Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix spelling mistakes #296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

andre-nguyen
Copy link

Related Issues & PRs

None

Summary of Changes

Just some spelling fixes, mostly on comments except. Only function name that was changed was make_point_cloud_procssor.

Validation

--

@Samahu Samahu self-requested a review February 14, 2024 17:52
@Samahu Samahu added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Samahu Samahu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Andre, really appreciate that!

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ class PointCloudProcessorFactory {
}

template <typename PointT>
static LidarScanProcessor make_point_cloud_procssor(
static LidarScanProcessor make_point_cloud_processor(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤦‍♂️ Oh no, I can't believe my eyes 👀
Thanks for catching that.

@Samahu Samahu merged commit 3f97907 into ouster-lidar:ros2 Feb 14, 2024
3 checks passed
Samahu added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2024
Samahu added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2024
AchmadFathoni pushed a commit to AchmadFathoni/ouster-ros that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
EirikKolas added a commit to vortexntnu/ouster-lidar-ros2-driver that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2024
* SW-5607: rename package ouster_msgs to avoid package name conflict in ros index (ouster-lidar#244)

* rename package ouster_msgs to avoid conflict name conflict in ros index
* set ouster_sensor_msgs version number to match with ouster_ros package

* SW-5466: Support Velodyne and other point types in ouster-ros driver (ouster-lidar#216)

* Quick protoype of Velodyne point type
* Add PointXYZIR point type + other major pcl point types
* Include point meta functions and point transform by the ouster_ros namesapce
* Wrap point meta functions with a namespace and use shorter names for the functions +
* Add a seed test module for the point_cloud_compose methods +
 Add description for the point_cloud_compose methods + refactor code and add compile time checks.
* Propagate error state, warn about potential incompatible profile, propagate error state
* Add minimal documentation about the new `point_type` parameter.

* SW-5466: Support Velodyne point type in the ROS driver amendments (ouster-lidar#254)

* Add support to control point_type through launch.xml files +
* Add a note to CHANGELOG about the breaking change for ptp/utc time offset

* SW-5623: Bump up ouster_client to 20231031 release (ouster-lidar#262)

* Bump ouster-client to 2023103 release
* fix: gracefully stop the driver when shutdown is requested.

* ROS-196: laser scan from ros driver is not properly aligned with point cloud [humble] (ouster-lidar#203)

* Apply destagger to laser scan + Add laser to RVIZ
* Align LaserScan with the PointCloud
* Apply proper pixel shift
* Resolve the issue of zeroed laserscan on dual mode
* Address an issue where LaserScan appeared different on FW prior to 2.4
* Fix the issue for odd numbers
* List selected sensors on the main page + Update RVIZ config to highlight the 2D LaserScan.

* Use timeout when waiting for packets to be proceed in case they don't come (ouster-lidar#293)

* docs: fix spelling mistakes (ouster-lidar#296)

---------

Co-authored-by: Ussama Naal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andre Nguyen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants