Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Test] Delete 202 headers property #3683

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ankhyk
Copy link

@ankhyk ankhyk commented Nov 7, 2023

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@ankhyk ankhyk requested a review from ArcturusZhang as a code owner November 7, 2023 06:11
Copy link

Automatic PR validation started. This comment will be populated with next steps to merge this PR once validation is completed. Please wait ⌛.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app-test bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️🔄Breaking Change(Cross-Version) inProgress [Detail]
️🔄LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️[NotRequired_Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️~[NotRequired_Staging] SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️~[NotRequired_Staging] TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️[NotRequired_Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️[NotRequired_Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️🔄[NotRequired_Staging] SDK Track2 Validation inProgress [Detail]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app-test bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️🔄[NotRequired_Staging] ApiDocPreview inProgress [Detail]
️️✔️[NotRequired_Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking

️🔄 $(sdkName) inProgress [Detail]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app-test bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Generated ApiView

Language Package Name ApiView Link
Swagger Microsoft.Addons https://apiviewstaging.azurewebsites.net/Assemblies/Review/984fa7883143435bb4a4e046afaa591f

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants