-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: fixed the problem of global search js resource access failure #2623
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes across several files, primarily focusing on the removal and modification of the DocSearch functionality. The Changes
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
examples/sites/src/main.js (1)
34-35
: Consider pinning DocSearch dependency versionsTo ensure consistent builds and prevent unexpected breaking changes, consider specifying exact versions for the DocSearch imports.
-import docsearch from '@docsearch/js' -import '@docsearch/css' +import docsearch from '@docsearch/[email protected]' +import '@docsearch/[email protected]'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
examples/sites/index.html
(1 hunks)examples/sites/package.json
(2 hunks)examples/sites/src/App.vue
(0 hunks)examples/sites/src/main.js
(1 hunks)examples/sites/src/style.css
(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- examples/sites/src/App.vue
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- examples/sites/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
examples/sites/src/main.js
46-46: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
examples/sites/src/style.css (3)
7-8
: LGTM: Font weight fix is appropriate.
The explicit font-weight definition correctly addresses the reset.css side effect.
26-27
: LGTM: Grid cell alignment is properly defined.
The vertical alignment rule follows standard grid styling practices.
47-47
: LGTM: Fixed missing semicolon in transition property.
The syntax error has been correctly addressed.
examples/sites/index.html (2)
30-30
: LGTM! Removal of jsdelivr CDN dependencies.
The change aligns with the PR objective to fix jsdelivr loading errors by moving away from CDN-hosted dependencies.
30-30
: Verify search box initialization.
The search box div has been added, but its functionality depends on proper initialization from other files.
Let's verify the search initialization code:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the search box implementation.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Search box is properly initialized with DocSearch
The search box initialization is properly handled in examples/sites/src/main.js
using DocSearch:
docsearch({
appId: 'AGPA5UXHMH',
apiKey: '5fa09fc20270efa61d68e2c2eb0f56df',
indexName: 'opentiny',
container: '.search-box',
debug: false
})
The search box also has proper styling defined in examples/sites/src/style.css
for positioning and z-index handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify search box initialization in main.js and related files
# Check main.js for search initialization
echo "Checking main.js for search initialization:"
rg -A 5 "search-box" ./src/main.js
# Check for any DocSearch related imports
echo "Checking for DocSearch imports:"
rg "@docsearch" ./src/main.js
# Check if the search-box class is styled
echo "Checking for search-box styles:"
rg "search-box" -g "*.css" -g "*.scss"
Length of output: 587
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of style.css to understand the search box styling
echo "Checking search box styles in style.css:"
cat examples/sites/src/style.css
# Look for any JavaScript files that might handle search functionality
echo -e "\nLooking for JavaScript files in examples/sites:"
fd -e js examples/sites
# Check for any search-related code in JavaScript files
echo -e "\nChecking for search-related code in JS files:"
rg -i "search" examples/sites --type js -A 5
Length of output: 101035
examples/sites/src/main.js (2)
37-37
: LGTM!
Good practice using environment variable with a fallback value.
34-51
: Verify alignment with PR objectives
The PR is titled "Fix load jsdelivr error" but the changes primarily implement DocSearch integration. Please clarify:
- How these changes address the jsdelivr loading issue
- If there are missing changes related to the jsdelivr fix
- If the PR title/description needs updating to reflect the actual changes
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
46-46: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
if (envTarget === 'open') { | ||
docsearch({ | ||
appId: 'AGPA5UXHMH', | ||
apiKey: '5fa09fc20270efa61d68e2c2eb0f56df', | ||
indexName: 'opentiny', | ||
container: '.search-box', | ||
debug: false | ||
}) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Security: DocSearch credentials require proper configuration
The hardcoded DocSearch credentials should be moved to environment variables. While these are client-side API keys, it's still a best practice to:
- Create a
.env
file inexamples/sites/
directory - Add the following variables:
VITE_DOCSEARCH_APP_ID=AGPA5UXHMH
VITE_DOCSEARCH_API_KEY=5fa09fc20270efa61d68e2c2eb0f56df
- Update the code as suggested in the diff
- Add
.env
to.gitignore
if not already present
The Vite configuration already supports environment variables through loadEnv()
, so this change aligns with the existing setup.
🔗 Analysis chain
Security: Move API credentials to environment variables
The DocSearch API credentials are currently hardcoded in the source code. While DocSearch's client-side API keys are designed to be public, it's still a security best practice to:
- Move these credentials to environment variables
- Document their usage
- Enable appropriate CORS and rate limiting on the DocSearch application side
Apply this diff to use environment variables:
if (envTarget === 'open') {
docsearch({
- appId: 'AGPA5UXHMH',
- apiKey: '5fa09fc20270efa61d68e2c2eb0f56df',
+ appId: import.meta.env.VITE_DOCSEARCH_APP_ID,
+ apiKey: import.meta.env.VITE_DOCSEARCH_API_KEY,
indexName: 'opentiny',
container: '.search-box',
debug: false
})
}
Also, verify the DocSearch application settings:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the DocSearch application has appropriate CORS settings
# Note: This requires the gh CLI to be authenticated
# Check if there are any existing issues about CORS configuration
gh issue list --search "docsearch cors" --limit 5
# Check if there are any security-related discussions
gh issue list --search "docsearch security" --limit 5
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if these are indeed Algolia DocSearch credentials and if there's any documentation about their usage
# Check for any environment variable setup in the repository
rg -l "VITE_DOCSEARCH|ALGOLIA|DOCSEARCH" --type env
# Look for any documentation mentioning DocSearch setup
rg -l "docsearch|algolia" --type md
# Check if these credentials are used elsewhere in the codebase
rg "AGPA5UXHMH|5fa09fc20270efa61d68e2c2eb0f56df"
# Look for any existing environment variable usage with DocSearch
rg "import\.meta\.env\.VITE_DOCSEARCH"
Length of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any existing environment configuration files and documentation about environment setup
# Look for common environment file patterns
fd -e env -e env.example -e env.local -e env.development -e env.production
# Check the changelog for any DocSearch related information
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/webdoc/changelog.md
# Look for any configuration or setup files
fd -e config.js -e config.ts
# Check package.json for Algolia/DocSearch dependencies
fd package.json -x cat {}
Length of output: 68024
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if there are any environment variable configurations in the Vite setup
# Check for any Vite config files
fd -e vite.config.js -e vite.config.ts
# Look for any environment files in the examples/sites directory
fd -t f . examples/sites/ -x file {}
# Check if these credentials are used in any configuration files
rg -C 3 "VITE_DOCSEARCH" --type js --type ts --type json
Length of output: 65565
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for environment files and configuration in a simpler way
# Look for .env files
ls -la examples/sites/.env* 2>/dev/null
# Check the Vite config file directly
cat examples/sites/vite.config.js 2>/dev/null
cat examples/sites/vite.config.ts 2>/dev/null
# Look for any documentation about environment setup
rg -l "VITE_DOCSEARCH|environment variable" --type md
Length of output: 5266
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
46-46: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
…2623) * fix: fixed the problem of global search js resource access failure * feat: update docs version
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
b
andstrong
tags..DocSearch-Button
class.