountingSync(provider: string, linkedUserId: string) { | ||
| return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement handleAccountingSync method.
The handleAccountingSync method is currently not implemented. Ensure that this method is completed before merging.
Would you like assistance with implementing this method or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
| @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ export class DependentController { | |||
| }) | |||
| @ApiPaginatedResponse(UnifiedHrisDependentOutput) | |||
| @UseGuards(ApiKeyAuthGuard) | |||
| @UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true })) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider enabling error messages in ValidationPipe.
While the ValidationPipe enhances input validation, disabling error messages can make debugging more difficult. Consider enabling them during development.
- @UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true }))
+ @UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: false }))Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true })) | |
| @UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: false })) |
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant catch clause in saveToDb.
The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is unnecessary and can be removed to simplify the code.
} catch (error) {
- throw error;
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 172-172: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant catch clause in syncForLinkedUser.
The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is unnecessary and can be removed to simplify the code.
} catch (error) {
- throw error;
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 92-92: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant catch clause in kickstartSync.
The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is unnecessary and can be removed to simplify the code.
} catch (error) {
- throw error;
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 68-68: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import { TaxRateModule } from './taxrate/taxrate.module'; | |||
| import { TrackingCategoryModule } from './trackingcategory/trackingcategory.module'; | |||
| import { TransactionModule } from './transaction/transaction.module'; | |||
| import { VendorCreditModule } from './vendorcredit/vendorcredit.module'; | |||
| import { AccountingUnificationService } from './@lib/@unification'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Lack of Test Coverage for AccountingUnificationService
The AccountingUnificationService is implemented and added to the providers list, but there are no test cases found for this service. It is important to ensure that this service is properly tested to verify its integration and functionality within the existing modules. Consider adding unit tests or integration tests to cover the service's behavior and interactions.
- File:
packages/api/src/accounting/@lib/@unification/index.ts(Implementation) - File:
packages/api/src/accounting/accounting.module.ts(Integration)
Analysis chain
Addition of AccountingUnificationService.
The AccountingUnificationService has been added to the providers list, indicating a new service for accounting operations. Ensure that this service is properly implemented and integrated with existing modules.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and integration of AccountingUnificationService.
# Test: Check for the implementation of AccountingUnificationService.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class AccountingUnificationService { $$$ }'
# Test: Check for test cases related to AccountingUnificationService.
rg --type ts 'AccountingUnificationService' -A 5
Length of output: 1743
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for test files or test cases related to AccountingUnificationService.
# Find test files that might contain tests for AccountingUnificationService.
fd '.*\.(spec|test)\.ts' | xargs rg 'AccountingUnificationService'
Length of output: 528
| async desunify( | ||
| source: UnifiedHrisCompanyInput, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { slug: string; remote_id: string }[], | ||
| ): Promise<any> { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incomplete desunify method.
The desunify method is currently not implemented. Consider implementing this method or adding a TODO comment if it's planned for future development.
Would you like assistance in implementing the desunify method, or should a TODO comment be added to track this task?
| /*if (company.locations && company.locations.length > 0) { | ||
| const locations = await this.ingestService.ingestData< | ||
| UnifiedHrisLocationOutput, | ||
| GustoLocationOutput | ||
| >( | ||
| company.locations, | ||
| 'gusto', | ||
| connectionId, | ||
| 'hris', | ||
| HrisObject.location, | ||
| [], | ||
| ); | ||
| if (locations) { | ||
| opts.locations = locations; | ||
| } | ||
| }*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commented-out code in mapSingleCompanyToUnified.
There is commented-out code related to location ingestion. If this code is not needed, consider removing it to improve readability. If it's intended for future use, add a comment explaining its purpose.
- /*if (company.locations && company.locations.length > 0) {
- const locations = await this.ingestService.ingestData<
- UnifiedHrisLocationOutput,
- GustoLocationOutput
- >(
- company.locations,
- 'gusto',
- connectionId,
- 'hris',
- HrisObject.location,
- [],
- );
- if (locations) {
- opts.locations = locations;
- }
- }*/
+ // TODO: Implement location ingestion if needed in the future.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /*if (company.locations && company.locations.length > 0) { | |
| const locations = await this.ingestService.ingestData< | |
| UnifiedHrisLocationOutput, | |
| GustoLocationOutput | |
| >( | |
| company.locations, | |
| 'gusto', | |
| connectionId, | |
| 'hris', | |
| HrisObject.location, | |
| [], | |
| ); | |
| if (locations) { | |
| opts.locations = locations; | |
| } | |
| }*/ | |
| // TODO: Implement location ingestion if needed in the future. |
packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma
Outdated
| remote_id String? | ||
| remote_platform String? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider updating time zone handling for tcg_teams model.
The created_at and modified_at fields are using @db.Timestamp(6). Consider updating them to @db.Timestamptz(6) for consistency with other models.
- created_at DateTime @db.Timestamp(6)
- modified_at DateTime @db.Timestamp(6)
+ created_at DateTime @db.Timestamptz(6)
+ modified_at DateTime @db.Timestamptz(6)Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/api/swagger/swagger-spec.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (11)
- packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma (38 hunks)
- packages/api/scripts/init.sql (42 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/@core-services/request-retry/retry.handler.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/connections/hris/services/gusto/gusto.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/passthrough/passthrough.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/passthrough/passthrough.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/passthrough/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/sync/sync.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/company/services/company.service.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/company/services/gusto/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/hris/company/sync/sync.service.ts (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/api/src/hris/company/sync/sync.service.ts
[error] 69-69: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 86-86: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 171-171: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
packages/api/src/hris/company/services/company.service.ts
[error] 97-97: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 195-195: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
Additional comments not posted (24)
packages/api/src/@core/passthrough/types/index.ts (1)
9-10: LGTM! The changes improve response clarity.The modification to
PassthroughResponseenhances the clarity of the response structure by explicitly defining possible response types.packages/api/src/@core/passthrough/passthrough.service.ts (2)
33-33: LGTM! Default value forrequest_formatimproves robustness.Setting a default value for
request_formatensures that the service handles undefined formats gracefully.
78-78: LGTM! Explicit conversion ofstatusto a string ensures consistency.Converting
statusto a string prevents potential type mismatches, enhancing reliability.packages/api/src/@core/passthrough/passthrough.controller.ts (2)
65-65: LGTM! The changes improve project-specific data handling.The addition of
projectIdto method calls enhances the controller's ability to manage data in a project-specific context.
55-55: Ensure all calls togetConnectionMetadataFromConnectionTokenandgetLinkedUserDetailsincludeprojectId.The addition of
projectIdenhances functionality, but verify that all invocations of these methods are updated accordingly.packages/api/src/hris/company/services/gusto/mappers.ts (1)
34-55: LGTM!The
unifyfunction efficiently handles both single and multiple company inputs.packages/api/src/@core/@core-services/request-retry/retry.handler.ts (1)
20-26: LGTM!The changes to return a structured response object enhance clarity and usability.
packages/api/src/hris/company/sync/sync.service.ts (2)
Line range hint
18-33: LGTM!The constructor initializes dependencies and registers the service correctly.
Tools
Biome
[error] 69-69: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 86-86: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 171-171: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
36-38: LGTM!The
onModuleInitmethod is a placeholder for future initialization logic.packages/api/src/@core/connections/hris/services/gusto/gusto.service.ts (1)
68-70: Security enhancement with Bearer Authentication.The switch to Bearer Authentication is a positive change, aligning with modern security practices.
packages/api/src/@core/sync/sync.service.ts (2)
33-38: Update switch-case for new connector categories.The addition of
ConnectorCategory.HrisandConnectorCategory.Accountingensures that the new sync methods are invoked correctly.
48-50: ImplementhandleAccountingSyncmethod.The
handleAccountingSyncmethod is currently not implemented. Ensure that this method is completed before merging.packages/api/prisma/schema.prisma (2)
19-20: Approved: Consistent time zone handling.The update to use
@db.Timestamptz(6)for date-time fields is a good practice for handling time zones consistently across the application.Ensure that all models requiring time zone information have been updated.
Also applies to: 34-37, 108-109, 133-134, 148-149, 172-173, 194-195, 217-218, 232-233, 251-252, 260-261, 272-273, 298-299, 315-318, 339-340, 391-391, 415-415, 462-462, 472-473, 487-488, 509-510, 529-530, 550-551, 567-568, 594-599, 607-608, 627-628, 650-652, 683-685, 698-699, 706-709, 722-723, 738-739, 756-757, 1056-1057, 1067-1068, 1113-1113, 1481-1481
Verification successful
Consistent Time Zone Handling Verified
All instances of
@db.Timestamp(6)have been updated to@db.Timestamptz(6), ensuring consistent time zone handling across the Prisma schema. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all models have consistent time zone handling with `@db.Timestamptz(6)`. # Test: Search for any remaining `@db.Timestamp(6)` usage. Expect: No results. rg --type prisma '@db.Timestamp(6)'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all models have consistent time zone handling with `@db.Timestamptz(6)`. # Test: Search for any remaining `@db.Timestamp(6)` usage. Expect: No results. rg '@db.Timestamp(6)' --glob '*.prisma'Length of output: 41
1775-2120: Approved: New HRIS models.The introduction of new HRIS models expands the schema's capabilities for managing employee-related data. The models appear well-structured and consistent with existing schema design.
Verify the integration of these models with the rest of the application to ensure seamless functionality.
Verification successful
Integration Verified: HRIS Models
The new HRIS models are well-integrated into the codebase, as evidenced by their presence in SQL scripts and various service files. This indicates that they are actively used in database operations and business logic.
- SQL Scripts: References in
init.sqlfor creating tables and defining constraints.- Service Files: Extensive usage in TypeScript services for managing HRIS data.
These findings confirm that the models are properly integrated and utilized within the application.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of new HRIS models with existing models. # Test: Search for references to new HRIS models in the codebase. Expect: Proper integration and usage. rg --type prisma 'hris_'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify integration of new HRIS models with existing models. # Test: Search for references to new HRIS models in the codebase. Expect: Proper integration and usage. rg 'hris_'Length of output: 91162
packages/api/scripts/init.sql (10)
31-34: Good change: Timezone-aware timestamps.The use of
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandlast_updateinwebhook_endpointsensures correct time handling across different time zones.
52-53: Timezone-aware timestamps applied.The update to
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atinusersis a best practice for distributed applications.
78-79: Consistent timestamp management.The change to
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atintcg_usersimproves consistency in timestamp handling.
111-112: Improved timestamp consistency.The use of
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atintcg_collectionsensures consistent time data.
126-127: Consistent timezone handling.The update to
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atintcg_accountsaligns with best practices for time zone management.
141-141: Enhanced time accuracy with timezone.The change to
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atinremote_datahelps maintain accurate time data across regions.
158-159: Consistent time zone management.The update to
timestamp with time zoneforcreated_atandmodified_atinmanaged_webhooksis a good practice for consistent time management.
165-185: New tablehris_time_offadded.The
hris_time_offtable is well-designed for managing time off requests, with appropriate use oftimestamp with time zone.
189-205: New tablehris_payroll_runsadded.The
hris_payroll_runstable is structured to handle payroll data efficiently, with correct use oftimestamp with time zone.
974-1015: New tablehris_employeesadded.The
hris_employeestable is comprehensive for employee management, with appropriate use oftimestamp with time zone.
| type BaseResponse = { | ||
| status: number; | ||
| statusText: string; | ||
| headers: any; | ||
| data: any; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using specific types for headers and data.
While using any provides flexibility, specifying more precise types can enhance type safety and maintainability.
| ): Promise<{ | ||
| data: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput[]; | ||
| next_cursor: string | null; | ||
| previous_cursor: string | null; | ||
| }> { | ||
| try { | ||
| const companies = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findMany({ | ||
| take: limit + 1, | ||
| cursor: cursor ? { id_hris_company: cursor } : undefined, | ||
| where: { id_connection: connectionId }, | ||
| orderBy: { created_at: 'asc' }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const hasNextPage = companies.length > limit; | ||
| if (hasNextPage) companies.pop(); | ||
|
|
||
| const unifiedCompanies = await Promise.all( | ||
| companies.map(async (company) => { | ||
| const values = await this.prisma.value.findMany({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| entity: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | ||
| }, | ||
| include: { attribute: true }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const locations = await this.prisma.hris_locations.findMany({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id_hris_company: company.id_hris_company, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const field_mappings = Object.fromEntries( | ||
| values.map((value) => [value.attribute.slug, value.data]), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const unifiedCompany: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput = { | ||
| id: company.id_hris_company, | ||
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | ||
| display_name: company.display_name, | ||
| eins: company.eins, | ||
| field_mappings: field_mappings, | ||
| locations: locations.map((loc) => loc.id_hris_location), | ||
| remote_id: company.remote_id, | ||
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at, | ||
| created_at: company.created_at, | ||
| modified_at: company.modified_at, | ||
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| if (remote_data) { | ||
| const remoteDataRecord = await this.prisma.remote_data.findFirst({ | ||
| where: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | ||
| }); | ||
| unifiedCompany.remote_data = remoteDataRecord | ||
| ? JSON.parse(remoteDataRecord.data) | ||
| : null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return unifiedCompany; | ||
| }), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| await this.prisma.events.create({ | ||
| data: { | ||
| id_event: uuidv4(), | ||
| status: 'success', | ||
| type: 'hris.company.pull', | ||
| method: 'GET', | ||
| url: '/hris/companies', | ||
| provider: integrationId, | ||
| direction: '0', | ||
| timestamp: new Date(), | ||
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | ||
| id_project: projectId, | ||
| id_connection: connectionId, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| data: unifiedCompanies, | ||
| next_cursor: hasNextPage | ||
| ? companies[companies.length - 1].id_hris_company | ||
| : null, | ||
| previous_cursor: cursor ?? null, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize error handling in getCompanies.
Similar to getCompany, the catch clause here is also redundant and can be removed to simplify the code.
- try {
- ...
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }
+ ...Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ): Promise<{ | |
| data: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput[]; | |
| next_cursor: string | null; | |
| previous_cursor: string | null; | |
| }> { | |
| try { | |
| const companies = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findMany({ | |
| take: limit + 1, | |
| cursor: cursor ? { id_hris_company: cursor } : undefined, | |
| where: { id_connection: connectionId }, | |
| orderBy: { created_at: 'asc' }, | |
| }); | |
| const hasNextPage = companies.length > limit; | |
| if (hasNextPage) companies.pop(); | |
| const unifiedCompanies = await Promise.all( | |
| companies.map(async (company) => { | |
| const values = await this.prisma.value.findMany({ | |
| where: { | |
| entity: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | |
| }, | |
| include: { attribute: true }, | |
| }); | |
| const locations = await this.prisma.hris_locations.findMany({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_hris_company: company.id_hris_company, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const field_mappings = Object.fromEntries( | |
| values.map((value) => [value.attribute.slug, value.data]), | |
| ); | |
| const unifiedCompany: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput = { | |
| id: company.id_hris_company, | |
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | |
| display_name: company.display_name, | |
| eins: company.eins, | |
| field_mappings: field_mappings, | |
| locations: locations.map((loc) => loc.id_hris_location), | |
| remote_id: company.remote_id, | |
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at, | |
| created_at: company.created_at, | |
| modified_at: company.modified_at, | |
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted, | |
| }; | |
| if (remote_data) { | |
| const remoteDataRecord = await this.prisma.remote_data.findFirst({ | |
| where: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | |
| }); | |
| unifiedCompany.remote_data = remoteDataRecord | |
| ? JSON.parse(remoteDataRecord.data) | |
| : null; | |
| } | |
| return unifiedCompany; | |
| }), | |
| ); | |
| await this.prisma.events.create({ | |
| data: { | |
| id_event: uuidv4(), | |
| status: 'success', | |
| type: 'hris.company.pull', | |
| method: 'GET', | |
| url: '/hris/companies', | |
| provider: integrationId, | |
| direction: '0', | |
| timestamp: new Date(), | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| id_project: projectId, | |
| id_connection: connectionId, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return { | |
| data: unifiedCompanies, | |
| next_cursor: hasNextPage | |
| ? companies[companies.length - 1].id_hris_company | |
| : null, | |
| previous_cursor: cursor ?? null, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| ): Promise<{ | |
| data: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput[]; | |
| next_cursor: string | null; | |
| previous_cursor: string | null; | |
| }> { | |
| const companies = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findMany({ | |
| take: limit + 1, | |
| cursor: cursor ? { id_hris_company: cursor } : undefined, | |
| where: { id_connection: connectionId }, | |
| orderBy: { created_at: 'asc' }, | |
| }); | |
| const hasNextPage = companies.length > limit; | |
| if (hasNextPage) companies.pop(); | |
| const unifiedCompanies = await Promise.all( | |
| companies.map(async (company) => { | |
| const values = await this.prisma.value.findMany({ | |
| where: { | |
| entity: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | |
| }, | |
| include: { attribute: true }, | |
| }); | |
| const locations = await this.prisma.hris_locations.findMany({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_hris_company: company.id_hris_company, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const field_mappings = Object.fromEntries( | |
| values.map((value) => [value.attribute.slug, value.data]), | |
| ); | |
| const unifiedCompany: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput = { | |
| id: company.id_hris_company, | |
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | |
| display_name: company.display_name, | |
| eins: company.eins, | |
| field_mappings: field_mappings, | |
| locations: locations.map((loc) => loc.id_hris_location), | |
| remote_id: company.remote_id, | |
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at, | |
| created_at: company.created_at, | |
| modified_at: company.modified_at, | |
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted, | |
| }; | |
| if (remote_data) { | |
| const remoteDataRecord = await this.prisma.remote_data.findFirst({ | |
| where: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | |
| }); | |
| unifiedCompany.remote_data = remoteDataRecord | |
| ? JSON.parse(remoteDataRecord.data) | |
| : null; | |
| } | |
| return unifiedCompany; | |
| }), | |
| ); | |
| await this.prisma.events.create({ | |
| data: { | |
| id_event: uuidv4(), | |
| status: 'success', | |
| type: 'hris.company.pull', | |
| method: 'GET', | |
| url: '/hris/companies', | |
| provider: integrationId, | |
| direction: '0', | |
| timestamp: new Date(), | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| id_project: projectId, | |
| id_connection: connectionId, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return { | |
| data: unifiedCompanies, | |
| next_cursor: hasNextPage | |
| ? companies[companies.length - 1].id_hris_company | |
| : null, | |
| previous_cursor: cursor ?? null, | |
| }; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 195-195: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| id_hris_company: string, | ||
| linkedUserId: string, | ||
| integrationId: string, | ||
| connectionId: string, | ||
| projectId: string, | ||
| remote_data?: boolean, | ||
| ): Promise<UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput> { | ||
| return; | ||
| try { | ||
| const company = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findUnique({ | ||
| where: { id_hris_company: id_hris_company }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!company) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Company with ID ${id_hris_company} not found.`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const values = await this.prisma.value.findMany({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| entity: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | ||
| }, | ||
| include: { attribute: true }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const field_mappings = Object.fromEntries( | ||
| values.map((value) => [value.attribute.slug, value.data]), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const locations = await this.prisma.hris_locations.findMany({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id_hris_company: company.id_hris_company, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const unifiedCompany: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput = { | ||
| id: company.id_hris_company, | ||
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | ||
| display_name: company.display_name, | ||
| eins: company.eins, | ||
| field_mappings: field_mappings, | ||
| locations: locations.map((loc) => loc.id_hris_location), | ||
| remote_id: company.remote_id, | ||
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at, | ||
| created_at: company.created_at, | ||
| modified_at: company.modified_at, | ||
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| if (remote_data) { | ||
| const remoteDataRecord = await this.prisma.remote_data.findFirst({ | ||
| where: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | ||
| }); | ||
| unifiedCompany.remote_data = remoteDataRecord | ||
| ? JSON.parse(remoteDataRecord.data) | ||
| : null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| await this.prisma.events.create({ | ||
| data: { | ||
| id_event: uuidv4(), | ||
| status: 'success', | ||
| type: 'hris.company.pull', | ||
| method: 'GET', | ||
| url: '/hris/company', | ||
| provider: integrationId, | ||
| direction: '0', | ||
| timestamp: new Date(), | ||
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | ||
| id_project: projectId, | ||
| id_connection: connectionId, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return unifiedCompany; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize error handling in getCompany.
The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant. Removing it will simplify the code without affecting functionality.
- try {
- ...
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }
+ ...Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| id_hris_company: string, | |
| linkedUserId: string, | |
| integrationId: string, | |
| connectionId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| remote_data?: boolean, | |
| ): Promise<UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput> { | |
| return; | |
| try { | |
| const company = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findUnique({ | |
| where: { id_hris_company: id_hris_company }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!company) { | |
| throw new Error(`Company with ID ${id_hris_company} not found.`); | |
| } | |
| const values = await this.prisma.value.findMany({ | |
| where: { | |
| entity: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | |
| }, | |
| include: { attribute: true }, | |
| }); | |
| const field_mappings = Object.fromEntries( | |
| values.map((value) => [value.attribute.slug, value.data]), | |
| ); | |
| const locations = await this.prisma.hris_locations.findMany({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_hris_company: company.id_hris_company, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const unifiedCompany: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput = { | |
| id: company.id_hris_company, | |
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | |
| display_name: company.display_name, | |
| eins: company.eins, | |
| field_mappings: field_mappings, | |
| locations: locations.map((loc) => loc.id_hris_location), | |
| remote_id: company.remote_id, | |
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at, | |
| created_at: company.created_at, | |
| modified_at: company.modified_at, | |
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted, | |
| }; | |
| if (remote_data) { | |
| const remoteDataRecord = await this.prisma.remote_data.findFirst({ | |
| where: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | |
| }); | |
| unifiedCompany.remote_data = remoteDataRecord | |
| ? JSON.parse(remoteDataRecord.data) | |
| : null; | |
| } | |
| await this.prisma.events.create({ | |
| data: { | |
| id_event: uuidv4(), | |
| status: 'success', | |
| type: 'hris.company.pull', | |
| method: 'GET', | |
| url: '/hris/company', | |
| provider: integrationId, | |
| direction: '0', | |
| timestamp: new Date(), | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| id_project: projectId, | |
| id_connection: connectionId, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return unifiedCompany; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| id_hris_company: string, | |
| linkedUserId: string, | |
| integrationId: string, | |
| connectionId: string, | |
| projectId: string, | |
| remote_data?: boolean, | |
| ): Promise<UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput> { | |
| const company = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findUnique({ | |
| where: { id_hris_company: id_hris_company }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!company) { | |
| throw new Error(`Company with ID ${id_hris_company} not found.`); | |
| } | |
| const values = await this.prisma.value.findMany({ | |
| where: { | |
| entity: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | |
| }, | |
| include: { attribute: true }, | |
| }); | |
| const field_mappings = Object.fromEntries( | |
| values.map((value) => [value.attribute.slug, value.data]), | |
| ); | |
| const locations = await this.prisma.hris_locations.findMany({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_hris_company: company.id_hris_company, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const unifiedCompany: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput = { | |
| id: company.id_hris_company, | |
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | |
| display_name: company.display_name, | |
| eins: company.eins, | |
| field_mappings: field_mappings, | |
| locations: locations.map((loc) => loc.id_hris_location), | |
| remote_id: company.remote_id, | |
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at, | |
| created_at: company.created_at, | |
| modified_at: company.modified_at, | |
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted, | |
| }; | |
| if (remote_data) { | |
| const remoteDataRecord = await this.prisma.remote_data.findFirst({ | |
| where: { ressource_owner_id: company.id_hris_company }, | |
| }); | |
| unifiedCompany.remote_data = remoteDataRecord | |
| ? JSON.parse(remoteDataRecord.data) | |
| : null; | |
| } | |
| await this.prisma.events.create({ | |
| data: { | |
| id_event: uuidv4(), | |
| status: 'success', | |
| type: 'hris.company.pull', | |
| method: 'GET', | |
| url: '/hris/company', | |
| provider: integrationId, | |
| direction: '0', | |
| timestamp: new Date(), | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| id_project: projectId, | |
| id_connection: connectionId, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return unifiedCompany; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 97-97: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| async syncForLinkedUser(param: SyncLinkedUserType) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const { integrationId, linkedUserId } = param; | ||
| const service: ICompanyService = | ||
| this.serviceRegistry.getService(integrationId); | ||
| if (!service) return; | ||
|
|
||
| await this.ingestService.syncForLinkedUser< | ||
| UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput, | ||
| OriginalCompanyOutput, | ||
| ICompanyService | ||
| >(integrationId, linkedUserId, 'hris', 'company', service, []); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant catch clause.
The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is unnecessary.
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async syncForLinkedUser(param: SyncLinkedUserType) { | |
| try { | |
| const { integrationId, linkedUserId } = param; | |
| const service: ICompanyService = | |
| this.serviceRegistry.getService(integrationId); | |
| if (!service) return; | |
| await this.ingestService.syncForLinkedUser< | |
| UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput, | |
| OriginalCompanyOutput, | |
| ICompanyService | |
| >(integrationId, linkedUserId, 'hris', 'company', service, []); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| async syncForLinkedUser(param: SyncLinkedUserType) { | |
| try { | |
| const { integrationId, linkedUserId } = param; | |
| const service: ICompanyService = | |
| this.serviceRegistry.getService(integrationId); | |
| if (!service) return; | |
| await this.ingestService.syncForLinkedUser< | |
| UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput, | |
| OriginalCompanyOutput, | |
| ICompanyService | |
| >(integrationId, linkedUserId, 'hris', 'company', service, []); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 86-86: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| @@ -23,15 +23,22 @@ export class PassthroughService { | |||
| linkedUserId: string, | |||
| vertical: string, | |||
| connectionId: string, | |||
| projectId: string, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Update sendPassthroughRequest Calls to Include projectId
The sendPassthroughRequest method in passthrough.controller.ts does not include the projectId parameter, which is required by the updated method signature. Please update the method call to include this parameter.
- File:
packages/api/src/@core/passthrough/passthrough.controller.ts - Lines: Ensure
projectIdis passed when callingsendPassthroughRequest.
Analysis chain
Ensure all calls to sendPassthroughRequest include projectId.
The addition of projectId enhances functionality, but verify that all invocations of the method are updated accordingly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all calls to `sendPassthroughRequest` include `projectId`.
# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: All occurrences include `projectId`.
rg --type typescript -A 3 $'sendPassthroughRequest'
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all calls to `sendPassthroughRequest` include `projectId`.
# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: All occurrences include `projectId`.
rg --type ts -A 3 $'sendPassthroughRequest'
Length of output: 775
| const REDIRECT_URI = `${ | ||
| this.env.getPanoraBaseUrl() | ||
| }/connections/oauth/callback`; | ||
| const REDIRECT_URI = `${this.env.getPanoraBaseUrl()}/connections/oauth/callback`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize error handling in handleTokenRefresh.
The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant. Removing it will simplify the code without affecting functionality.
- try {
- ...
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }
+ ...Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @Cron('0 */8 * * *') // every 8 hours | ||
| async kickstartSync(user_id?: string) { | ||
| try { | ||
| this.logger.log('Syncing companies...'); | ||
| const users = user_id | ||
| ? [await this.prisma.users.findUnique({ where: { id_user: user_id } })] | ||
| : await this.prisma.users.findMany(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (users && users.length > 0) { | ||
| for (const user of users) { | ||
| const projects = await this.prisma.projects.findMany({ | ||
| where: { id_user: user.id_user }, | ||
| }); | ||
| for (const project of projects) { | ||
| const linkedUsers = await this.prisma.linked_users.findMany({ | ||
| where: { id_project: project.id_project }, | ||
| }); | ||
| for (const linkedUser of linkedUsers) { | ||
| for (const provider of HRIS_PROVIDERS) { | ||
| await this.syncForLinkedUser({ | ||
| integrationId: provider, | ||
| linkedUserId: linkedUser.id_linked_user, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant catch clause.
The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is unnecessary.
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Cron('0 */8 * * *') // every 8 hours | |
| async kickstartSync(user_id?: string) { | |
| try { | |
| this.logger.log('Syncing companies...'); | |
| const users = user_id | |
| ? [await this.prisma.users.findUnique({ where: { id_user: user_id } })] | |
| : await this.prisma.users.findMany(); | |
| if (users && users.length > 0) { | |
| for (const user of users) { | |
| const projects = await this.prisma.projects.findMany({ | |
| where: { id_user: user.id_user }, | |
| }); | |
| for (const project of projects) { | |
| const linkedUsers = await this.prisma.linked_users.findMany({ | |
| where: { id_project: project.id_project }, | |
| }); | |
| for (const linkedUser of linkedUsers) { | |
| for (const provider of HRIS_PROVIDERS) { | |
| await this.syncForLinkedUser({ | |
| integrationId: provider, | |
| linkedUserId: linkedUser.id_linked_user, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| @Cron('0 */8 * * *') // every 8 hours | |
| async kickstartSync(user_id?: string) { | |
| try { | |
| this.logger.log('Syncing companies...'); | |
| const users = user_id | |
| ? [await this.prisma.users.findUnique({ where: { id_user: user_id } })] | |
| : await this.prisma.users.findMany(); | |
| if (users && users.length > 0) { | |
| for (const user of users) { | |
| const projects = await this.prisma.projects.findMany({ | |
| where: { id_user: user.id_user }, | |
| }); | |
| for (const project of projects) { | |
| const linkedUsers = await this.prisma.linked_users.findMany({ | |
| where: { id_project: project.id_project }, | |
| }); | |
| for (const linkedUser of linkedUsers) { | |
| for (const provider of HRIS_PROVIDERS) { | |
| await this.syncForLinkedUser({ | |
| integrationId: provider, | |
| linkedUserId: linkedUser.id_linked_user, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 69-69: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| }), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const companiesEmployerBenefitsTasks = companies.map( | ||
| (company) => async () => | ||
| this.registry.getService('hris', 'employerbenefit').syncForLinkedUser({ | ||
| integrationId: provider, | ||
| linkedUserId: linkedUserId, | ||
| id_company: company.id_hris_company, | ||
| }), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const companiesGroupsTasks = companies.map( | ||
| (company) => async () => | ||
| this.registry.getService('hris', 'group').syncForLinkedUser({ | ||
| integrationId: provider, | ||
| linkedUserId: linkedUserId, | ||
| id_company: company.id_hris_company, | ||
| }), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const employees = await this.prisma.hris_employees.findMany({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id_connection: connection.id_connection, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const employeesBenefitsTasks = employees.map( | ||
| (employee) => async () => | ||
| this.registry.getService('hris', 'benefit').syncForLinkedUser({ | ||
| integrationId: provider, | ||
| linkedUserId: linkedUserId, | ||
| id_employee: employee.id_hris_employee, | ||
| }), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const employeesLocationsTasks = employees.map( | ||
| (employee) => async () => | ||
| this.registry.getService('hris', 'location').syncForLinkedUser({ | ||
| integrationId: provider, | ||
| linkedUserId: linkedUserId, | ||
| id_employee: employee.id_hris_employee, | ||
| }), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| for (const task of companiesEmployeeTasks) { | ||
| try { | ||
| await task(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.logger.error( | ||
| `Companies Employee task failed: ${error.message}`, | ||
| error, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for (const task of employeesLocationsTasks) { | ||
| try { | ||
| await task(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.logger.error( | ||
| `Companies Location task failed: ${error.message}`, | ||
| error, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for (const task of companiesEmployerBenefitsTasks) { | ||
| try { | ||
| await task(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.logger.error( | ||
| `Companies Employer Benefits task failed: ${error.message}`, | ||
| error, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for (const task of companiesGroupsTasks) { | ||
| try { | ||
| await task(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.logger.error( | ||
| `Companies Groups task failed: ${error.message}`, | ||
| error, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for (const task of employeesBenefitsTasks) { | ||
| try { | ||
| await task(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| this.logger.error( | ||
| `Employees Benefits task failed: ${error.message}`, | ||
| error, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement and refine handleHrisSync method.
The method is well-structured with tasks for different HRIS components. Consider defining the topological order for tasks as indicated by the TODO comments.
| async saveToDb( | ||
| connection_id: string, | ||
| linkedUserId: string, | ||
| data: any[], | ||
| companies: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput[], | ||
| originSource: string, | ||
| remote_data: Record<string, any>[], | ||
| ...rest: any | ||
| ): Promise<any[]> { | ||
| throw new Error('Method not implemented.'); | ||
| } | ||
| ): Promise<HrisCompany[]> { | ||
| try { | ||
| const companyResults: HrisCompany[] = []; | ||
|
|
||
| async onModuleInit() { | ||
| // Initialization logic | ||
| } | ||
| for (let i = 0; i < companies.length; i++) { | ||
| const company = companies[i]; | ||
| const originId = company.remote_id; | ||
|
|
||
| let existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findFirst({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| remote_id: originId, | ||
| id_connection: connection_id, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const companyData = { | ||
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | ||
| display_name: company.display_name, | ||
| eins: company.eins || [], | ||
| remote_id: originId, | ||
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at | ||
| ? new Date(company.remote_created_at) | ||
| : null, | ||
| modified_at: new Date(), | ||
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted || false, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| if (existingCompany) { | ||
| existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.update({ | ||
| where: { id_hris_company: existingCompany.id_hris_company }, | ||
| data: companyData, | ||
| }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.create({ | ||
| data: { | ||
| ...companyData, | ||
| id_hris_company: uuidv4(), | ||
| created_at: new Date(), | ||
| id_connection: connection_id, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Additional methods and logic | ||
| if (company.locations) { | ||
| for (const loc of company.locations) { | ||
| await this.prisma.hris_locations.update({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id_hris_location: loc, | ||
| }, | ||
| data: { | ||
| id_hris_company: existingCompany.id_hris_company, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| companyResults.push(existingCompany); | ||
|
|
||
| // Process field mappings | ||
| await this.ingestService.processFieldMappings( | ||
| company.field_mappings, | ||
| existingCompany.id_hris_company, | ||
| originSource, | ||
| linkedUserId, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Process remote data | ||
| await this.ingestService.processRemoteData( | ||
| existingCompany.id_hris_company, | ||
| remote_data[i], | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return companyResults; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant catch clause.
The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is unnecessary.
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async saveToDb( | |
| connection_id: string, | |
| linkedUserId: string, | |
| data: any[], | |
| companies: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput[], | |
| originSource: string, | |
| remote_data: Record<string, any>[], | |
| ...rest: any | |
| ): Promise<any[]> { | |
| throw new Error('Method not implemented.'); | |
| } | |
| ): Promise<HrisCompany[]> { | |
| try { | |
| const companyResults: HrisCompany[] = []; | |
| async onModuleInit() { | |
| // Initialization logic | |
| } | |
| for (let i = 0; i < companies.length; i++) { | |
| const company = companies[i]; | |
| const originId = company.remote_id; | |
| let existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| remote_id: originId, | |
| id_connection: connection_id, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const companyData = { | |
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | |
| display_name: company.display_name, | |
| eins: company.eins || [], | |
| remote_id: originId, | |
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at | |
| ? new Date(company.remote_created_at) | |
| : null, | |
| modified_at: new Date(), | |
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted || false, | |
| }; | |
| if (existingCompany) { | |
| existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.update({ | |
| where: { id_hris_company: existingCompany.id_hris_company }, | |
| data: companyData, | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.create({ | |
| data: { | |
| ...companyData, | |
| id_hris_company: uuidv4(), | |
| created_at: new Date(), | |
| id_connection: connection_id, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| // Additional methods and logic | |
| if (company.locations) { | |
| for (const loc of company.locations) { | |
| await this.prisma.hris_locations.update({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_hris_location: loc, | |
| }, | |
| data: { | |
| id_hris_company: existingCompany.id_hris_company, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| companyResults.push(existingCompany); | |
| // Process field mappings | |
| await this.ingestService.processFieldMappings( | |
| company.field_mappings, | |
| existingCompany.id_hris_company, | |
| originSource, | |
| linkedUserId, | |
| ); | |
| // Process remote data | |
| await this.ingestService.processRemoteData( | |
| existingCompany.id_hris_company, | |
| remote_data[i], | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| return companyResults; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| async saveToDb( | |
| connection_id: string, | |
| linkedUserId: string, | |
| companies: UnifiedHrisCompanyOutput[], | |
| originSource: string, | |
| remote_data: Record<string, any>[], | |
| ): Promise<HrisCompany[]> { | |
| try { | |
| const companyResults: HrisCompany[] = []; | |
| for (let i = 0; i < companies.length; i++) { | |
| const company = companies[i]; | |
| const originId = company.remote_id; | |
| let existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| remote_id: originId, | |
| id_connection: connection_id, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const companyData = { | |
| legal_name: company.legal_name, | |
| display_name: company.display_name, | |
| eins: company.eins || [], | |
| remote_id: originId, | |
| remote_created_at: company.remote_created_at | |
| ? new Date(company.remote_created_at) | |
| : null, | |
| modified_at: new Date(), | |
| remote_was_deleted: company.remote_was_deleted || false, | |
| }; | |
| if (existingCompany) { | |
| existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.update({ | |
| where: { id_hris_company: existingCompany.id_hris_company }, | |
| data: companyData, | |
| }); | |
| } else { | |
| existingCompany = await this.prisma.hris_companies.create({ | |
| data: { | |
| ...companyData, | |
| id_hris_company: uuidv4(), | |
| created_at: new Date(), | |
| id_connection: connection_id, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| if (company.locations) { | |
| for (const loc of company.locations) { | |
| await this.prisma.hris_locations.update({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_hris_location: loc, | |
| }, | |
| data: { | |
| id_hris_company: existingCompany.id_hris_company, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| companyResults.push(existingCompany); | |
| // Process field mappings | |
| await this.ingestService.processFieldMappings( | |
| company.field_mappings, | |
| existingCompany.id_hris_company, | |
| originSource, | |
| linkedUserId, | |
| ); | |
| // Process remote data | |
| await this.ingestService.processRemoteData( | |
| existingCompany.id_hris_company, | |
| remote_data[i], | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| return companyResults; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 171-171: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
Outside diff range comments (4)
packages/api/src/accounting/taxrate/taxrate.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
75-80: Improve error handling ingetTaxRates.Currently, the method catches errors and rethrows them as generic errors. Consider using a more specific error handling strategy to provide better context and debugging information.
- } catch (error) { - throw new Error(error); + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error('Error retrieving tax rates', error); + throw new HttpException('Failed to retrieve tax rates', HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR);packages/api/src/accounting/creditnote/creditnote.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
75-80: Enhance error handling ingetCreditNotes.The current error handling approach is too generic. Consider logging the error and providing a more descriptive error response.
- } catch (error) { - throw new Error(error); + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error('Error retrieving credit notes', error); + throw new HttpException('Failed to retrieve credit notes', HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR);packages/api/src/accounting/transaction/transaction.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
75-80: Refine error handling ingetTransactions.The current error handling is generic. Consider adding logging and a more specific error response for better maintainability and debugging.
- } catch (error) { - throw new Error(error); + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error('Error retrieving transactions', error); + throw new HttpException('Failed to retrieve transactions', HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR);packages/api/src/@core/connections/connections.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
186-188:
Add error handling for JSON parsing.Wrap the
JSON.parsecall in a try-catch block to handle potential errors when parsing the state.let stateData: StateDataType; try { stateData = JSON.parse(decodeURIComponent(state)); } catch (parseError) { throw new ConnectionsError({ name: 'API_CALLBACK_STATE_PARSE_ERROR', message: `Failed to parse state JSON: ${parseError.message}`, }); }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
docker-compose.dev.ymlis excluded by!**/*.ymldocker-compose.source.ymlis excluded by!**/*.ymldocker-compose.ymlis excluded by!**/*.ymlpackages/api/swagger/swagger-spec.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (23)
- packages/api/scripts/init.sql (26 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/connections/connections.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/account/account.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/address/address.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/attachment/attachment.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/balancesheet/balancesheet.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/cashflowstatement/cashflowstatement.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/companyinfo/companyinfo.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/contact/contact.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/creditnote/creditnote.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/expense/expense.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/incomestatement/incomestatement.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/invoice/invoice.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/item/item.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/journalentry/journalentry.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/payment/payment.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/phonenumber/phonenumber.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/purchaseorder/purchaseorder.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/taxrate/taxrate.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/trackingcategory/trackingcategory.controller.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/transaction/transaction.controller.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/api/src/accounting/vendorcredit/vendorcredit.controller.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/ecommerce/customer/customer.module.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (28)
packages/api/src/ecommerce/customer/customer.module.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-19:
Formatting improvement acknowledged.The removal of the empty line between imports and the
@Moduledecorator contributes to cleaner code formatting. No functional impact.packages/api/src/accounting/item/item.controller.ts (1)
11-12: Enhanced data validation withValidationPipe.The use of
@UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true }))improves data integrity by validating and transforming incoming requests. Consider reviewing the decision to disable error messages, as it may affect debugging.Also applies to: 61-61
packages/api/src/accounting/address/address.controller.ts (1)
11-12: Improved request handling withValidationPipe.The integration of
@UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true }))ensures validated and transformed input data, enhancing robustness. Consider evaluating the impact of disabling error messages on error visibility.Also applies to: 114-114
packages/api/src/accounting/taxrate/taxrate.controller.ts (1)
61-61: Good use of ValidationPipe for input validation.The addition of
@UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true }))enhances input validation and data transformation.packages/api/src/accounting/creditnote/creditnote.controller.ts (1)
61-61: ValidationPipe enhances input validation.The use of
@UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true }))is a positive addition for ensuring data integrity.packages/api/src/accounting/transaction/transaction.controller.ts (1)
61-61: ValidationPipe is a valuable addition for input validation.The use of
@UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true }))ensures robust data handling.packages/api/src/accounting/phonenumber/phonenumber.controller.ts (1)
11-12: Enhance input validation withValidationPipe.The addition of
UsePipeswithValidationPipeimproves data validation by transforming and validating incoming requests. This change enhances the robustness of the API.packages/api/src/accounting/companyinfo/companyinfo.controller.ts (1)
11-12: Enhance input validation withValidationPipe.The use of
ValidationPipeensures that incoming data is validated and transformed, improving the reliability of the API endpoint.packages/api/src/accounting/balancesheet/balancesheet.controller.ts (1)
11-12: Enhance input validation withValidationPipe.Using
ValidationPipefor input validation ensures that only well-formed data is processed, enhancing API robustness.packages/api/src/accounting/vendorcredit/vendorcredit.controller.ts (2)
11-12: Enhance input validation withValidationPipe.The addition of
UsePipesandValidationPipefrom@nestjs/commonimproves input validation by transforming incoming data and disabling error messages. This enhances robustness and data integrity.
61-61: Ensure proper error handling ingetVendorCredits.The
ValidationPipeis configured to disable error messages. Consider logging the errors or providing a user-friendly response to aid in debugging.Verification successful
Ensure proper error handling in
getVendorCredits.The
catchblock in thegetVendorCreditsmethod rethrows the error without logging or providing a user-friendly response. Consider implementing logging or returning a more descriptive error message to aid in debugging and improve user experience.
- Location:
packages/api/src/accounting/vendorcredit/vendorcredit.controller.ts, line 61Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in `getVendorCredits` method. # Test: Search for error handling practices in `getVendorCredits`. Expect: Proper logging or user-friendly response. rg --type ts 'getVendorCredits' -A 10 | rg 'catch|logger'Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the contents of the catch block in the `getVendorCredits` method for logging or user-friendly responses. # Search for the `getVendorCredits` method and display more lines to inspect the catch block. rg --type ts 'getVendorCredits' -A 20Length of output: 5170
packages/api/src/accounting/incomestatement/incomestatement.controller.ts (1)
11-12: Enhance input validation withValidationPipe.The addition of
UsePipesandValidationPipefrom@nestjs/commonimproves input validation by transforming incoming data and disabling error messages. This enhances robustness and data integrity.packages/api/src/accounting/trackingcategory/trackingcategory.controller.ts (2)
11-12: Enhance input validation withValidationPipe.The addition of
UsePipesandValidationPipefrom@nestjs/commonimproves input validation by transforming incoming data and disabling error messages. This enhances robustness and data integrity.
73-73: Correct method naming for consistency.Renaming
getTrackingCategorystogetTrackingCategoriesaligns with standard pluralization conventions, improving code clarity and consistency.packages/api/src/accounting/cashflowstatement/cashflowstatement.controller.ts (1)
61-61: Input validation enhancement with security consideration.The addition of
UsePipeswithValidationPipeimproves input validation and transformation. ThedisableErrorMessages: trueoption enhances security by preventing detailed error messages from being exposed to the client.packages/api/src/accounting/account/account.controller.ts (1)
62-62: Enhanced input validation withValidationPipe.The use of
UsePipeswithValidationPipein thegetAccountsmethod ensures robust input validation and transformation. ThedisableErrorMessages: trueoption is a commendable security measure to prevent exposing internal validation errors.packages/api/src/accounting/expense/expense.controller.ts (1)
62-62: Improved input validation withValidationPipe.The introduction of
UsePipeswithValidationPipein thegetExpensesmethod enhances input validation and transformation. ThedisableErrorMessages: trueoption is a prudent security practice to avoid exposing detailed error messages.packages/api/src/accounting/invoice/invoice.controller.ts (1)
62-62: Consider enabling error messages inValidationPipe.While suppressing error messages (
disableErrorMessages: true) can streamline responses, it may hinder debugging and user feedback. Consider enabling them, especially in development environments.Verification successful
Consistent Use of
disableErrorMessages: trueAcross ControllersThe
disableErrorMessages: truesetting inValidationPipeis consistently applied across multiple controllers in the codebase, indicating a deliberate choice to suppress error messages. If enabling error messages is necessary for debugging or user feedback, consider proposing this as a global change rather than altering it in a single controller.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if `disableErrorMessages` is used elsewhere in the codebase to ensure consistent error handling. # Test: Search for `disableErrorMessages` usage. Expect: Consistent usage across controllers. rg --type ts 'disableErrorMessages: true'Length of output: 8690
packages/api/src/accounting/payment/payment.controller.ts (1)
62-62: Consider enabling error messages inValidationPipe.While suppressing error messages (
disableErrorMessages: true) can streamline responses, it may hinder debugging and user feedback. Consider enabling them, especially in development environments.packages/api/src/accounting/contact/contact.controller.ts (1)
62-62: Consider enabling error messages inValidationPipe.While suppressing error messages (
disableErrorMessages: true) can streamline responses, it may hinder debugging and user feedback. Consider enabling them, especially in development environments.packages/api/src/accounting/attachment/attachment.controller.ts (1)
114-114: Verify the impact of suppressing error messages.The
ValidationPipeis configured withdisableErrorMessages: true, which suppresses error messages. This could hinder debugging and user feedback. Consider whether this is the intended behavior.Verification successful
Consistent Use of ValidationPipe with Suppressed Error Messages
The
ValidationPipewithdisableErrorMessages: trueis consistently used across multiple controllers in the codebase. This suggests a deliberate design choice, possibly for security or uniform error handling. However, consider verifying if this aligns with the intended user experience and debugging needs.
- Instances found in controllers such as
order.controller.ts,product.controller.ts,fulfillment.controller.ts, and many others.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of ValidationPipe with `disableErrorMessages: true` across the codebase. # Test: Search for other instances of ValidationPipe with `disableErrorMessages: true`. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type ts '@UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true }))'Length of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all instances of ValidationPipe usage across the codebase to verify `disableErrorMessages` configuration. # Search for ValidationPipe usage in TypeScript files. rg --type ts 'ValidationPipe' -A 5Length of output: 67105
packages/api/src/accounting/journalentry/journalentry.controller.ts (1)
62-62: Verify the impact of suppressing error messages.The
ValidationPipeis configured withdisableErrorMessages: true, which suppresses error messages. This could hinder debugging and user feedback. Consider whether this is the intended behavior.packages/api/src/accounting/purchaseorder/purchaseorder.controller.ts (1)
62-62: Verify the impact of suppressing error messages.The
ValidationPipeis configured withdisableErrorMessages: true, which suppresses error messages. This could hinder debugging and user feedback. Consider whether this is the intended behavior.packages/api/src/@core/connections/connections.controller.ts (2)
Line range hint
222-228:
LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly uses the Prisma service to fetch connections.
Line range hint
239-245:
LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly uses the Prisma service to fetch connections.
packages/api/scripts/init.sql (3)
Line range hint
1921-1939:
Ensure correct foreign key constraints forhris_dependents.Verify that the foreign key constraints for
id_hris_employeein thehris_dependentstable are correctly defined and maintained.Verification successful
Foreign Key Constraint Verified for
id_hris_employeeinhris_dependentsThe foreign key constraint for
id_hris_employeein thehris_dependentstable is correctly defined and references thehris_employeestable. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify foreign key constraints in the `hris_dependents` table. # Test: Check for foreign key constraints related to `id_hris_employee`. rg --type sql $'FOREIGN KEY (id_hris_employee)' -A 2Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any foreign key definitions in SQL files. # Test: Look for all foreign key constraints in the SQL files to identify any related to `id_hris_employee`. rg --type sql 'FOREIGN KEY' -A 5Length of output: 17441
283-283: Ensure consistent usage of NOT NULL constraints.The
id_connectionfield in thehris_employer_benefitstable is marked as NOT NULL. Ensure that this constraint is consistently applied across related tables to maintain data integrity.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of NOT NULL Constraints Verified
The
id_connectionfield is consistently marked asNOT NULLacross all related tables in theinit.sqlfile. This ensures data integrity as required. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify NOT NULL constraints for `id_connection` across related tables. # Test: Check for NOT NULL constraints on `id_connection` in HRIS-related tables. rg --type sql $'id_connection uuid NOT NULL' -A 2Length of output: 407
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of `id_connection` in SQL scripts to verify NOT NULL constraints across related tables. # Search for `id_connection` in SQL files to identify related tables. rg --type sql 'id_connection' -A 5Length of output: 39034
1952-1957: Review foreign key constraints forhris_benefits.Ensure that the foreign key constraints for
id_hris_employeeandid_hris_employer_benefitin thehris_benefitstable are correctly defined and maintained.Verification successful
Foreign key constraints for
hris_benefitsare correctly defined.The
hris_benefitstable includes foreign key constraints forid_hris_employeeandid_hris_employer_benefit, referencinghris_employeesandhris_employer_benefitstables, respectively. No issues found.
CONSTRAINT FK_hris_benefit_employer_benefit_Id FOREIGN KEY ( id_hris_employer_benefit ) REFERENCES hris_employer_benefits ( id_hris_employer_benefit )CONSTRAINT FK_hris_benefits_employeeId FOREIGN KEY ( id_hris_employee ) REFERENCES hris_employees ( id_hris_employee )Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify foreign key constraints in the `hris_benefits` table. # Test: Check for foreign key constraints related to `id_hris_employee` and `id_hris_employer_benefit`. rg --type sql $'FOREIGN KEY (id_hris_employee)' -A 2 rg --type sql $'FOREIGN KEY (id_hris_employer_benefit)' -A 2Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `hris_benefits` table definition and foreign key constraints. # Find the definition of the `hris_benefits` table. rg --type sql 'CREATE TABLE hris_benefits' -A 20 # Check for foreign key constraints related to `id_hris_employee` and `id_hris_employer_benefit` in all SQL files. rg --type sql 'FOREIGN KEY' -A 5Length of output: 19201
| import { | ||
| ApiGetCustomResponse, | ||
| ApiPaginatedResponse, | ||
| } from '@@core/utils/dtos/openapi.respone.dto'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve import organization for readability.
The restructuring of import statements enhances code readability and maintainability. This is a good practice for larger codebases.
| UsePipes, | ||
| ValidationPipe, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent import order.
The imports for UsePipes and ValidationPipe are correctly added. Ensure consistent ordering with existing imports for maintainability.
| ApiGetCustomResponse, | ||
| ApiPaginatedResponse, | ||
| } from '@@core/utils/dtos/openapi.respone.dto'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve import statement organization.
Grouping ApiGetCustomResponse and ApiPaginatedResponse together enhances code readability and maintainability.
| import { | ||
| ApiGetCustomResponse, | ||
| ApiPaginatedResponse, | ||
| } from '@@core/utils/dtos/openapi.respone.dto'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve import organization for readability.
Reorganizing import statements into a structured block enhances readability and maintainability.
| import { | ||
| ApiGetCustomResponse, | ||
| ApiPaginatedResponse, | ||
| } from '@@core/utils/dtos/openapi.respone.dto'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve import organization for readability.
The restructured import statements contribute to better code organization and readability.
packages/api/scripts/init.sql
Outdated
| id_hris_company uuid NULL, | ||
| id_hris_employee uuid NULL, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Foreign key constraints missing in hris_locations
The hris_locations table does not have foreign key constraints defined for id_hris_company and id_hris_employee. Please verify if this is intentional or if constraints should be added to maintain data integrity.
id_hris_companyandid_hris_employeeare not constrained inhris_locations.
Analysis chain
Verify foreign key relationships.
Ensure that the foreign key relationships for id_hris_company and id_hris_employee in hris_locations are correctly defined and maintained.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify foreign key relationships in the `hris_locations` table.
# Test: Check for foreign key constraints related to `id_hris_company` and `id_hris_employee`.
rg --type sql $'FOREIGN KEY (id_hris_company)' -A 2
rg --type sql $'FOREIGN KEY (id_hris_employee)' -A 2
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the `CREATE TABLE` statement for `hris_locations` and check for foreign key definitions.
# Find the `CREATE TABLE` statement for `hris_locations`.
rg --type sql $'CREATE TABLE hris_locations' -A 20
# Check for foreign key definitions in the `hris_locations` table.
rg --type sql 'FOREIGN KEY' -A 2
Length of output: 13206
packages/api/scripts/init.sql
Outdated
| @@ -2621,6 +2582,7 @@ | |||
| street_1 text NULL, | |||
| street_2 text NULL, | |||
| city text NULL, | |||
| remote_id text NULL, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Foreign key constraints for id_acc_contact and id_acc_company_info are missing.
The acc_addresses table does not currently define foreign key constraints for the id_acc_contact and id_acc_company_info columns. If these constraints are necessary for data integrity, consider adding them to the table definition.
- File:
packages/api/scripts/init.sql - Location: Table
acc_addressesdefinition
Analysis chain
Ensure correct foreign key constraints in acc_addresses.
Verify that the foreign key constraints for id_acc_contact and id_acc_company_info in the acc_addresses table are correctly defined and maintained.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify foreign key constraints in the `acc_addresses` table.
# Test: Check for foreign key constraints related to `id_acc_contact` and `id_acc_company_info`.
rg --type sql $'FOREIGN KEY (id_acc_contact)' -A 2
rg --type sql $'FOREIGN KEY (id_acc_company_info)' -A 2
Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the `acc_addresses` table definition and related foreign key constraints.
# Find the definition of the `acc_addresses` table.
rg --type sql 'CREATE TABLE acc_addresses' -A 20
# Check for any foreign key constraints in the SQL files.
rg --type sql 'FOREIGN KEY' -A 2
Length of output: 13159
| @@ -54,6 +58,7 @@ | |||
| }) | |||
| @ApiPaginatedResponse(UnifiedAccountingTrackingcategoryOutput) | |||
| @UseGuards(ApiKeyAuthGuard) | |||
| @UsePipes(new ValidationPipe({ transform: true, disableErrorMessages: true })) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Consider enhancing error handling in getTrackingCategorys.
The getTrackingCategorys method currently catches errors but simply rethrows them as generic Error objects. This approach does not provide additional context or logging, which could aid in debugging. Consider logging the error details or throwing more specific exceptions to improve error traceability.
- Location:
packages/api/src/accounting/trackingcategory/trackingcategory.controller.ts, lines containingcatchblock.
Analysis chain
Ensure proper error handling in getTrackingCategorys.
The ValidationPipe is configured to disable error messages. Consider logging the errors or providing a user-friendly response to aid in debugging.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling in `getTrackingCategorys` method.
# Test: Search for error handling practices in `getTrackingCategorys`. Expect: Proper logging or user-friendly response.
rg --type ts 'getTrackingCategorys' -A 10 | rg 'catch|logger'
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the complete implementation of the `getTrackingCategorys` method
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'getTrackingCategorys($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 532
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the `getTrackingCategorys` method definition and its surrounding context
rg --type ts 'getTrackingCategorys' -A 20 -B 5
Length of output: 2850
packages/api/scripts/init.sql
Outdated
| remote_id text NULL, | ||
| remote_created_at timestamp with time zone NULL, | ||
| created_at timestamp with time zone NOT NULL, | ||
| modified_at timestamp with time zone NOT NULL, | ||
| remote_was_deleted boolean NOT NULL, | ||
| id_connection uuid NOT NULL, | ||
| manager uuid NULL, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Review indexing strategy for hris_employees: Missing index on remote_id.
The hris_employees table has an index on id_hris_company, but there is no index found for remote_id. If remote_id is frequently queried, consider adding an index to improve query performance.
id_hris_companyis indexed withFKX_employee_companyId.- No index found for
remote_id.
Analysis chain
Review indexing strategy for hris_employees.
The hris_employees table includes several fields. Ensure that appropriate indexes are in place for fields frequently used in queries to optimize performance.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify indexing strategy for frequently queried fields in `hris_employees`.
# Test: Check for indexes on fields like `id_hris_company` and `remote_id`.
rg --type sql $'CREATE INDEX' -A 2 | grep 'hris_employees'
Length of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract detailed information about indexes on the `hris_employees` table.
# Find all index definitions related to `hris_employees` and display the associated columns.
rg --type sql 'CREATE INDEX' -A 5 | grep -A 5 'hris_employees'
Length of output: 655
packages/api/scripts/init.sql
Outdated
| @@ -2423,6 +2383,7 @@ | |||
| id_acc_phone_number uuid NOT NULL, | |||
| "number" text NULL, | |||
| type text NULL, | |||
| remote_id text NULL, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Missing Foreign Key Constraint for id_acc_contact in acc_phone_numbers
The acc_phone_numbers table includes an id_acc_contact column, but there is no foreign key constraint linking it to another table. This might be an oversight and should be verified or corrected.
- Ensure that
id_acc_contactinacc_phone_numbershas a corresponding foreign key constraint if it is intended to reference another table.
Analysis chain
Check for correct foreign key constraints in acc_phone_numbers.
Verify that the foreign key constraints for id_acc_contact in the acc_phone_numbers table are correctly defined and maintained.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify foreign key constraints in the `acc_phone_numbers` table.
# Test: Check for foreign key constraints related to `id_acc_contact`.
rg --type sql $'FOREIGN KEY (id_acc_contact)' -A 2
Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the definition of the `acc_phone_numbers` table and inspect its schema for `id_acc_contact`.
# Search for the `acc_phone_numbers` table definition.
rg --type sql -A 10 'CREATE TABLE acc_phone_numbers'
# Search for any references to `id_acc_contact` in SQL files.
rg --type sql 'id_acc_contact'
Length of output: 2245
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
GustoCompanyMapperfor unifying Gusto company data into HRIS format.Bug Fixes
Documentation