Split ci actions #418
Split ci actions #418
Conversation
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@rflihxyz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe updates primarily involve reorganizing GitHub Actions workflows for Docker builds across different frontend environments, separating the build processes for "Dashboard" and "Magic Links". Additionally, a minor text change enhances clarity in a TypeScript file, and a Dockerfile is refined by adjusting how certain files are handled. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/docker.check-build.dashboard.selfhosted.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/docker.check-build.magiclinks.selfhosted.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/docker.export.frontend-dashboard.selfhosted.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/docker.export.frontend-magiclinks.selfhosted.yml (1 hunks)
- apps/client-ts/src/app/(Dashboard)/api-keys/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/api/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- .github/workflows/docker.check-build.dashboard.selfhosted.yml
- .github/workflows/docker.check-build.magiclinks.selfhosted.yml
- .github/workflows/docker.export.frontend-dashboard.selfhosted.yml
- apps/client-ts/src/app/(Dashboard)/api-keys/page.tsx
- packages/api/Dockerfile
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/docker.export.frontend-magiclinks.selfhosted.yml (3)
3-6: Trigger configuration looks good for deployment pipelines.
9-12: Job configuration is appropriate for the intended CI tasks.
14-36: Ensure the Dockerfile path and the handling of secrets are secure and correct.Verification successful
The Dockerfile path specified in the GitHub Actions workflow file has been confirmed to exist at
./apps/magic-link/Dockerfile. Additionally, the review of the workflow files did not reveal any direct exposure or insecure handling of secrets. The secrets are used within the context of GitHub Actions environment variables, which is a secure practice as long as the GitHub repository settings are properly configured to restrict access to these secrets.Conclusion:
- The Dockerfile path is correct and exists as specified.
- The handling of secrets in the workflow files adheres to secure practices.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Dockerfile path and the handling of secrets. # Test: Check if the Dockerfile exists at the specified path. fd Dockerfile --exec test -f {} \; -a -path './apps/magic-link/Dockerfile' # Test: Ensure that secrets are not logged or exposed in any step. rg --type yaml 'secrets' .github/workflows/Length of output: 9152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Dockerfile path and the handling of secrets. # Test: Check if the Dockerfile exists at the specified path. fd Dockerfile --exec test -f {} \; -a -path './apps/magic-link/Dockerfile' # Test: Ensure that secrets are not logged or exposed in any step. rg --type yaml 'secrets' .github/workflows/Length of output: 9152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to verify the Dockerfile path. # Correcting the fd command to remove the erroneous '-type' flag and properly check the existence of the Dockerfile at the specified path. fd Dockerfile --exec test -f {} \; -a -path './apps/magic-link/Dockerfile'Length of output: 246
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Additional script to check for potential exposure of secrets in logs. # This script searches for any potential logging of secrets in the workflow files, which could indicate insecure handling. rg 'echo.*secrets' .github/workflows/ --type yamlLength of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to verify the Dockerfile path without any erroneous flags. # This command checks if the Dockerfile exists at the specified path without using any incorrect flags. fd Dockerfile --exec test -f {} \; --full-path './apps/magic-link/Dockerfile'Length of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Simplified script to directly verify the existence of the Dockerfile at the specified path. # Using a basic test command to check if the Dockerfile exists. test -f ./apps/magic-link/Dockerfile && echo "Dockerfile exists" || echo "Dockerfile does not exist"Length of output: 83
No description provided.