-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Add TFMs for net{6,7,8}.0 #172
refactor: Add TFMs for net{6,7,8}.0 #172
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #172 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.73% 94.73%
=======================================
Files 23 23
Lines 931 931
Branches 93 93
=======================================
Hits 882 882
Misses 29 29
Partials 20 20 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
a6b1faa
to
1be951d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine with this probably a bigger question currently we aren't really using any features above .netstandard2.0 so targeting net6,7,8 is really pointless because there is no runtime benefit. I guess in the future we can look at optimisations and utilize some of the new runtime feature were available
Fixes: open-feature#160, open-feature#169 Signed-off-by: Austin Drenski <[email protected]>
1be951d
to
f93659a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Austin Drenski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artyom Tonoyan <[email protected]>
As a consumer of the OpenFeature SDK, I want
OpenFeature.dll
to be built and tested against all of the supported TFMs that my projects might encounter in the wild.This PR:
global.json
to8.0.100
7.0.x
to instead resolve based onglobal.json
net6.0
,net7.0
, andnet8.0
net6.0
is EOL in2024-11-12
net7.0
is EOL in2024-05-14
Fixes: #160, #169