Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address some Static Analysis Issues #519 #521

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

ashman-p
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses some static analysis errors reported by Coverity tool.

@ashman-p ashman-p marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2024 05:36
@ashman-p ashman-p requested a review from baentsch as a code owner September 15, 2024 05:36
@ashman-p ashman-p self-assigned this Sep 15, 2024
Copy link
Member

@baentsch baentsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes all make sense and improve code safety. Thanks @ashman-p !

@ashman-p ashman-p requested review from feventura and a user September 16, 2024 15:57
@ashman-p
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @baentsch, i am not sure if i needed another approval, so adding a few more reviewers.

@baentsch
Copy link
Member

No, 1 review is sufficient in a project with as many maintainers :-) Do you have permissions to merge?

@ashman-p ashman-p merged commit 0312c00 into open-quantum-safe:main Sep 18, 2024
28 checks passed
@ashman-p ashman-p deleted the na_81_rsc_leak-2 branch September 18, 2024 07:44
@baentsch
Copy link
Member

@ashman-p Is it possible that you merged this without squashing? The commit history at least got substantially longer that I'd figure it should be. If no, please do so in the future to keep things together that belong together. Thanks!

@ashman-p
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ashman-p Is it possible that you merged this without squashing? The commit history at least got substantially longer that I'd figure it should be. If no, please do so in the future to keep things together that belong together. Thanks!

I think that was the case. I will remember to squash be the merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants