docs(input): [input] optimizing input component example #2476
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the descriptions and structure of various demo components related to input handling in a Vue.js application. Key modifications include the replacement of certain input types in descriptions, adjustments to label formatting for clarity, and the removal of unused input types across several components. Additionally, the documentation for specific demo functionalities has been enhanced to improve user understanding. Overall, the updates streamline the input components and enhance the clarity of their documentation. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.vue (2)
Line range hint
1-7: Consider enhancing the documentation example with labels and descriptions.While the implementation is correct, as a documentation example, it could be more informative by:
- Adding labels to clearly identify each input type
- Including comments or descriptions explaining the use case for each type
<template> <div class="demo-input"> + <div class="input-group"> + <label>Text Input:</label> <tiny-input v-model="text" placeholder="text"></tiny-input> + </div> + <div class="input-group"> + <label>Password Input:</label> <tiny-input type="password" v-model="password" placeholder="password"></tiny-input> + </div> + <div class="input-group"> + <label>Number Input:</label> <tiny-input type="number" v-model="number" placeholder="number"></tiny-input> + </div> </div> </template>
Line range hint
25-30: Consider updating styles to accommodate labels.If adding labels as suggested above, consider updating the styles to maintain proper alignment and spacing:
<style scoped> +.demo-input .input-group { + margin: 10px 0; + display: flex; + align-items: center; +} + +.demo-input label { + width: 120px; + margin-right: 10px; +} + .demo-input .tiny-input { width: 250px; - margin: 5px; } </style>examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native.vue (2)
Line range hint
1-24: Enhance documentation and accessibility of input examples.The demo structure could be improved to be more accessible and maintainable:
- Add descriptive comments for each example
- Use proper form labels
- Use consistent container elements
- Replace
<br />tags with proper spacingHere's a suggested improvement:
<template> <div class="demo-input"> - <p><span>disabled</span><tiny-input v-model="input" disabled></tiny-input></p> - <br /> - <p><span>readonly</span><tiny-input v-model="input" readonly></tiny-input></p> - <br /> + <!-- Example: Disabled input state --> + <div class="input-group"> + <label id="disabled-label" for="disabled-input">disabled</label> + <tiny-input + id="disabled-input" + v-model="input" + aria-labelledby="disabled-label" + disabled + ></tiny-input> + </div> + + <!-- Example: Read-only input state --> + <div class="input-group"> + <label id="readonly-label" for="readonly-input">readonly</label> + <tiny-input + id="readonly-input" + v-model="input" + aria-labelledby="readonly-label" + readonly + ></tiny-input> + </div>
Line range hint
1-61: Consider enhancing the demo documentation further.While the current changes improve the layout, consider these additional enhancements to make the documentation more valuable:
- Add a description section explaining the purpose of native input features
- Group related examples (e.g., validation-related features like min/max/step)
- Add code snippets showing the expected model value for each example
- Include validation error states and messages
Would you like me to provide a complete example of this enhanced documentation structure?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
examples/sites/demos/mobile/app/input/webdoc/input.js(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only-composition-api.vue(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only.vue(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native-composition-api.vue(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native.vue(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type-composition-api.vue(0 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.vue(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/webdoc/input.js(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type-composition-api.vue
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only-composition-api.vue
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only.vue
🔇 Additional comments (6)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-11: Verify the intentional reduction in test coverage.
The test file now only verifies three input types ('text', 'password', 'number') while removing assertions for other HTML5 input types (email, tel, url, etc.). Please confirm if this reduction in test coverage aligns with the documented capabilities of the Input component.
Let's verify the supported input types in the documentation:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
The test coverage reduction is intentional and aligns with the documented component capabilities.
The documentation and demo files show that the Input component primarily focuses on three main input types in its type demo (type.vue):
- text (default)
- password
- number
While the component does support other HTML5 input types (as seen in native.vue with email type), these are considered native HTML attributes and are not part of the core type demonstration. The test file correctly focuses on verifying the main supported input types that are actively demonstrated in the type-specific example.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the documented input types in the component documentation
# and related files to ensure test coverage matches component capabilities
# Search for input type definitions or documentation
rg -A 5 "input.*type" "examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/"
# Search for removed input types in case they are still referenced
rg -A 5 "email|tel|url|hidden|color|date|month|week|datetime-local|time|file|range" "examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/"
Length of output: 25504
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.vue (1)
Line range hint 9-23: Verify the completeness of input type documentation.
The example has been significantly simplified to show only basic input types. Please confirm:
- Are there separate examples for the removed input types (textarea, email, etc.)?
- Does this align with the documentation strategy?
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of these files to verify the input types coverage.
Let me check the content of other relevant files to get a complete picture of input type documentation.
Based on the evidence gathered, I can now provide the final response:
Input type documentation is well-organized and complete
The documentation strategy effectively covers all input types through dedicated example files:
- Basic input types (text, password, number) in
type.vue - Native HTML5 input attributes (including email) in
native.vue - Textarea-specific features in dedicated files:
rows.vue- rows/cols configurationresize.vue- resize and autosize features
- Each example has both Options API and Composition API versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other input type examples in the documentation
echo "Searching for other input type examples..."
rg -l "tiny-input.*type=" "examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/"
Length of output: 1307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of type.vue and type-composition-api.vue for input types
echo "=== Content of type.vue ==="
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.vue
echo -e "\n=== Content of type-composition-api.vue ==="
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type-composition-api.vue
echo -e "\n=== Content of native.vue ==="
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native.vue
Length of output: 2852
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of textarea-related files
echo "=== Checking for textarea examples ==="
rg -l "type=\"textarea\"" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/
echo -e "\n=== Content of rows.vue (likely textarea example) ==="
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/rows.vue
echo -e "\n=== Content of resize.vue (likely textarea example) ==="
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/resize.vue
Length of output: 3794
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native-composition-api.vue (3)
42-43: LGTM! CSS improvements enhance layout consistency.
The CSS changes improve the layout by:
- Ensuring consistent span styling across both
panddivcontainers - Adding flex layout for better alignment of autocomplete input section
Also applies to: 50-53
Line range hint 28-34: LGTM! Clean Composition API implementation.
The script setup section is well-structured with:
- Clear variable naming that matches their purpose
- Proper use of
reffor reactive state - Clean import statements
Line range hint 16-20: Verify autocomplete functionality in the email input.
The email input is configured with autocomplete="on" and proper name attribute, but ensure it works correctly with browser's autocomplete feature.
Consider adding a comment in the code to document the expected autocomplete behavior and browser compatibility notes for future maintainers.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the review of the code and search results, I can now generate the final response:
Email input autocomplete functionality is properly configured and follows standard practices
The email input implementation follows HTML5 standards with:
- Proper
type="email"attribute - Correct
name="email"attribute for browser recognition - Standard
autocomplete="on"attribute enabling browser's native autocomplete
The implementation allows browsers to:
- Validate email format natively
- Suggest previously used email addresses
- Store email addresses for future use
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any related autocomplete implementations or tests
# that might need to be updated.
# Search for other autocomplete-related code
rg -l 'autocomplete.*on' --type vue
# Search for any autocomplete tests
rg -l 'autocomplete.*test' --type vue --type js
Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different search patterns without file type restrictions
# Search for autocomplete-related code
rg -l 'autocomplete.*on'
# Search for input-related tests
rg -l 'input.*test'
# Search specifically in the demos directory for input examples
fd . examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/ -t f -x cat {}
Length of output: 58935
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any autocomplete-related tests or implementation details
# Search in the source code for autocomplete implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'autocomplete'
# Search for email input related tests
rg -l 'email.*test'
# Search for input component implementation
fd input.ts -t f -x cat {}
Length of output: 1219
examples/sites/demos/mobile/app/input/webdoc/input.js (1)
40-42: Verify the removal of textarea type.
The description has been updated to remove the textarea type, but the file still contains textarea-related demo sections. Let's verify if this is intentional.
| .demo-input > p > span, | ||
| .demo-input > div > span { | ||
| display: inline-block; | ||
| width: 130px; | ||
| } | ||
| .demo-input .tiny-input { | ||
| width: 250px; | ||
| } | ||
| .demo-input > div { | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| align-items: center; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve CSS maintainability and consistency.
The current CSS structure mixes different layout approaches and uses magic numbers:
- Inconsistent layout methods (inline-block vs flexbox)
- Hard-coded widths
- Fragile direct child selectors
Consider this more maintainable approach:
- .demo-input > p > span,
- .demo-input > div > span {
- display: inline-block;
- width: 130px;
- }
- .demo-input .tiny-input {
- width: 250px;
- }
- .demo-input > div {
- display: flex;
- align-items: center;
- }
+ .demo-input {
+ --label-width: 8rem;
+ --input-width: 15rem;
+ }
+
+ .input-group {
+ display: flex;
+ align-items: center;
+ margin-bottom: 1rem;
+ }
+
+ .input-group label {
+ flex: 0 0 var(--label-width);
+ }
+
+ .input-group .tiny-input {
+ width: var(--input-width);
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| '<p>通过对应的 <code>type</code> 属性，可以设置为对应的类型。默认为 text，可选值为 text，number 等其他 原生 input 的 type 值</p>', | ||
| 'en-US': | ||
| '<p>You can set the corresponding type through the corresponding <code>type</code> attribute. The default value is text. The options are text, textarea, and other type values of the native input</p>' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistency between Chinese and English descriptions.
The Chinese description has been updated to replace "textarea" with "number", but the English description still mentions "textarea" as an option. This creates a documentation inconsistency that could confuse users.
Apply this diff to align the English description with the Chinese one:
'zh-CN':
'<p>通过对应的 <code>type</code> 属性，可以设置为对应的类型。默认为 text，可选值为 text，number 等其他 原生 input 的 type 值</p>',
'en-US':
- '<p>You can set the corresponding type through the corresponding <code>type</code> attribute. The default value is text. The options are text, textarea, and other type values of the native input</p>'
+ '<p>You can set the corresponding type through the corresponding <code>type</code> attribute. The default value is text. The options are text, number, and other type values of the native input</p>'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| '<p>通过对应的 <code>type</code> 属性，可以设置为对应的类型。默认为 text，可选值为 text，number 等其他 原生 input 的 type 值</p>', | |
| 'en-US': | |
| '<p>You can set the corresponding type through the corresponding <code>type</code> attribute. The default value is text. The options are text, textarea, and other type values of the native input</p>' | |
| '<p>通过对应的 <code>type</code> 属性，可以设置为对应的类型。默认为 text，可选值为 text，number 等其他 原生 input 的 type 值</p>', | |
| 'en-US': | |
| '<p>You can set the corresponding type through the corresponding <code>type</code> attribute. The default value is text. The options are text, number, and other type values of the native input</p>' |
| 'zh-CN': | ||
| '<p>通过组件实例方法 <code> addMemory </code> 添加历史输入数据，输入完成后，输入会被记住。通过 <code> memory-space </code> 属性配置最多可以被记录的条数。</p>', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance English description to match Chinese content detail.
The English description lacks important details about the addMemory method and memory-space attribute that are present in the Chinese version.
Consider updating the English description to:
-'en-US': '<p>Refer to the following example. After the input is complete, the input will be remembered</p>'
+'en-US': '<p>Use the component instance method <code>addMemory</code> to add historical input data. After the input is complete, the input will be remembered. The <code>memory-space</code> attribute configures the maximum number of records that can be stored.</p>'Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| 'zh-CN': ` | ||
| <p>可设置 <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code>等原生属性。</p> | ||
| <div class="tip custom-block"> | ||
| <p class="custom-block-title"> 温馨提示： </p> | ||
| <p>原生属性是透传给 <code> input </code>原生标签的，功能和使用原生标签等同。</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| `, | ||
| 'en-US': | ||
| '<p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code> . </p>\n' | ||
| '<p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code> . </p>' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add the tip section to English description for consistency.
The Chinese description includes a helpful tip about native attributes being passed to the input tag, but this information is missing in the English version.
Consider updating the English description to include the tip section:
-'en-US': '<p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code> . </p>'
+'en-US': `
+ <p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code>.</p>
+ <div class="tip custom-block">
+ <p class="custom-block-title">Tip:</p>
+ <p>Native attributes are passed directly to the <code>input</code> native tag and function exactly the same as using native tags.</p>
+ </div>
+`📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 'zh-CN': ` | |
| <p>可设置 <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code>等原生属性。</p> | |
| <div class="tip custom-block"> | |
| <p class="custom-block-title"> 温馨提示： </p> | |
| <p>原生属性是透传给 <code> input </code>原生标签的，功能和使用原生标签等同。</p> | |
| </div> | |
| `, | |
| 'en-US': | |
| '<p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code> . </p>\n' | |
| '<p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code> . </p>' | |
| 'zh-CN': ` | |
| <p>可设置 <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code>等原生属性。</p> | |
| <div class="tip custom-block"> | |
| <p class="custom-block-title"> 温馨提示： </p> | |
| <p>原生属性是透传给 <code> input </code>原生标签的，功能和使用原生标签等同。</p> | |
| </div> | |
| `, | |
| 'en-US': ` | |
| <p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code>.</p> | |
| <div class="tip custom-block"> | |
| <p class="custom-block-title">Tip:</p> | |
| <p>Native attributes are passed directly to the <code>input</code> native tag and function exactly the same as using native tags.</p> | |
| </div> | |
| ` |
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores