Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug Fix: #60343 Construction of Series / Index fails from dict keys when "str" dtype is specified explicitly #60383

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tasfia8
Copy link

@tasfia8 tasfia8 commented Nov 21, 2024

To fix the issue:

  • KeyView was introduced to identify and preprocess dict_keys before passing them to Pandas internals. The keys are now converted to a list for compatibility.

  • Updated logic in Index and sanitize_array to map dtype="str" to StringDtype(storage="python"). Updated check_array_indexer to allow empty boolean indexers for StringArray

  • New test added "test_index_from_dict_keys_with_dtype" to ensure:
    Default inference (pd.Index(d.keys())) works.
    Explicit dtype="str" works, resulting in string[python].

  • Updated existing tests (test_is_object and test_empty_fancy) to handle new behaviours introduced by the fix.

After the fix both the default (pd.Index(d.keys())) and explicit (pd.Index(d.keys(), dtype="str")) cases work:
Screenshot 2024-11-19 at 3 17 08 AM

@tasfia8
Copy link
Author

tasfia8 commented Nov 21, 2024

Hi, I'm a student contributing to this PR and am on bit of a time crunch due to finals. For my school project, my task is to merge the PR as quickly as possible with the help and guidance of maintainers. I was able to fix the bug but I am a bit stuck on how to fix the checks. Could @jorisvandenbossche or anyone else help? Especially the unit tests ones. I tried to fix the pre-commit (using ruff lint fix) but every time I fixed a formatting issue, after running pre-commit it goes to the initial position before I did the fix.

For the Doc build and upload check (it was giving an error for every declaration of ipython that didn't have import pandas as pd), I manually inserted it but don't know if there is an easy way.

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the 2.3 milestone Nov 23, 2024
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added Strings String extension data type and string data Constructors Series/DataFrame/Index/pd.array Constructors labels Nov 23, 2024
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

For the Doc build and upload check (it was giving an error for every declaration of ipython that didn't have import pandas as pd), I manually inserted it but don't know if there is an easy way.

That should normally not have been needed. Did you get those errors locally? (in that case maybe something with the set up was wrong)
On the CI build I see that there is an error specifically in the doc/source/getting_started/comparison/includes/nth_word.rst file.

Copy link
Member

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this!

I added a few comments. It seems you have made more changes than I think would be needed to fix it. I would try to focus the PR a bit more (also, only fixing either Index or Series constructor would also be fine)

return (
isinstance(arr_or_dtype, np.dtype)
and arr_or_dtype == "object"
or isinstance(arr_or_dtype, StringDtype)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't want to change the meaning of is_object_dtype to also include StringDtype. What was the reason you needed this change?

Comment on lines -163 to +165
df = DataFrame(
{
"A": range(3),
"B": range(3),
"C": range(3)
}
).rename(columns={"B": "A"})
df = DataFrame({"A": range(3), "B": range(3), "C": range(3)}).rename(
columns={"B": "A"}
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems you included some unintended formatting changes. Maybe some setting in the IDE you are using that is conflicting with the formatting defaults in pandas?
I would recommend you to set up the pre-commit hook, which will ensure the code is formatted correctly when committing (see https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/development/contributing_codebase.html#pre-commit)

Comment on lines +600 to +601
if isinstance(data, KeysView):
data = list(data)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is the critical part that is indeed fixing the issue (for Series(..) at least), and so this is a good change.

I would just make the if check more generic. Because while the example was using dict.keys(), you also have other iterables (e.g. the dict.values()) that will have the same problem, and we should try to fix it for all of them.

Looking at the logic just below for the non-ExtensionDtype cases, there is a if hasattr(data, "__array__") and then after that in the final else it is also doing a data = list(data). So maybe the check above could be if not hasattr(data, "__array__") instead of if isinstance(data, KeysView).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Constructors Series/DataFrame/Index/pd.array Constructors Strings String extension data type and string data
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG (string): contruction of Series / Index fails from dict keys when "str" dtype is specified explicitly
2 participants