Update openstack-k8s-operators (main) #1204

openstack-k8s-ci-robot · 2024-11-23T05:33:04Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/barbican-operator/api	require	digest	`37d5a9b` -> `42e8034`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/cinder-operator/api	require	digest	`9e97663` -> `9941c12`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/designate-operator/api	require	digest	`c06a12f` -> `7bc56aa`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/glance-operator/api	require	digest	`89e9fe9` -> `d8e6e13`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/heat-operator/api	require	digest	`1c476cf` -> `1491a54`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/horizon-operator/api	require	digest	`c38568c` -> `f5fcda7`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/infra-operator/apis	require	digest	`b225194` -> `18e54a0`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/ironic-operator/api	require	digest	`63d25e2` -> `3faa669`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/keystone-operator/api	require	digest	`322aab6` -> `dc78e72`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/certmanager	require	digest	`6dc9fd0` -> `d172b3a`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/common	require	digest	`6dc9fd0` -> `d172b3a`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/openstack	indirect	digest	`6dc9fd0` -> `d172b3a`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/storage	require	digest	`6dc9fd0` -> `d172b3a`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/test	require	digest	`6dc9fd0` -> `d172b3a`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/manila-operator/api	require	digest	`bfd56f1` -> `110a2db`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/mariadb-operator/api	require	digest	`c6bef3c` -> `4e7d8f7`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/neutron-operator/api	require	digest	`591a3bc` -> `6be30e8`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/nova-operator/api	require	digest	`42b7b84` -> `afc9663`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/octavia-operator/api	require	digest	`bc64ab6` -> `ceff33a`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/openstack-baremetal-operator/api	require	digest	`3d33d3d` -> `6f26588`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/ovn-operator/api	require	digest	`a34ad51` -> `5d6fb2e`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/placement-operator/api	require	digest	`e4c1ba6` -> `92a44b2`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/swift-operator/api	require	digest	`6ab57de` -> `477944c`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/telemetry-operator/api	require	digest	`f2c8dd9` -> `ff87fed`
github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/test-operator/api	require	digest	`20927e1` -> `b2b1b46`

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" in timezone America/New_York, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

stuggi · 2024-11-25T15:24:01Z

/retest

stuggi · 2024-11-26T09:53:35Z

/retest

stuggi

/lgtm

softwarefactory-project-zuul · 2024-12-10T10:50:59Z

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/6d6fec81733e4f6a8c2e39f48e7a3c53

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 08m 46s
❌ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc POST_FAILURE in 1h 16m 01s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 1h 32m 21s
✔️ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph-provider SUCCESS in 2h 56m 54s
✔️ openstack-operator-tempest-multinode SUCCESS in 1h 39m 54s

stuggi · 2024-12-10T10:59:23Z

recheck

stuggi · 2024-12-10T10:59:44Z

/test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

hjensas · 2024-12-11T12:37:25Z

/test precommit-check
/test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

openstack-k8s-ci-robot · 2024-12-13T12:11:55Z

ℹ Artifact update notice

File name: apis/go.mod

In order to perform the update(s) described in the table above, Renovate ran the go get command, which resulted in the following additional change(s):

11 additional dependencies were updated

Details:

Package	Change
`k8s.io/api`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`k8s.io/apimachinery`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`k8s.io/client-go`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`github.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3`	`v3.11.2` -> `v3.12.0`
`github.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer`	`v0.20.2` -> `v0.21.0`
`github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference`	`v0.20.4` -> `v0.21.0`
`github.com/go-openapi/swag`	`v0.22.9` -> `v0.23.0`
`github.com/prometheus/procfs`	`v0.12.0` -> `v0.13.0`
`k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`k8s.io/component-base`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`k8s.io/kube-openapi`	`v0.0.0-20240228011516-70dd3763d340` -> `v0.0.0-20240322212309-b815d8309940`

File name: go.mod

In order to perform the update(s) described in the table above, Renovate ran the go get command, which resulted in the following additional change(s):

11 additional dependencies were updated

Details:

Package	Change
`k8s.io/api`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`k8s.io/apimachinery`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`k8s.io/client-go`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`github.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3`	`v3.11.2` -> `v3.12.0`
`github.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer`	`v0.20.2` -> `v0.21.0`
`github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference`	`v0.20.4` -> `v0.21.0`
`github.com/go-openapi/swag`	`v0.22.9` -> `v0.23.0`
`github.com/prometheus/procfs`	`v0.12.0` -> `v0.13.0`
`k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`k8s.io/component-base`	`v0.29.11` -> `v0.29.12`
`k8s.io/kube-openapi`	`v0.0.0-20240228011516-70dd3763d340` -> `v0.0.0-20240322212309-b815d8309940`

stuggi · 2024-12-13T15:20:14Z

@vakwetu are the barbican changes ok to be merged? afaik pkcs11 is optional, so it should be fine?

ERROR: "NoBools": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.AESGCMGenerateIV may not be a boolean
ERROR: "NoBools": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.OSLockingOK may not be a boolean
ERROR: "NoBools": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.keyWrapGenerateIV may not be a boolean
ERROR: "NoBools": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.alwaysSetCKASensitive may not be a boolean
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.HMACLabel is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.MKEKLabel is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.libraryPath is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.loginSecret is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.serverAddress is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.type is new and may not be required

@omersch381 @beagles same for designate?

ERROR: "ListsMustHaveSSATags": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.designate.template.designateCentral.redisHostIPs must set x-kubernetes-list-type
ERROR: "ListsMustHaveSSATags": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.designate.template.designateProducer.redisHostIPs must set x-kubernetes-list-type
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.designate.template.redisServiceName is new and may not be required

stuggi · 2024-12-13T15:21:03Z

/test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

stuggi · 2024-12-16T08:21:40Z

@vakwetu are the barbican changes ok to be merged? afaik pkcs11 is optional, so it should be fine?

ERROR: "NoBools": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.AESGCMGenerateIV may not be a boolean
ERROR: "NoBools": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.OSLockingOK may not be a boolean
ERROR: "NoBools": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.keyWrapGenerateIV may not be a boolean
ERROR: "NoBools": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.alwaysSetCKASensitive may not be a boolean
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.HMACLabel is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.MKEKLabel is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.libraryPath is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.loginSecret is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.serverAddress is new and may not be required
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.barbican.template.pkcs11.type is new and may not be required

@omersch381 @beagles same for designate?

ERROR: "ListsMustHaveSSATags": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.designate.template.designateCentral.redisHostIPs must set x-kubernetes-list-type
ERROR: "ListsMustHaveSSATags": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.designate.template.designateProducer.redisHostIPs must set x-kubernetes-list-type
ERROR: "NoNewRequiredFields": crd/openstackcontrolplanes.core.openstack.org version/v1beta1 field/^.spec.designate.template.redisServiceName is new and may not be required

designate now has a required RedisServiceName which is required with a default, which seems to be odd https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/designate-operator/blob/main/api/v1beta1/designate_types.go#L185

vakwetu · 2024-12-16T15:16:54Z

@stuggi yes - the barbican changes are definitely OK to be merged. I made a comment about them in the initial commit. The pkcs11 struct is new and is optional. Its also referenced as a pointer - which will be nil for a barbican undergoing update.

stuggi · 2024-12-16T15:53:09Z

  [FAILED] Timed out after 10.000s.
  The function passed to Eventually failed at /go/pkg/mod/github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/[email protected]/test/helpers/conditions.go:46 with:
  Does not have condition type MinorUpdateDataplane
  Expected
      <bool>: false
  to be true
  In [It] at: /go/pkg/mod/github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/[email protected]/test/helpers/conditions.go:53 @ 12/16/24 13:24:26.777
  Full Stack Trace
    github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/common/test/helpers.(*TestHelper).ExpectCondition(0xc0018e4e10, {{0xc001998ff0, 0x24}, {0xc001b0c090, 0x19}}, {0x25670e0?, 0x2331cf0}, {0x21fe518, 0x14}, {0x21dd1f4, ...})
    	/go/pkg/mod/github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common/modules/[email protected]/test/helpers/conditions.go:53 +0x38e
    github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/openstack-operator/tests/functional/ctlplane_test.glob..func4.3.2.6({0x258fb40, 0xc0010d23f0})
    	/go/src/github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/operator/tests/functional/ctlplane/openstackversion_controller_test.go:538 +0x1cc
    reflect.Value.call({0x1d8d000?, 0xc002fc86c0?, 0x3b9aca00?}, {0x21dd23c, 0x4}, {0xc0021ac378, 0x1, 0x3b?})
    	/usr/lib/golang/src/reflect/value.go:596 +0xce7
    reflect.Value.Call({0x1d8d000?, 0xc002fc86c0?, 0xc000074500?}, {0xc0021ac378?, 0xc76181cbbc28?, 0x20c8fc0?})
    	/usr/lib/golang/src/reflect/value.go:380 +0xb9
    github.com/onsi/gomega/internal.(*AsyncAssertion).buildActualPoller.func3()
    	/go/pkg/mod/github.com/onsi/[email protected]/internal/async_assertion.go:325 +0x11f
    github.com/onsi/gomega/internal.(*AsyncAssertion).match(0xc000374000, {0x2576f20?, 0x380c360}, 0x1, {0x0, 0x0, 0x0})
    	/go/pkg/mod/github.com/onsi/[email protected]/internal/async_assertion.go:398 +0x179
    github.com/onsi/gomega/internal.(*AsyncAssertion).Should(0xc000374000, {0x2576f20, 0x380c360}, {0x0, 0x0, 0x0})
    	/go/pkg/mod/github.com/onsi/[email protected]/internal/async_assertion.go:145 +0x86
    github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/openstack-operator/tests/functional/ctlplane_test.glob..func4.3.2()
    	/go/src/github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/operator/tests/functional/ctlplane/openstackversion_controller_test.go:553 +0x755

with openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#590 , the MinorUpdateDataplane condition is gone as soon the update is done. @dprince do you see an issue with this, or it is ok to just remove the check for the condition in https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/openstack-operator/blob/main/tests/functional/ctlplane/openstackversion_controller_test.go#L538-L543 ?

softwarefactory-project-zuul · 2024-12-16T16:35:38Z

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/03e431000b074cbe9830ab8201705454

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 3h 23m 17s
❌ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc POST_FAILURE in 1h 21m 56s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 1h 38m 10s
✔️ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph-provider SUCCESS in 3h 06m 19s
✔️ openstack-operator-tempest-multinode SUCCESS in 1h 48m 44s

dprince · 2024-12-16T16:46:45Z

with openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#590 , the MinorUpdateDataplane condition is gone as soon the update is done. @dprince do you see an issue with this, or it is ok to just remove the check for the condition in https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/openstack-operator/blob/main/tests/functional/ctlplane/openstackversion_controller_test.go#L538-L543 ?

Lets just drop that condition I think. No need to have it if there is no realistic way you would need it anymore.

When the dataplane minor update finished, the controller will not set a OpenStackVersionMinorUpdateOVNDataplane after [1]. This change will remove the no longer required check. [1] openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#590 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>

stuggi · 2024-12-17T08:04:54Z

/test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

openstack-k8s-ci-robot · 2024-12-17T08:12:42Z

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

stuggi · 2024-12-17T09:22:28Z

Get "https://api.oko-12.oooci.ccitredhat.com:6443/api?timeout=32s": dial tcp 38.102.83.63:6443: connect: no route to host

stuggi · 2024-12-17T09:22:33Z

/test openstack-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

softwarefactory-project-zuul · 2024-12-17T09:25:46Z

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/bd1a1fb3eeaa4fe2ade9b0ea3a567f99

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 01m 23s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SUCCESS in 1h 20m 01s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 1h 33m 15s
❌ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph-provider RETRY_LIMIT in 40m 53s
❌ openstack-operator-tempest-multinode FAILURE in 1h 48m 29s

stuggi · 2024-12-17T10:07:52Z

recheck

stuggi · 2024-12-17T10:44:45Z

/override ci/prow/precommit-check

stuggi · 2024-12-17T10:53:45Z

/override ci/prow/precommit-check

openshift-ci · 2024-12-17T10:53:50Z

@stuggi: Overrode contexts on behalf of stuggi: ci/prow/precommit-check

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/precommit-check

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

stuggi

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2024-12-17T10:57:25Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openstack-k8s-ci-robot, stuggi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [stuggi]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

stuggi · 2024-12-17T16:29:44Z

/retest

stuggi · 2024-12-17T16:37:59Z

/override ci/prow/precommit-check

openshift-ci · 2024-12-17T16:38:05Z

@stuggi: Overrode contexts on behalf of stuggi: ci/prow/precommit-check

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/precommit-check

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci bot requested review from olliewalsh and rebtoor November 23, 2024 05:33

stuggi added approved lgtm labels Nov 26, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot changed the title ~~Update github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/infra-operator/apis digest to 6821e16 (main)~~ Update openstack-k8s-operators (main) Nov 30, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/main-openstack-k8s-operators branch from 2f16820 to 9b93397 Compare November 30, 2024 05:37

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Nov 30, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/main-openstack-k8s-operators branch 2 times, most recently from 1f09c9d to 1bc846c Compare December 7, 2024 07:59

stuggi approved these changes Dec 10, 2024

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot assigned stuggi Dec 10, 2024

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Dec 10, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/main-openstack-k8s-operators branch from 1bc846c to 880c5c3 Compare December 10, 2024 07:40

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Dec 10, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/main-openstack-k8s-operators branch from 880c5c3 to e7ae6ca Compare December 12, 2024 14:50

openstack-k8s-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/main-openstack-k8s-operators branch from e7ae6ca to a556240 Compare December 13, 2024 12:11

openstack-k8s-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/main-openstack-k8s-operators branch from a556240 to ed2a81f Compare December 14, 2024 05:13

Update openstack-k8s-operators

c080dc8

openstack-k8s-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/main-openstack-k8s-operators branch from ed2a81f to c080dc8 Compare December 16, 2024 13:11

stuggi approved these changes Dec 17, 2024

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Dec 17, 2024

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 7456bee into main Dec 17, 2024
7 checks passed

omersch381 mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2024

[Designate] Add Mdns replica count #1207

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update openstack-k8s-operators (main) #1204

Update openstack-k8s-operators (main) #1204

openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 23, 2024 •

edited

Loading

stuggi commented Nov 25, 2024

stuggi commented Nov 26, 2024

stuggi left a comment

softwarefactory-project-zuul bot commented Dec 10, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 10, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 10, 2024

hjensas commented Dec 11, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading

stuggi commented Dec 13, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 13, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 16, 2024

vakwetu commented Dec 16, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 16, 2024

softwarefactory-project-zuul bot commented Dec 16, 2024

dprince commented Dec 16, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

softwarefactory-project-zuul bot commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi left a comment

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Update openstack-k8s-operators (main) #1204

Update openstack-k8s-operators (main) #1204

Conversation

openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 23, 2024 • edited Loading

Configuration

stuggi commented Nov 25, 2024

stuggi commented Nov 26, 2024

stuggi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

softwarefactory-project-zuul bot commented Dec 10, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 10, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 10, 2024

hjensas commented Dec 11, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2024 • edited Loading

ℹ Artifact update notice

File name: apis/go.mod

File name: go.mod

stuggi commented Dec 13, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 13, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 16, 2024

vakwetu commented Dec 16, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 16, 2024

softwarefactory-project-zuul bot commented Dec 16, 2024

dprince commented Dec 16, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 17, 2024

Edited/Blocked Notification

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

softwarefactory-project-zuul bot commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024 • edited Loading

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2024

openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Nov 23, 2024 •

edited

Loading

openstack-k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading

stuggi commented Dec 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading