fix(docs): [anchor] Optimize the anchor document. #2495
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes to Vue components related to anchor functionality. It removes the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
bug
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/change.spec.ts (2)
19-20: Enhance test assertions for better coverage.The current assertions only partially verify the expected behavior:
- Second console message is not validated
- The string matching is too permissive
- Actual anchor values should be verified
Consider strengthening the assertions:
- expect(values.length).toBe(2) - expect(values[0].startsWith('当前锚点#demonstrate')).toBeTruthy() + expect(values).toHaveLength(2) + expect(values[0]).toBe('当前锚点#demonstrate') + expect(values[1]).toBe('当前锚点#change-event')
Line range hint
1-21: Consider improving test structure and documentation.The test could benefit from:
- Better isolation by resetting state between interactions
- JSDoc documentation explaining the test's purpose
- More descriptive test name using
test.describeConsider this structure:
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test' +/** + * Tests the anchor change event functionality: + * - Verifies console messages when navigating between anchors + * - Ensures proper anchor change event handling + */ +test.describe('Anchor Component', () => { -test('change事件', async ({ page }) => { + test('should emit console messages on anchor navigation', async ({ page }) => {examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/change.vue (1)
52-52: Consider enhancing the console message for better documentation.While the change from modal to console.log is appropriate for a documentation example, we could make the logged message more descriptive for developers following the documentation.
- console.log(`当前锚点${link}`) + console.log(`Anchor changed to: ${link}`)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/set-container.vue (3)
81-83: Consider using a more moderate font size.While center alignment improves the demo's presentation, a font size of 24px might be too large for documentation examples. Consider using a smaller size (e.g., 18px) for better balance with the surrounding documentation.
.scroll-container { height: 40vh; overflow: auto; text-align: center; - font-size: 24px; + font-size: 18px; }
84-85: Consider using fixed padding instead of percentage.Using percentage-based padding (20%) can lead to inconsistent spacing across different viewport heights. For a documentation example, consider using a fixed padding value to ensure consistent presentation.
.scroll-container > div { - padding-top: 20%; + padding-top: 2rem; }
89-89: Background color changes look good but consider softer tones.The solid colors provide better visual distinction between sections, which is great for the demo. However, consider using slightly softer tones to reduce visual fatigue in documentation.
.sec-1 { - background: #b6d4f2; + background: #e8f0f8; } .sec-2 { - background: #c2c2c2; + background: #f0f0f0; } .sec-3 { - background: #fff4e8; + background: #faf6f0; } .sec-3-1 { - background: #b9e683; + background: #f0f8e8; } .sec-3-2 { - background: #f2c5c2; + background: #f8f0f0; }Also applies to: 93-93, 96-96, 100-100, 104-104
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/change-composition-api.vue(2 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/change.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/change.vue(2 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/set-container-composition-api.vue(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/set-container.vue(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/change-composition-api.vue (2)
7-7: LGTM! Import cleanup improves code focus.
The removal of unused TinyModal import and retaining only the necessary TinyAnchor import helps keep the demo focused and reduces unnecessary dependencies.
45-45: LGTM! Simplified event handling for documentation.
The console.log implementation is more appropriate for a documentation demo as it:
- Provides immediate feedback in the browser's console
- Simplifies the demonstration of the change event
- Removes the dependency on modal dialogs
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/change.vue (1)
6-6: LGTM! Clean import statement.
The removal of unused TinyModal import keeps the code clean and focused.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/set-container-composition-api.vue (3)
Line range hint 1-69: LGTM! Clean implementation using Vue Composition API
The component structure follows Vue best practices with proper event handling and clean organization.
70-74: Good styling improvements for readability
The added text alignment, font size, and padding enhance the visual presentation of the content.
78-78: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility
While the solid background colors provide good visual separation between sections, ensure they maintain sufficient contrast with the text for accessibility.
Consider adding CSS custom properties (variables) for these colors to maintain consistency and make future theme adjustments easier:
<style scoped>
+:root {
+ --anchor-bg-sec1: #b6d4f2;
+ --anchor-bg-sec2: #c2c2c2;
+ --anchor-bg-sec3: #fff4e8;
+ --anchor-bg-sec3-1: #b9e683;
+ --anchor-bg-sec3-2: #f2c5c2;
+}
.sec-1 {
- background: #b6d4f2;
+ background: var(--anchor-bg-sec1);
}
// Apply similar changes to other sections
</style>Also applies to: 82-82, 85-85, 89-89, 93-93
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the color usage in the codebase.
Let me check the text colors used in the anchor component to verify contrast with the background colors.
Let me try a different approach to check the component's styles.
Color contrast appears sufficient for accessibility
The background colors used (#b6d4f2, #c2c2c2, #fff4e8, #b9e683, #f2c5c2) have good contrast with the black text (font-size: 24px). The text is large and the colors are muted/pastel shades that maintain readability. The suggestion to use CSS variables is a good enhancement but not critical for accessibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any existing color contrast testing configurations or accessibility guidelines
rg -i "contrast|accessibility|a11y" --type md
Length of output: 613
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for color-related configurations and theme files
rg -i "theme|color" --type css -A 2 -B 2
# Also check for any design tokens or color variables
rg -i "color.*variables|design.*tokens" --type=css,scss,less,js,ts,json
Length of output: 31143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for text color styles in the anchor component
rg -i "color:|color\s" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/set-container-composition-api.vue
Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the anchor component to analyze styles
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/anchor/set-container-composition-api.vue
Length of output: 1784
| const values = [] as string[] | ||
| page.on('console', async (msg) => { | ||
| for (const arg of msg.args()) { | ||
| values.push(await arg.jsonValue()) | ||
| } | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving console message handling robustness.
The current implementation could benefit from several improvements:
- Add cleanup by removing the console listener after the test
- Add error handling for JSON conversion
- Consider clearing the array between clicks to avoid memory buildup
Consider this improved implementation:
const values = [] as string[]
+ const consoleListener = async (msg) => {
+ try {
+ for (const arg of msg.args()) {
+ values.push(await arg.jsonValue())
+ }
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to process console message:', error)
+ }
+ }
- page.on('console', async (msg) => {
- for (const arg of msg.args()) {
- values.push(await arg.jsonValue())
- }
- })
+ page.on('console', consoleListener)
+ test.afterEach(() => {
+ values.length = 0
+ page.removeListener('console', consoleListener)
+ })📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const values = [] as string[] | |
| page.on('console', async (msg) => { | |
| for (const arg of msg.args()) { | |
| values.push(await arg.jsonValue()) | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| const values = [] as string[] | |
| const consoleListener = async (msg) => { | |
| try { | |
| for (const arg of msg.args()) { | |
| values.push(await arg.jsonValue()) | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to process console message:', error) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| page.on('console', consoleListener) | |
| test.afterEach(() => { | |
| values.length = 0 | |
| page.removeListener('console', consoleListener) | |
| }) |
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests