-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 279
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only run DlsFlsValveImpl.invoke on indices requests #4937
Draft
cwperks
wants to merge
5
commits into
opensearch-project:main
Choose a base branch
from
cwperks:fix-ism-update-request
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would guess that the valve code needs to be at least also called for scroll requests, otherwise FLS and field masking might be not correctly applied.
Generally, as the issue seems to be of a very specific kind, I am wondering whether the fix should be equally specific.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just pushed a commit to check the action prefix alone. If the action prefix is not
indices:
, then DlsFlsValveImpl would be skipped.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still, I think the fault is rather on the ISM side: It defines an action which has a request which extends
UpdateRequest
and thus in turn extendsIndicesRequest
- while the type string iscluster:admin/opendistro/transform/stop
, i.e. it indicates it to be a cluster request. That seems to be a contradiction in itself.I am a bit surprised that this should only occur after the merge of #4380. At least this basic behavior of DlsFlsValveImpl did not change. If this is really related to #4380, we should find out why #4380 changes this behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Before #4380 , it would get short circuited here because the
helpdesk_role
has no restrictions. The new code does not use that data structure and instead calls onIndexNameExpressionResolver.getConcreteIndices
and passes in*
because the resolved request shows*
as you pointed out in #4937 (comment)