Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡ Added API Rate Limit as described in issue 56 #205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023

Conversation

Sachinsharma01
Copy link

Added API Rate Limit as described in issue 56, Used nest js package throttle for applying rate limit to APIs the throttle limit and throttle ttl are to be added in .env as THROTTLER_LIMIT and THROTTLE_TTL respectively.

… throttle for applying rate limit to APIs the throttle limit and throttle ttl are to be added in .env as THROTTLER_LIMIT and THROTTLE_TTL respectively

Added API Rate Limit as described in issue 56, Used nest js package throttle for applying rate limit to APIs the throttle limit and throttle ttl are to be added in .env
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 29, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 74e46f9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 29, 2023

👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review

Review these changes using an interactive CodeSee Map

Legend

CodeSee Map legend

@naelob
Copy link
Contributor

naelob commented Dec 29, 2023

Added API Rate Limit as described in issue 56, Used nest js package throttle for applying rate limit to APIs the throttle limit and throttle ttl are to be added in .env as THROTTLER_LIMIT and THROTTLE_TTL respectively.

Thank you very much good job !

@naelob naelob merged commit 12d82db into panoratech:main Dec 29, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants