Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.6.1-rc1 #429

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024
Merged

0.6.1-rc1 #429

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

baentsch
Copy link
Member

@baentsch baentsch commented Jun 9, 2024

Should serve to facilitate a release.
Also detaches oqsprovider from inconsistent liboqs main.

baentsch added 2 commits June 9, 2024 10:55
Signed-off-by: Michael Baentsch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Baentsch <[email protected]>
@baentsch baentsch marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2024 10:58
@baentsch baentsch requested review from SWilson4 and a user June 9, 2024 10:58
.github/workflows/linux.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/linux.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
baentsch added 3 commits June 11, 2024 17:40
Signed-off-by: Michael Baentsch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Baentsch <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Baentsch <[email protected]>
@baentsch
Copy link
Member Author

@SWilson4 I'm signing off now -- could you please mark your comments resolved as and when that's the case (and CI passes)? I'd then create a draft release tomorrow against this branch and we can see how/whether when to merge (or whether to relax the bind to 0.10.1 as/if open-quantum-safe/liboqs#1820 lands.

@SWilson4
Copy link
Member

@SWilson4 I'm signing off now -- could you please mark your comments resolved as and when that's the case (and CI passes)? I'd then create a draft release tomorrow against this branch and we can see how/whether when to merge (or whether to relax the bind to 0.10.1 as/if open-quantum-safe/liboqs#1820 lands.

Now that open-quantum-safe/liboqs#1820 has landed and CI is no longer broken, it doesn't seem necessary to detach oqs-provider from liboqs main, unless in your judgement it's preferable to couple 0.6.1 to 0.10.1 more tightly. I made #431 targeting this branch to (hopefully) streamline the process tomorrow.

@SWilson4
Copy link
Member

SWilson4 commented Jun 11, 2024

As of now, some of our CI tests (including on liboqs main) are failing, probably due to https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/lfrlwdg67fn8.

@baentsch baentsch merged commit 40442e8 into main Jun 12, 2024
52 checks passed
@baentsch baentsch deleted the mb-061 branch June 14, 2024 04:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants